I do to some extent attempt to be fair whilst being at heart a fanboy, but do generally believe that while the denigration by an element among his fandom of some (OK most) of his rivals is objectionable, Valentino's career statistics are also what they are.Wait, I think you just described Nicky Hayden.
Gaz, you suffer from the same ailment as Michael, whilst trying to sound impartial make the mistake of throwing a bone. CS>VR, I know both u and Mike think this, have the balls to say it homie. (Think in your mind's eye what u base your assessment on VRs "greatness" Give CS while taking away from VR-- the preferred tires, the preferred machine, the top teams, and the league's blessings and interventions, what would the record books look like?)
Rossi in the flush of his youth was obviously as fast as most, but what distinguishes him from the fastest of his rivals is his ability to keep it going for so long. Stoner didn't have the motivation to continue after only 6 years in the premier class and 2 titles, and I don't believe could have continued to be healthy enough to compete at age 36 given his extreme style; I wonder whether the same will prove true of MM.
It is no doubt true as you say, and unfortunate, that currently the riders of only 4 bikes have a chance of winning, but being on one of those 4 bikes is not sufficient in itself as has been demonstrated by the likes of Biaggi, Edwards, Spies, Dovi, Pedrosa etc, talented beyond the dreams of ordinary men though they all were,