I've seen several articles today along these lines:
Podcast reaction after Jorge Martin dramatically slides out of the race and world championship lead at Sachsenring.
www.crash.net
It seems that criticizing Martin is en vogue today, which is understandable, I suppose, since journalists have increasingly less access to real paddock information, and they have resorted to clickbait editorials for website traffic. However, these types of articles seem particularly cruel and without context. It's true that Martin has 3 major mistakes on his recent record, Indo 2023, Jerez 2024 and Sachsenring 2024, but is his record THAT different from other frontrunners?
How did Martin get a stranglehold on the 2023 championship? IIRC, it was Pecco's non-scores and Catalunya and India. How did Martin build a lead during the 2024 season? Pecco clashed with Marc unnecessarily at Portimao, and then Pecco crashed out of the lead during the Catalunya sprint.
And who can forget Bagnaia's error-filled 2022 campaign (Motegi most of all), which was only bested by Quartararo's epic meltdown?
Martin cannot capitalize on the gifts he receives, but Pecco Claus has a history of providing bountiful gifts. The difference it seems is that Bagnaia is either on the box or he's in the gravel, whereas his competitors are often top-5 or gravel. In 2023, Jorge Martin had 8 finishes off of the podium. Bagnaia had just 1 finish off of the podium. It's difficult for sprint wins to make up that big of a gap.
If Martin-bashing articles are required, perhaps they should have been written after COTA, when Martin managed 4th place. Martin has only finished outside of the top-3 once this season. This win or bin pattern he is executing during the first half of 2024 is actually quite similar to Bagnaia's formula for winning championships.