<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Apr 10 2010, 10:26 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Most of the problems in 08 were down to set up (besides the one motor failure) and a lack of response to Yamaha and rossi upping their games. Had they continued with proper development on the 07 machine they may have run away with it again, why they didn't?
Set up problems which disappeared within about 1 race after they changed the engine +/- electronics?.
No-one seriously disputes that valentino is the best rider ( at this moment in time anyway
).
I have only followed GP bike racing for 25 years or so, but I have always assumed that the whole game in the sport was to develop the best bike (and the best tyres prior to 2008) and to get the best rider to ride the bike and develop the bike and tyres. I have absolutely no problem with valentino winning the 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2005 championships on definitely the best bike and tyres, and the 2008 and 2009 championships on quite likely the best bike and equal tyres, particularly since he obviously mostly significantly contributed to the quality of the bike and/or tyres. What I object to is the hypocrisy of those of your ilk who complain about his purported disadvantages in 2006 and 2007, and acclaim him for winning the 2004 championship on what was possibly only nearly the best bike. He and jb were in their 3rd year at yamaha in 2006, and their 4th in 2007, and he was there entirely by his own choice; presumably he is only responsible when things go well at yamaha, not when they go badly. Ducati/bridgestone did fairly clearly have a tyre advantage in 2007, but only because ducati took a punt on the then inferior tyre manufacturer and worked with them for several years to attain supremacy. I should point out that when it became obvious the bridgestones were superior rossi immediately demanded that he be allowed to switch to these tyres which he had no part in developing, with which I don't have much problem; I do have a problem with ducati/stoner then very likely being denied (I am sure entirely coincidentally
) by the single tyre rule the bridgestone tyres developed to particularly suit their bike, and being denied the chance to re-develop the best tyres again with michelin which they were very happy to attempt.