MotoGP: 2015 Round 17 - Shell Malaysia Motorcycle Grand Prix (SPOILERS)

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Our biggest difference in opinion is coming from how we perceive that corner. I say he had no more room you think he did. Thats honestly the only reason we are in disagreement about what happened.
 
It wouldn't take that much pressure from a knee to turn the bars causing the front to tuck. Especially at a slower speed. At a faster speed it would cause speed wobbling tank slappers. But at a slow speed it will tuck the front. Something you could do with you arms. A well placed knee could easily wash the front which it did here. Again I say I don't believe that was Rossi's intent but it is still what happened. How else do you think Marc went down exactly?
I think the only reason Marc went down is because his brake lever hit Rossi's leg or part of Rossi's bike.
 
I think the only reason Marc went down is because his brake lever hit Rossi's leg or part of Rossi's bike.
Agreed. Lever or just the bars. Either way it caused the front to tuck. Had they been moving faster it might not have caused a crash.
 
You will never and I mean never, ride a sportbike, accelerate, and be able to kick another rider off their bike. I imagine you could walk and chew gum at the same time if you concentrate more than you are in this thread.
Nonsense. I'm a former club racer of no great distinction, but can tell you, I've seen other club racers do stuff like this (including grabbing other riders brakes at 120 Mph) - but you're saying "The GOAT" is not capable of lifting his leg while in motion??? Uhhh.. they do it dozens of time per race.

Screen Shot 2024-02-28 at 6.47.02 PM.png
 
I think the only reason Marc went down is because his brake lever hit Rossi's leg or part of Rossi's bike.
He went down down because Rossi made a non racing move, looked where MM was back over his shoulder slowed down and ran wide to force MM off the track. That Rossi specifically aimed a kick at MM’s brake lever was always fanciful, but any contact was due to Rossi trying to force MM off the track.
 
He got a fairly light penalty for slowing down and blocking Marc, I don't recall race direction saying anything about a kick because there wasn't one.

I see the issue is some people think that if they accept that Marc misjudged when Rossi was done blocking him and ran into Rossi's bike that means Marc was at fault for the crash. I disagree that Marc would've been at fault due to the deliberate way Rossi was blocking him in a non-racing maneuver. It's okay to admit Marc hit Rossi's bike, that's more realistic than trying to claim Rossi has supernatural abilities at everything he tries to do.

Forcing a rider to the edge of the track is punishable but in that instance it wasn't a big deal because they both had to slow down so much a crash was NOT forced. Marc understandably wanted to get by Rossi and was tired of waiting but he turned into Rossi's bike. I hold Rossi responsible for that, BUT Rossi did NOT force Marc to turn into him. Had Marc judged a bit better and waited .5 seconds he never would've hit Rossi's bike and there wouldn't have been a crash (at least not at that corner, but they probably would've kept up the battle until something happened).

A still picture doesn't show anything clearly, watching the video shows Rossi leg was stationary on the peg until you see Marc's bike lean further to the right making contact with Rossi's bike.

The racing line doesn't apply when Rossi's non-racing maneuver caused them to slow down so much. Marc would not have completely run off track if he didn't turn in exactly at that moment, he was not moving fast enough. I agree Rossi was at fault, I just look at the situation realistically instead of trying to embellish it with tales of kicks and knee flicks that send other riders flying.

MV, sit tight as what I am going to type may start a little hard but then soften.

Your continued defence of Rossi is admirable but to me it is somewhat misguided with the wordings you are using which are or may give the perception that Marquez was the one that caused the issue by riding into Rossi and that MM could have avoided the contact by choosing a different path or direction at turn point. I do totally note that you fully recognise that VR's actions were poor and totally uncalled for in a race situation, that action being the slow down and push MM out.

To me, MM had no option of when to turn and VR knew this and thus, as he had done all that weekend he played the man and not the situation. VR would likely have slowed if MM slowed or accelerated if MM tried to accelerate past - VR was consumed by the red mist of anger and for me had lost all semblance of calm and allowed that to impact his clear thinking. At that point, he was an extreme danger on track to himself, MM (obviously) and possibly others should they get hooked up in his pursuit of MM.

VR got out of that race light in penalty terms. He should have received firmer penalty or been disqualified for his actions of slowing on a race line, slowing to force a rider offline/wide and then avoidable contact with another rider forcing that rider to fall.

That said, and totally in a greement with you, I do not feel that VR kicked MM off his bike but rather what occurred was an outcome or consequence of VR's poor behaviour, but let us also not forget that VR has kicked riders in the past.

The admission in the video below that he wanted to slow/stop to ask MM f*ck - is enough indication that Penalty should have been greater (IMO)




I think the only reason Marc went down is because his brake lever hit Rossi's leg or part of Rossi's bike.

Yes and no. Totally IMO here and as mentioned earlier the words used are crritical to perception of blame (ie. MM turned in to and contacted VR's bike insinuates MM as culpable/contributary).

For mine, the contact was caused by MM's need to turn in or run off track and VR's continuing on the line to the outside of the corner (this kind of aligns to a comment of yours). While MM may have been able to avoid the contact by picking up the bike and running wider, his mindset would have been on racing and he woudl have been expecting VR to resume racing given that VR had successfully disrupted him. VR was in control of that situation as he knew what he wanted to do, knew he was not racing but I do not think he anticipated MM's turn-in but rather expected to continue to be able to push him out.



Either way, and something that for me remains unanswered is who, within team Rossi cam up with the conspiracy theory and then managed to get it so deeply into VR's head that it became an all consuming obsession that distracted VR to the point we saw?

Up until that point, VR was rarely flustered in the public eye but something or someone found a way to ruin things for him (not withstanding his own part in the whole shenenigans) and destroy him mentally. Personally, I feel that Sepang 2015 was a significant turning point in people's perception of VR as the fun-loving joker into something more sinister (not talking the purely obsessed here either) and resulted in a level of destruction of legacy.

I remember typing somewhere at the time, and it remains one of my prime thoughts but I do hope that VR had people with him around that time that were genuiinely watching his mental health, as all evidence at the time was not that of a healthy individual (yes, controlling maybe but he was unhealthy)

That said, what I have seen around the Bathurst 12 hour would indicate that he may well be back to enjoying himself again, as it is safe to say (IMO) that he so wanted title 10 that it may have become a little unhealthy.
 
Last edited:
MV, sit tight as what I am going to type may start a little hard but then soften.

Your continued defence of Rossi is admirable but to me it is somewhat misguided with the wordings you are using which are or may give the perception that Marquez was the one that caused the issue by riding into Rossi and that MM could have avoided the contact by choosing a different path or direction at turn point. I do totally note that you fully recognise that VR's actions were poor and totally uncalled for in a race situation, that action being the slow down and push MM out.

To me, MM had no option of when to turn and VR knew this and thus, as he had done all that weekend he played the man and not the situation. VR would likely have slowed if MM slowed or accelerated if MM tried to accelerate past - VR was consumed by the red mist of anger and for me had lost all semblance of calm and allowed that to impact his clear thinking. At that point, he was an extreme danger on track to himself, MM (obviously) and possibly others should they get hooked up in his pursuit of MM.

VR got out of that race light in penalty terms. He should have received firmer penalty or been disqualified for his actions of slowing on a race line, slowing to force a rider offline/wide and then avoidable contact with another rider forcing that rider to fall.

That said, and totally in a greement with you, I do not feel that VR kicked MM off his bike but rather what occurred was an outcome or consequence of VR's poor behaviour, but let us also not forget that VR has kicked riders in the past.

The admission in the video below that he wanted to slow/stop to ask MM f*ck - is enough indication that Penalty should have been greater (IMO)






Yes and no. Totally IMO here and as mentioned earlier the words used are crritical to perception of blame (ie. MM turned in to and contacted VR's bike insinuates MM as culpable/contributary).

For mine, the contact was caused by MM's need to turn in or run off track and VR's continuing on the line to the outside of the corner (this kind of aligns to a comment of yours). While MM may have been able to avoid the contact by picking up the bike and running wider, his mindset would have been on racing and he woudl have been expecting VR to resume racing given that VR had successfully disrupted him. VR was in control of that situation as he knew what he wanted to do, knew he was not racing but I do not think he anticipated MM's turn-in but rather expected to continue to be able to push him out.



Either way, and something that for me remains unanswered is who, within team Rossi cam up with the conspiracy theory and then managed to get it so deeply into VR's head that it became an all consuming obsession that distracted VR to the point we saw?

Up until that point, VR was rarely flustered in the public eye but something or someone found a way to ruin things for him (not withstanding his own part in the whole shenenigans) and destroy him mentally. Personally, I feel that Sepang 2015 was a significant turning point in people's perception of VR as the fun-loving joker into something more sinister (not talking the purely obsessed here either) and resulted in a level of destruction of legacy.

I remember typing somewhere at the time, and it remains one of my prime thoughts but I do hope that VR had people with him around that time that were genuiinely watching his mental health, as all evidence at the time was not that of a healthy individual (yes, controlling maybe but he was unhealthy)

That said, what I have seen around the Bathurst 12 hour would indicate that he may well be back to enjoying himself again, as it is safe to say (IMO) that he so wanted title 10 that it may have become a little unhealthy.

As I recall Icvio
 
Forcing a rider to the edge of the track is punishable but in that instance it wasn't a big deal because they both had to slow down so much a crash was NOT forced. Marc understandably wanted to get by Rossi and was tired of waiting but he turned into Rossi's bike. I hold Rossi responsible for that, BUT Rossi did NOT force Marc to turn into him. Had Marc judged a bit better and waited .5 seconds he never would've hit Rossi's bike and there wouldn't have been a crash (at least not at that corner, but they probably would've kept up the battle until something happened).

A still picture doesn't show anything clearly, watching the video shows Rossi leg was stationary on the peg until you see Marc's bike lean further to the right making contact with Rossi's bike.
RD, hardly known Rossi haters, ruled that Rossii caused the crash. The only thing more fanciful than Rossi deliberately and successfully targeting MM’s brake llever is that MM somehow caused the crash, his other choice was riding off the track which might have made him crash as well.

I tend to agree with David Emmett’s take at the time that both riders had been allowed to get away with things for years, neither the Gibernau last corner pass or MM’s te-creation of it with Lorenzo in the Gibernau role were legitimate imo.

You will defend almost anything Rossi has done, quite often thoughtfully, but I still haven’t heard any explanation as to how Rossi’s claim in the pre-Sepang press conference was reasonable or even rational, even from you.
 
Talking of David Emmett (wish he would post back here like he did in days gone by), I seem to recall in one of his articles that he said something like "few people outside his inner circle believe the conspiracy theory he projected at Sepang"
 
MV, sit tight as what I am going to type may start a little hard but then soften.

Your continued defence of Rossi is admirable but to me it is somewhat misguided with the wordings you are using which are or may give the perception that Marquez was the one that caused the issue by riding into Rossi and that MM could have avoided the contact by choosing a different path or direction at turn point. I do totally note that you fully recognise that VR's actions were poor and totally uncalled for in a race situation, that action being the slow down and push MM out.

To me, MM had no option of when to turn and VR knew this and thus, as he had done all that weekend he played the man and not the situation. VR would likely have slowed if MM slowed or accelerated if MM tried to accelerate past - VR was consumed by the red mist of anger and for me had lost all semblance of calm and allowed that to impact his clear thinking. At that point, he was an extreme danger on track to himself, MM (obviously) and possibly others should they get hooked up in his pursuit of MM.

VR got out of that race light in penalty terms. He should have received firmer penalty or been disqualified for his actions of slowing on a race line, slowing to force a rider offline/wide and then avoidable contact with another rider forcing that rider to fall.

That said, and totally in a greement with you, I do not feel that VR kicked MM off his bike but rather what occurred was an outcome or consequence of VR's poor behaviour, but let us also not forget that VR has kicked riders in the past.

The admission in the video below that he wanted to slow/stop to ask MM f*ck - is enough indication that Penalty should have been greater (IMO)






Yes and no. Totally IMO here and as mentioned earlier the words used are crritical to perception of blame (ie. MM turned in to and contacted VR's bike insinuates MM as culpable/contributary).

For mine, the contact was caused by MM's need to turn in or run off track and VR's continuing on the line to the outside of the corner (this kind of aligns to a comment of yours). While MM may have been able to avoid the contact by picking up the bike and running wider, his mindset would have been on racing and he woudl have been expecting VR to resume racing given that VR had successfully disrupted him. VR was in control of that situation as he knew what he wanted to do, knew he was not racing but I do not think he anticipated MM's turn-in but rather expected to continue to be able to push him out.



Either way, and something that for me remains unanswered is who, within team Rossi cam up with the conspiracy theory and then managed to get it so deeply into VR's head that it became an all consuming obsession that distracted VR to the point we saw?

Up until that point, VR was rarely flustered in the public eye but something or someone found a way to ruin things for him (not withstanding his own part in the whole shenenigans) and destroy him mentally. Personally, I feel that Sepang 2015 was a significant turning point in people's perception of VR as the fun-loving joker into something more sinister (not talking the purely obsessed here either) and resulted in a level of destruction of legacy.

I remember typing somewhere at the time, and it remains one of my prime thoughts but I do hope that VR had people with him around that time that were genuiinely watching his mental health, as all evidence at the time was not that of a healthy individual (yes, controlling maybe but he was unhealthy)

That said, what I have seen around the Bathurst 12 hour would indicate that he may well be back to enjoying himself again, as it is safe to say (IMO) that he so wanted title 10 that it may have become a little unhealthy.

As I recall Uccio later proudly announced it was he who detected MM’s perfidy at PI 2015 from post race analysis.

I have always said that if Rossi had noticed something during the race it would have had more credibility, while still being wrong imo. MM was out of the title race because he had crashed out early in races at least 5 times, and he certainly was under no obligation to keep doing so. If he raced harder later in the race when the bike came to him how is that illegitimate ?, particularly since he eventually greeted the chequered flag first.
 
Lex was more up on all this at the time but basically in all the European rounds which were a majority of the rounds Michelin evaluated the conditions in practice and produced SNS tites overnight for their top runners if not every Michelin shod rider. Bridgestone could only do this for the odd Asian round, so in general Michelin had the advantage, but Bridgestone had to develop an all round tyre. When SNS tyres were outlawed which was iirc for the 2007 season, as I recall with Valentino’s approval even, the tables were turned, or Valentino thought so anyway since he demanded Bridgestones for 2008, the last year before the control tire. Lex who is not uncommonly very astute has always maintained they dumbed down the Bridgestones which had been developed to particularly suit the Ducati in that last year of 2008, although I recall no complaint from Casey Stoner, not noted for being backward in complaining. The Michelin qualifying tites continued to be superior, I don’t recall Bridgestone ever really developing such tires during the tire war years.
Motegi 2010. Jorge who was faster at that stage in the race had caught up with Rossi and could have clinched the title by overtaking Rossi to finish 3rd. Rossi did the patented Rossi thing and immediately re-passed him every time he overtook, very similar to MM at Sepang 2015 imo. Jorge eventually gave up and settled for 4th. It was not exactly the same circumstance,, basically Jorge couldn’t lose the title because the only other rider with a mathematical chance, Dani Pedrosa, got injured that weekend. I wasn’t such a Lorenzo fan back then and didn’t have much problem with Rossi contesting him given the real title situation.
 
Lex was more up on all this at the time but basically in all the European rounds which were a majority of the rounds Michelin evaluated the conditions in practice and produced SNS tites overnight for their top runners if not every Michelin shod rider. Bridgestone could only do this for the odd Asian round, so in general Michelin had the advantage, but Bridgestone had to develop an all round tyre. When SNS tyres were outlawed which was iirc for the 2007 season, as I recall with Valentino’s approval even, the tables were turned, or Valentino thought so anyway since he demanded Bridgestones for 2008, the last year before the control tire. Lex who is not uncommonly very astute has always maintained they dumbed down the Bridgestones which had been developed to particularly suit the Ducati in that last year of 2008, although I recall no complaint from Casey Stoner, not noted for being backward in complaining. The Michelin qualifying tites continued to be superior, I don’t recall Bridgestone ever really developing such tires during the tire war years.
IIRC Stoner did ask to go back to the 2007 tyre as he felt it suited the Duc better and was told no by Bridgestone.
 
I've heard it's to help slow down, but I've always seen it as used to block passes.
IIRC Rossi himself tested the difference on using the leg and not using the leg and said it was the same time but the leg dangle felt more natural or something to that context. Because he is Rossi everyone (bar Lorenzo) copied the move.
I do think it is an ingenius way to make passes and block passes that bit harder though so I am in agreement with you there.
 
He went down down because Rossi made a non racing move, looked where MM was back over his shoulder slowed down and ran wide to force MM off the track. That Rossi specifically aimed a kick at MM’s brake lever was always fanciful, but any contact was due to Rossi trying to force MM off the track.
To be fair to MV he isn't denying that the incident is Rossi's fault. He is saying that Marc misjudged when he thought Rossi would turn back in and resume racing which caused him. He has not absovled Rossi of his crime, which shows a good amount of impartiality when looking at the incident. All he is saying from what I can tell is that Marquez hitting Rossi and his brake lever, hitting Rossi's bike or leg is what caused him to go down. If that doesn't happen there is likely still contact but Marquez stays on his bike and tbh god knows what happens after that.
 
Talking of David Emmett (wish he would post back here like he did in days gone by), I seem to recall in one of his articles that he said something like "few people outside his inner circle believe the conspiracy theory he projected at Sepang"
That is just untrue. Lots of people outside of his inner circle but who want to be in it believe it.
 
To be fair to MV he isn't denying that the incident is Rossi's fault. He is saying that Marc misjudged when he thought Rossi would turn back in and resume racing which caused him. He has not absovled Rossi of his crime, which shows a good amount of impartiality when looking at the incident. All he is saying from what I can tell is that Marquez hitting Rossi and his brake lever, hitting Rossi's bike or leg is what caused him to go down. If that doesn't happen there is likely still contact but Marquez stays on his bike and tbh god knows what happens after that.
That is exactly what I'm saying. Rossi's non-racing manuever resulted in Marc hitting Rossi, but Rossi never kicked him (Rossi is still to blame). I believe that if Marc didn't get his brake lever pinched, he would not have crashed but would've came back at Rossi in the next corner even harder. It was going to be the final lap of the race for one or both of them.
 
That is exactly what I'm saying. Rossi's non-racing manuever resulted in Marc hitting Rossi, but Rossi never kicked him (Rossi is still to blame). I believe that if Marc didn't get his brake lever pinched, he would not have crashed but would've came back at Rossi in the next corner even harder. It was going to be the final lap of the race for one or both of them.
It was the last lap of the race for Marquez because of Rossi's actions.
I do not see Marquez deliberately running Rossi to the edge of the track in a similar manner. Stuffing it up the inside on corner entry yes but slowing and pushing Rossi off the circuit? No.
Yes it should have been the last lap for both of them as VR should have been black flagged.
 
MV, sit tight as what I am going to type may start a little hard but then soften.

Your continued defence of Rossi is admirable but to me it is somewhat misguided with the wordings you are using which are or may give the perception that Marquez was the one that caused the issue by riding into Rossi and that MM could have avoided the contact by choosing a different path or direction at turn point. I do totally note that you fully recognise that VR's actions were poor and totally uncalled for in a race situation, that action being the slow down and push MM out.

To me, MM had no option of when to turn and VR knew this and thus, as he had done all that weekend he played the man and not the situation. VR would likely have slowed if MM slowed or accelerated if MM tried to accelerate past - VR was consumed by the red mist of anger and for me had lost all semblance of calm and allowed that to impact his clear thinking. At that point, he was an extreme danger on track to himself, MM (obviously) and possibly others should they get hooked up in his pursuit of MM.

VR got out of that race light in penalty terms. He should have received firmer penalty or been disqualified for his actions of slowing on a race line, slowing to force a rider offline/wide and then avoidable contact with another rider forcing that rider to fall.

That said, and totally in a greement with you, I do not feel that VR kicked MM off his bike but rather what occurred was an outcome or consequence of VR's poor behaviour, but let us also not forget that VR has kicked riders in the past.

The admission in the video below that he wanted to slow/stop to ask MM f*ck - is enough indication that Penalty should have been greater (IMO)






Yes and no. Totally IMO here and as mentioned earlier the words used are crritical to perception of blame (ie. MM turned in to and contacted VR's bike insinuates MM as culpable/contributary).

For mine, the contact was caused by MM's need to turn in or run off track and VR's continuing on the line to the outside of the corner (this kind of aligns to a comment of yours). While MM may have been able to avoid the contact by picking up the bike and running wider, his mindset would have been on racing and he woudl have been expecting VR to resume racing given that VR had successfully disrupted him. VR was in control of that situation as he knew what he wanted to do, knew he was not racing but I do not think he anticipated MM's turn-in but rather expected to continue to be able to push him out.



Either way, and something that for me remains unanswered is who, within team Rossi cam up with the conspiracy theory and then managed to get it so deeply into VR's head that it became an all consuming obsession that distracted VR to the point we saw?

Up until that point, VR was rarely flustered in the public eye but something or someone found a way to ruin things for him (not withstanding his own part in the whole shenenigans) and destroy him mentally. Personally, I feel that Sepang 2015 was a significant turning point in people's perception of VR as the fun-loving joker into something more sinister (not talking the purely obsessed here either) and resulted in a level of destruction of legacy.

I remember typing somewhere at the time, and it remains one of my prime thoughts but I do hope that VR had people with him around that time that were genuiinely watching his mental health, as all evidence at the time was not that of a healthy individual (yes, controlling maybe but he was unhealthy)

That said, what I have seen around the Bathurst 12 hour would indicate that he may well be back to enjoying himself again, as it is safe to say (IMO) that he so wanted title 10 that it may have become a little unhealthy.

I think we agree on most points.

Our behavior is controlled by our beliefs, once Rossi believed that Marc was attempting to sabotage his chance to win his last title that resulted in a big behavior change from Rossi. These guys make it to the top level in sports due to have a great deal of passion and obsession. It may not take much to cause a meltdown because they're already operating at an extreme limit of motivation. Having a good inner circle can help them stay grounded, but Rossi may have been surrounded with "yes men" and nobody dared to give him an alternative view of the situation with Marc.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top