The Bridgestone vs. Michelin Method
Memories fade quickly, so the comment that was heard in Termas that "These things didn’t happen with Bridgestone," is, again, a half-truth. Of course there were problems with Bridgestone, some of them serious, but it’s no less true that there is a substantial difference between how each is managed.
The Bridgestone management never gave room for discussion because the tires were manufactured in Japan, or in the Japanese style, with Bridgestone deciding what tires were to be used at a particular GP a month or two ahead of time, and those were the tires they had, period. In fact, hard compounds were more unusable than usable, so the riders had no alternatives.
In Michelin’s case, it seems that the French manufacturer is constantly attempting to prove their production prowess and speed of reaction that Bridgestone could never even think of. Michelin has proven over time on this return to the championship they can produce new tires and send them to the other side of the world in almost a week. And it seems that with this strategy they complicate things for themselves. An “insecurity” that seems unnecessary, because after some understandably doubtful beginnings, Michelin supplies a material that allows the riders to go faster and faster with a rate of crashes that is more than acceptable. Something on which all the riders currently agree.