MotoGP: 2015 Round 17 - Shell Malaysia Motorcycle Grand Prix (SPOILERS)

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Can we imagine if Rossi would have fallen instead of Marc? Good lord the Internet would have broke.
 
Last edited:
Can we imagine if Rossi would have fallen instead of Marc? Good lord the Internet would have broke.

Like Bayliss said, those two would not have been able to battle like that all race long. One or both of them was going down eventually.
 
Jesus GAZ, take MM's .... out of your mouth and focus your one remaining brain cell at the simple fact MM was running his race till he saw lorenzo on his board, he dropped Lorenzo and had no intention of battling him or for the race win as his laptimes and qualifying times would suggest he was capable of winning. Instead, he made the DIRTY, classless, ....... move of interfering with the series points leader because why?

There was only one possible thing to gain, to satisfy his ego and cost him more time between VR and JL, with the fact he had more pace all weekend, it's no problem for him to constantly interrupt VR all race long.

Lets even say VR doesn't dispense of MM like the little clueless, classless, pathetic loser ..... he has proven to be all season. Lets say VR just rides his race constantly loosing time to the only relevant rider on the track(JL) now after loosing time for 5 laps positions 3,4,5,6 are all bunched up, and there is NO guarantee that VR will be in 3rd when the checker flag swings.

that's why a rider with NO numerical possibility of winning a championship has only one job when the points leader comes around, don't do anything to mess up the points leaders race, they have earned it, and you had your chance to be the leader in every race up to this one. On day, YOU might be that racer in the lead, do you want a 5th place hack to take you out when they have NO possibility of winning the overall points race?

It's pretty obvious you don't race, as you have no clue, so i'll spell it out for you. As the series comes to an end, all riders in the lead become more conservative and take fewer chances. Typically, if they are winning by a large margin, the scale it back MORE taking a 3rd instead of risking a 1st fight with someone with NOTHING to loose.

In VR's case, he's only got a short lead, so he HAS to stay close to JL at all costs, even putting down a classless little ..... like MM that only has two championships because he was the only rider with a seamless gearbox for two years, thank you honda/dorna same thing. Now everyone but the suzukies have it and MM isn't even in the points cause he's SO OVERRATED in the talent department. Fortunatly, MM and his Ego believe they can take on the GOAT and VR has consistently put this ..... down every time! This is no different, desperate, pathetic looser MM can't admit he's been beaten badly by the GOAT and both Yamaha's.
 
I am curious how the other riders are going to handle this. What's the point of chasing a championship that will allow a rider that has NO numerical possibility of winning the championship to effectively take the points leader OUT of the race at will.

What happens if next year that's Dani? or Dovi? or Iannonie? or Crutchlow? or Smith? or any other rider, is it going to be OK for MM to take them out after 15 races too?

Just because that over rated little prick crashes his way through the season or gets ..... slapped through the season next year, just like this year?

If they don't set MM straight NOW, those limp .... losers deserve to never win a championship. What they do in Valencia will determine their own future chances in MotoGP.
 
So you believe that two wrongs can make a right?

Hey here is an idea, what say next year we get Gibber back and have him punt Rossi as retribution for Jerez.

What of all the others over the years who feel aggrieved …………. Is it now ok to take physical retribution for a non-physical act?

But all good, I am sure that we can implement a system that as each rider is mathematically not able to win the championship we shall tell them not to turn up and complete their seasons. Sounds fair.

no, but it´s not all black and white like you make it seem. if you would have read my whole post(s)...i said no one would complain about this kind of racing between two direct competitors. and no one would talk about it if marquez (in the situation he is in...no chance at all at the title) would have tried to counter for a couple of turns, and or at least IF HE WOULD HAVE SHOWN THE SAME FIGHTING SPIRIT AGAINST LORENZO, but he didnt. he didn´t care if he or rossi would have crashed out of the race. he didn´t try to get the best possible result for him (second or even first). all he did was srewing with another rider, which actually had a chance at the title.

if he is faster than both (like he obviousely was over the whole weekend until rossi showed up behind him), than race to your best and fight to win.

or, if all of a sudden you struggle to keep up with (only) one of two possible champions (because of breaking problems, (only his) tires not gaining temperature, sudden race induced front fork problems), than yes, put up a clean fight, but if you get overtaken continousely and only can fight back by going all in, as he wants us to believe - against only one of two cempetitors for the championship - than yes, at some point it´s up to you (marquez) to realize, it´s actually not up to you to, by borderline maneuvering, decide who deserves - in his humble opinion - to be champion.

gentlemens agreement, unwritten law, what ever you like to call it...it´s as easy as this...

but yes, just going by the rules, marquez did nothing wrong. but again, or at least try to, look at it completely unbiased. the whole sitaution. one rider has nothing to lose, could actually fight to win this race, instead decides to mess with the championship leader in a way that clearly signaled "i don´t care if one or both of us hit the dirt"...
 
