Joined Apr 2015
6K Posts | 5K+
NJ
Many good points as is your wont.
Sure sports journalism is dead, and I strongly suspect so called journalists frequently get talking points from sports forums rather than doing actual research, so the tail is wagging the dog. As you say the public relations stuff run by the teams including the riders has got to the stage where unguarded information is hard to source anyway.
With the criticism of Martin it perhaps goes back to one of your perceptive previous arguments, that the hegemon is always favoured, and MM is the old hegemon and Bagnaia is becoming the new hegemon as it stands.
Martin I gather was far from a silver spoon rider in his youth, and has got to where he is on merit. It shouldn’t be forgotten he is not a factory rider, and satellite riders contending for titles has been vanishingly rare over the 40 odd years I have followed the sport, unless the Rossi Nastro Azzurro team is counted as a satellite team, and i am more confident that Valentino got full factory support than I am that Martin is receiving same..
I agree he has gotten where he has on merit. However I believe the criticism is certainly justified based on a whole slew of events. I look at it that Pecco has made missteps but he also stepped up when he had absolutely had no other choice. Martin has not done so. When the expectation of the season for both Pecco and Martin individually was to win the world title, nothing less will do. While crashing in the sprint race is not ideal, crashing in the GP is even more damaging to title chances. Martin picks the wrong times to go down. Pecco is riding superbly, and I believe this will not change at all.
Regardless of the support I do believe the record books reflect the Nastro Azzurro team as being a satellite team.