How was the conspiracy (not his or mine anyway in regard to this race at least) proven false?
Because David Emmett wrote an opinion piece, probably from Holland, about a race in Argentina? Dean Adams wrote one from wherever he is in the USA which put a different slant on the exact same press/whatever release DB posted which once again had been available for hours and which I, and I suspect everyone else, had already read; it was posted on crashnet for a start. At least DB was only a few hours behind everyone this time rather than many months as was the case when he posted the article about the Brno 2016 race. I personally would rate Dean Adams as having a similar level of credibility to you and JKant, but his opinion piece is out there just as David Emmett's is.
I wasn't going to bother posting about it again, but if you insist there is a direct quote from MM in DB's press release where he says that neither he nor any of the other riders at the safety committee meeting (13 in total) asked for the tyre, and that he himself had complained about the compound, and I quote "not about the profile and a different tyre". That is what is factual, and in "fact" counterfactual to what Michelin had said, whatever David Emmett may choose to opine.
Rossi's giant conspiracy announced to the whole world press which maligned his 2 main competitors at the time, in one case in regard to the rider's character, calling him a liar and a cheat, and in the case of the other discrediting the world title he subsequently won, a conspiracy he still holds to and has revisited this year, is entirely relevant in the face of your ridiculous indignation about a few posters on here suspecting him and/or Dorna of shenanigans.
Last edited:
