I wanted to expound upon something Arrab said much, much earlier regarding precedent set by what happened today, and how that impacts the future of motor racing.
Formula 1 saw a huge uptick in dangerous driving maneuvers and all sorts of dangerous defensive maneuvers such as chop blocking, squeezing drivers, and etc. in the 1980s. Part of it was due to Ayrton Senna, the man in my avatar. So no one mistakes me, while I love Senna, I have never been at peace with how he drove at times as he engaged in the sort of .... that actually VR doesn't even have the balls to do. Estoril, 1988, over a perceived slight of being passed (sound familiar?) he attempted to run Alain Prost into the pit wall at Estoril at 190MPH. Nothing was done in terms of penalties. He had run-ins with every top driver during that era. However the only one who fought back was Nigel Mansell, and he never backed down to Senna going as far to brake check him in the rain causing a big accident as payback for all of the things Senna had done to him over the years.
The problem arose in the wake of the incidents with Alain Prost at Suzuka in 1989, and then 1990, the FIA stood silent. Unfortunately this was a catastrophic mistake on their part because it sent a message to the younger generations that racing as a contact sport was perfectly acceptable. Michael Schumacher built upon what Senna did, and did even far worse, and ironically Senna was Michael's idol. See, this is learned behavior. When you see your idols getting away with it and winning as a result without punishment, it sends a message to everyone that it will be condoned. What ultimately happened is that in the wake of Senna's death in 1994, the situation got progressively worse as the decade went on. How there were no deaths as a result of the uptick in dangerous driving by many drivers is still a mystery to me. Some may remember Robert Kubica's horrific crash at Montreal 2007 where his entire car just disintegrated and he walked away unscathed. Do you know what precipitated the crash though? Jarno Trulli squeezed him onto the grass on the run down to the hairpin. There was no penalty given out for it. F1 has a huge problem with dangerous driving because much like in MotoGP race control chose to do nothing.
What happened today, to tie it back to Arrab's comments, sent a message to the kids who worship Valentino, that if you're frustrated on the circuit, punting your opponent is perfectly acceptable. This is why the penalty was chickenshit because this was the perfect time to send a huge message to not only Valentino, but everyone watching grand prix motorcycle racing that behavior like this will not be tolerated period. This was important to do as Valentino chose to do it at the site of Marco Simoncelli's death, which was just bad.
Instead, he gets to ride at Valencia. Yes he starts from the back of the grid, but if he manages to somehow win the world championship, the message it has now sent to all riders is that behaving like this might get you in trouble, but it still worked out for Valentino. He won his 8th premier class title in spite of it, so who really gives as ....?
Dangerous precedent.