Jesus GAZ, take MM's .... out of your mouth and focus your one remaining brain cell at the simple fact MM was running his race till he saw lorenzo on his board, he dropped Lorenzo and had no intention of battling him or for the race win as his laptimes and qualifying times would suggest he was capable of winning. Instead, he made the DIRTY, classless, ....... move of interfering with the series points leader because why?

i DON'T USUALLY STOOP TO LEVELS OF NAME CALLING BUT FOR YOU i MAY MAKE AN EXCEPTION IF YOU WOULD LIKE ...................

That said, MM's .... is nowhere near my mouth although I may ask if your ... is sufficiently lubed for Rossi or do you allow the god to go in dry?

Now, again, show me in a rule book where MM broke the rules as written ............ you cannot as there are no rules that cover his action but rules do cover those actions of Rossi

I do fully realise that you likely see yellow, pee yellow, .... yellow, have Rossi undies and .......... with Rossi body lotion and as such it is extremely difficult for you to look outside the marvellous world of your GOAT, God, Messiah and the church and so I will allow you a little leeway in your sojourn from crash.net.

If you subscribe to your view (and given the level of masturbation that must have been occurring throughout the year with Rossi’s performance I am glad you are still capable of vision) then two wrongs make a right which means that if other riders feel aggrieved by Rossi then they can knock him off the bike. Sound fair?



It's pretty obvious you don't race, as you have no clue, so i'll spell it out for you. As the series comes to an end, all riders in the lead become more conservative and take fewer chances. Typically, if they are winning by a large margin, the scale it back MORE taking a 3rd instead of risking a 1st fight with someone with NOTHING to loose.

Nope, you got me, I don’t race and nor will I put my resume on here for you but will say that I have ridden road bikes for 30 years, but that is irrelevant.

What I do, is often work in the positions that make the decisions …………… sometimes in a tower, sometimes with radios and sometimes with flags. I have officiated in a manner at around 100 race meetings over the last few years so in your eyes that may make me not able to adjudge but I would back my judgement over your obvious ‘keyboard warrior like racing’ skills anyday.

Oh, do you race by the way?

Given I was asked I mean why should I also not ask?



May I also suggest that you lay of the anger pills, you have just turned up (and I have suspicions here) from another forum and have come in jack boot and all ………. Awesome but you now look like your master ……………. Dickheaded and petulant



Oh, and FWIW, I will thank you for somehow linking me to MM as I am far from a fan (suggest you use the search function and look back) having usually been called a CS fan by people of the yellow fraternity.
 
Last edited:
i don't understand why dani kents team mates didn't take out olivera, it's certified OK by Dorna, they missed an opportunity to pull a Marquez and control the series winners.
 
Jerez 2005, the wall, strong-arming Bridgestone into unwillingly supplying him tires, Laguna 2008, and Motegi 2010. It came back around to bite Rossi. He couldn't stand it.
 
no, but it´s not all black and white like you make it seem. if you would have read my whole post(s)...i said no one would complain about this kind of racing between two direct competitors. and no one would talk about it if marquez (in the situation he is in...no chance at all at the title) would have tried to counter for a couple of turns, and or at least IF HE WOULD HAVE SHOWN THE SAME FIGHTING SPIRIT AGAINST LORENZO, but he didnt. he didn´t care if he or rossi would have crashed out of the race. he didn´t try to get the best possible result for him (second or even first). all he did was srewing with another rider, which actually had a chance at the title.

Actually it is black and white as to who broke rules and who did not - read the FIM rule book that governs MotoGP

What is not black and white, but is gray are a few different aspects but given that MM by his actions did not break a rule, than officially he cannot be sanctioned and nor should he be.

The point that the yellow people amongst us seem to be focuses on is 'what if MM took Rossi out of the race' (and a fair comment), but the facts are that did not happen and Racing Direction have determined that it worked the other way.

Fact is a decision has been made by RD and from reports the original appeal has been lost.

This will not cost Rossi the title as he remains some 7 points in front and it will take JL to win Valencia which is questionable as he will be riding safely which will mean potentially slower whilst Rossi will move forward quickly as he always does.

I also further suspect that RD will very closely monitor the behaviour of MM should VR get close and so that will assist VR if he is quick enough as MM will know that he is being watched

Expect a press release regarding a stern talking to prior to the race
 
odd, riders with competitive nature and class...very unique these days. Dorna should do something about that, can't have it. We're in the marquez era, were winning is the only thing that counts, even if you can't win.

Perhaps Olivera or his team mate will pull the marquez approach and take out kent in valencia, olivera's the new champ. Be less obious, if we can get the the 4th/5th place rider not on the same team to take kent out.
 
Last edited:
Jerez 2005, the wall, strong-arming Bridgestone into unwillingly supplying him tires, Laguna 2008, and Motegi 2010. It came back around to bite Rossi. He couldn't stand it.

But it is all Marquez's fault ........... :p
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top