Prior seasons are not irrelevvant, you think they are because it doesnt fit your fantasy.Go back and look at wet races before the sophisticated ecu's, still overwhelmingly the same winners. You have this fantasy that backmarkers are really as good as the top riders but the numbers foil you at every turn. So Jack Miller won a wet race, do you really think that Marquez would have pulled over and let him go if it meant anything. Crutchlow won a wet race because he was in the position to gamble, nothing less, nothing more. If he had anything to lose he probably doesnt take that gamble.
Yes they are irrelevant.
You're being dense. When conducting a comparison, all conditions MUST be the same.
Are the conditions of 2016 the same as 2015? Nope.
Are they the same as 2014? Nope.
Repeat back to 2006.
Povol, I get in your fantasy world, all variables are the same, but anyone with a modicum of awareness knows this is not true.
What I find laughable is your ........ claim that backmarkers aren't as good as some of the frontrunners. Certain backmarkers are not good, but others are quite good. You've concocted this imaginary reality where backmarkers can't possibly ever be as talented as anyone towards the front of the grid, even though anyone who has watched racing KNOWS this is not always true. Racing has never been a meritocracy, and there are plenty of riders who through circumstances were not availed the best machinery on the grid for one reason or another. Anyone who still holds onto the belief that racing is a meritocracy, I have beach front property in Arizona to sell you.
MM may have let Miller, go but you also operate under the ASSUMPTION that if he rides at a quicker pace, the results at the front flip-flop to MM P1, JM P2. Who's to say MM doesn't crash out trying to catch Miller? I can start changing outcomes too there if I want to based in order too suit my needs. That is why your belief that if it meant anything the result changes, is complete, utter ......... When you play the what-if-card, infinite possibilities unfold, and unless you have a view into the multiverse, the only outcome that matters is the one we saw happen. Coulda, shoulda, woulda, it all sounds great when you want to debate alternate realities, which isn't what we're debating here.
Also do me a favor, don't pull a "Vudu" here and suddenly claim you know how much effort a rider is actually putting into the race when it is wet.