...Once Vinales, Dovi and ....... showed up, his pace picked by 7-8 tenths ...
Wait, are you saying Rossi was sandbagging? You mean to tell me he was employing the criminal activity that he accused Marquez of last year? Wasn't part of the accusation that Marquez had greater pace but he refused to use it until prompted?
Philip Island, Marquez sandbagged until the last lap until he found a second out of thin air to help Lorenzo by beating him?
Sepang, Marquez sandbagged until Rossi caught him then suddenly found the pace to be passed by Rossi repeatedly?
Valencia, sandbagged behind Lorenzo until Pedrosa used his sudden pace (was probably sandbagging too) to attempt an overtaking where he ran wide giving the fast line to Marquez?
Now Rossi is sandbagging? Say it isn't so.
Even a #2 bike shouldn't cause a decrease of a full second per lap. Rossi had pace with his first bike. There was obviously at least some sort of issue with the second bike to account for the huge difference in lap times. When Marquez has a lead he rides flat out, he doesn't "toy" with anybody when he has a lead. I'm surprised all of the Marquez fanboys don't even know his riding style. What a joke
I'm glad you've stuck around the forum. We need members like you to provide us with various viewpoint. I hope you convince Da Ambassador to post more. I'd like to read his opinions. Of course, as you've no doubt learned, it does take some skin to stick around. Take the forum for what it is, just a place where we all can soap box.
Rossi 'alluded' to 'maybe' a 'possible' tire issue. This would account for a difference, but as Povol said, I think it was a combination of Marc's stronger pace with Rossi's weaker pace. That can certainly come from the common difference of a #1 versus #2 bike.
However, i like to make comment as to an underlying message I detect in your post. To the point about the difference in bikes and how the pit stop may have cheated Rossi out of a win. (See his post race comments, now being echoed in other forums and comments sections). I'd like to point out Marquez was aware his second bike was superior to his first. His strategic plan was to "finish strong" rather than start strong. Contrast this to Rossi. I haven't read comments regarding his two bike strategy, but one of two things seems to be true, 1. He intended to have a stronger bike to start, or 2. His second stint was compromised by a poorer bike and/or poor tire. Either way, the fact remains, Marquez was stronger in the second stint to Rossi.
Here is the point, Marquez equalled or bested Rossi wilst he was on his weaker bike and Rossi was on his better one. Can someone explain why Rossi would attempt to assert that he was going to beat Marquez without the pit stop given that Marquez would have obviously picked his stronger bike which had superior pace to Rossi? That's not even factoring in that as Rossi himself has alluded, Michelin have a quality control problem.