3528991370286565
Really, most people on the forum didn't know part of the prize of setting pole was getting a watch? They only mention it all the time, not to mention, they make rider replicas for the purpose of marketing, which is basically all the .... they wear, from hats to glasses, to watches, to sport bottle drinks with respective logos, etc.
No, no no. That is actually Espargaro's helmet. His head has shrank quite a bit since a certain Brit has been putting him in his place. Despite seemingly having his head cut off by Cal, its actually Redding doing the head shrinking.
I digress.
Anyway, I'd like to challenge a claim I read on Kropos race round up (either his or from some official claim), who said Marc's crash was the fastest ever in MotoGP. It seems even while crashing, when Marc does it, its faster and better than everybody else. I read various tweets and they had Marc's crash somewhere at 225-250kph (Krops has it well over 300-340kph) so this begs the question, at what point did the 'crash' occur, that is, at what speed did he hit the deck? I mean just one crash that immediately comes to mind, and I may be wrong, but wasn't John Hopkin's mechanical crash at Assen in 2008 faster? Surely there have been others at near or over 300kph that I can't think of at the moment. Certainly the tire wall Hopkins hit was 10X more dangerous than the wall Marc didn't hit. Marc's crash was nasty and spectacular enough, I hope its not necessary to inflate it and certainly not pronounce walls more dangerous depending on the rider that comes within its contact?
Also, one more ....... comment/question from your resident ....... (sorry JK, get to the back of the bus where you belong); so Kropos, I'm really impressed how you worked out Cal's early race pace problems. You've narrowed it down to the fuel cell. Apparently...the fuel tank is full at the beginning of a race! Breathtaking. Cal's problem at the beginning of a race is his fuel cell, because apparently at the beginning of the race the fuel tank is full... got it.
Nah, really, so there is a difference in fuel cell design, and this according to your report accounts for a slower start than the factories? I'd honestly like to know what this conclusion is based on? (
I keep telling myself I should ditch my motogp feed and watch the Eurosport for some greater insight, but its a few more steps and I haven't got around to it, not to mention I would need to wait for the feed while I have the <u>live coverage not only at my finger tips </u>but fully paid). But surely its been said and written that this design difference is hindering the satellite Yamaha. Other than you giving us your word by simply saying the "M1 is transformed" in the latter stages when "fuel drops" (as if we have never heard countless reports by riders declaring their bike handles better with a lighter fuel load) what then exactly proves this to be a measurable handicap for the satellite squad?