Rossi didn't make it rain nor make Lorenzo crash. For me the issue has always been that VRs few rivals (by design) not only have to compete on the track but also mitigate whatever effects from rules changes or tire "development" materialize during the season. Only 3 men were ever going to win the championship this year, is that a "conspiracy"? The only people who employ this retort are resorting to a lazy response (apart from those incapable of defending their position). There were 4 contending machines, but we know Pedro made the odds 1:3. We virtually know this. And so VR by design had a 1:3 chance. While everyone has been preoccupied blaming the RCV for Marquez's meltdown little to no attention has been highlighted on this year's tires until recently. The tire development had the effect of the pendulum swing from the Marc/RCV domination to a Jlo/VR--M1 domination. The only "conspiracy" part of this statement is my assertion that it was by design. The non conspiracy part of that statement is the reality that it has indeed had this undeniable effect on the three contenders. The swing becomes more discernible and pronounced if you look back at VR's poor race win record the last two years. Did the tires have an effect? Yes. Fact. So is this all "conspiracy"? No.
Gamblers take bets on worse odds. This was a sure bet for Dorna, 1:3 is practically a toss up. And when you factor in unforseen factors, like we've had the last two rounds, it makes the bet a non risk no brainer. I'd even say, Dorna were happy just to have VR on the podiums, which when u have a 4 bike championship is virtually guaranteed. What part of this last statement is "conspiracy"? Answer: my assertion that that it was by design, ie Dorna brokered. Lets examine then the "conspiracy" part of the above.
Here is the challenge #1: Can someone dispute the odds for a title win this year was not virtually a 1:3 odds for Marquez, Lorenzo, and Rossi? Are these odds a type of "conspiracy"? Explain.
Challenge #2: Can someone tell me the odds of VR winning a title when he was at Ducati? How did those odds change when he was signed back with Yamaha? Are these odds a type of "conspiracy"? Explain.
Challenge#3: Have the tires this year had an adverse effect on the RCVs while seemingly favorable to M1s? Is this reality a conspiracy? Explain.
Challenge #4: Kropo is on record here saying Dorna were involved in subsidizing Valentino's return to Yamaha. Fact. Is this a "conspiracy"? Explain.
My answers:
#1: Not conspiracy, its simply a statement of odds. The same type of statistics a legit odds make would produce. Simple math.
#2: Not conspiracy, even the odds makers (and a casual observer of GP) could calculate the odds for VR on a Ducati were unrealistic long shots, while at Yamaha those odds became virtually 1:3. Simple math.
#3: Not conspiracy. Though the variable of the tire causing favorable or detrimental conditions for the factory bikes can be disputed, the reality of the outcomes are real and undeniable. The beneficiaries of the tire this year have been factory M1 riders.
#4: Not conspiracy, because this is not an 'opinion' by Kropo, which can be disputed, but rather a fact. Backed up by other verifiable sources.