By your thinking the opinion that Rossi's "genius" for feedback is validated by Furasawa et al.
They aren't my words. They're Furusawa's words (who had just retired when he made those comments).
But that applies to any factory rider (other than perhaps Iannone) - the Japanese don't go around saying that a rider provides poor feedback. You can't plausibly argue that the fact that the Japanese cannot come out and say Rossi is a poor development rider is proof that he is a poor development rider.But really, can you picture the same guys publicly saying their #1 marketing tool and Golden Child has of late lost his touch?
Also, recent history shows that Rossi's chassis feedback was correct. Zarco and Mav kept saying how the 2017 chassis concept was better than the 2016 chassis concept...then ended up conceding that they were wrong. Rossi said, all the way back at Valencia 16, that the chassis concept was not good.
Who claimed anything to the contrary? See above.Just because they haven't issued a press statement to that effect doesn't make it not so.
The logical corollary to your argument is that just because they haven't issued a press statement to that effect does not make it so.
It's fine to so speculate, but it's hard to call that a credible position when luminaries like Furusawa go out of their way to call Rossi a development genius (after retiring). I recall in the same interview that he said Lorenzo (at the time, I'm sure things have changed now) had a lot to learn when it came to bike feedback.Personally - I think it's more up to complacency in R&D and budget issues, and that Rossi's value as a developer is mostly hype. I always believed that, realistically, Rossi, being talented and a proven winner pumped up morale at Yamaha when he jumped ship, that he likely inspired people to do better work.