- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Messages
- 11,383
- Location
- Pomona NY
Please, the journos have little interest in admitting that the real reason the RCV hasn't looked like a worldbeater this year is because the other bike [M1] has caught up to it.
Oh good god, look at you with your straw man argument. Where the .... did I say anything about MM not being talented? I'm on record as stating he is talented, but a moron in between the ears hence the string of bad luck. He could easily have crashed out at Assen.
No one made the claim it's so good it can ride itself.
I believe the argument made is that it's a very good bike that just didn't make a step forward that was at least equal to the step forward that the M1 made. Hence why the gap between the Yamaha and Honda is much smaller from 2014 to 2015.
I have been arguing for the last month that there's nothing really that wrong with the RCV. Stop trying to twist it into an either/or proposition since myself, nor Jums even made that ridiculous claim you're trying to attribute to us.
Notice how there were 5 components that were at fault for the supposed "underperforming" of the RCV and suddenly nothing is being mentioned now?
-Chassis
-Brakes
-Swingarm
-Flywheel
-Engine
Why is this?
Maybe because all of those supposed problems were nothing more than red herrings.
There's all these vague allusions from MM about how Honda "is close" and that things have "improved" yet no mention of anything other than the supposed improved braking feel that has gotten with the reversion of the 2014 chassis.
A few weeks ago he was blaming Casey Stoner for the bike being garbage.
Now all of a sudden it's just fine?
lol he's a moron.
Rank technical amateur that would blame the sun being at the wrong angle in the sky if he failed to take a corner at the speed he intended to.
If we both agree that he's not lacking in ability - then what else would account for the fact that he's had such a dreadful season thus far?
Sorry - you're relatively new around here. "The bike can ride itself" has for years been short-hand for the rider is without merit; an assertion made time and again by boppers about Stoner.
The Five Possiblities as it were - were theories mooted about. That not all five are likely to be true - doesn't ergo rule out that one or more of these things were the issue.
All of a sudden? Dude... how many races has MM struggled to even get on the podium. In the relatively short period that comprises the MGP season - that's a long time, especially given the reasonable assumption that Honda was throwing every possible resource into the mix to fix the problem.
And I can see one or two or three journos perhaps being less than objective - but pretty much all of them? Besides - according to you and Jum - Rossi has everybody down to the french fry chefs at the hamburger stand in his pocket. Going by that way of thinking - the journos should by all lights be saying Rossi has "broken" MM, or Rossi has triumphed over the evil empire's riders despite the massively unfair advantage of the Hondas. Your implication would appear to be that all the journos in the paddock are somehow beholden to Marquez or Honda and incapable of objective reporting. So only you and your fellow arm chair expert have more insight into this situation than all the professional journalists? Hey... if that fits your narrative - go with it.
Re: nothing being mentioned now. MM reverted to the 2014 frame and his crew sorted out the problems. That's what engineers do. The fact that Honda hasn't published a detailed report of all the tricks and refinements required shouldn't be a huge surprise to you. The companies only reveal as much as they want the competitors to know.
Whatever refinements Honda accomplished were, they were clearly effective. Not only did MM win... but he won by a huge margin. And Pedrosa (who admittedly loves Sachsenring) had his best showing of the season. Coincidence? I think not.
Last edited: