Jumkie
He is an exceptional rider, having more wins in the last decade than anyone other than Rossi and Lorenzo. You don't get that sort of stat by being a muppet, but like other exceptional riders to never win a championship, it highlights just how hard it really is and what an achievement.
Some may feel Marquez (and to a lesser extent, Stoner) was 'gifted' his championship, but put Crutchlow or Espargaro or Bradl on the factory Honda and they wouldn't have achieved what he (they) did. So many things have to go right - the right bike, team, setup, qualifying, tyre selection, racecraft, (and luck, in no short measure)
But, to say Pedrosa has no fire is, IMO, being disingenuous - he could have all the fire in the world, but has just met his match in Lorenzo, Stoner and Marquez. Not to mention he just could be too small for the bike - If he had 'done a Mang/Martinez/Nieto' and remained in the smaller classes, he would probably be the winningest rider of all time. No matter what he does, it takes him a particular combination of events to get a win and to get enough of them to win a championship has been just out of his reach. Apart from 2012 when he got 7 wins, he has been hitting 2-3 a year in the bigger class. Not enough to take the cup, but enough to be 2nd or 3rd in the championship on 6 occasions.
That alone demands some measure of respect.
3686851384459456
I dont get why people always say Pedro has "bad luck". He has started every season in the last 10 years with a machine/team/manufacture that could and should win the title! Pedro has no fire in his belly. This year it was his title to lose...and he did. He got the same injury as Lorenzo (who TWICE injured his collarbone), yet Lorenzo took the title down to the wire. Pedro started and finished the season on the best machine, one that actually improved throughout the year, yet he finished 3rd in the standings to his rookie teammate who he refused to challenge.
He is an exceptional rider, having more wins in the last decade than anyone other than Rossi and Lorenzo. You don't get that sort of stat by being a muppet, but like other exceptional riders to never win a championship, it highlights just how hard it really is and what an achievement.
Some may feel Marquez (and to a lesser extent, Stoner) was 'gifted' his championship, but put Crutchlow or Espargaro or Bradl on the factory Honda and they wouldn't have achieved what he (they) did. So many things have to go right - the right bike, team, setup, qualifying, tyre selection, racecraft, (and luck, in no short measure)
But, to say Pedrosa has no fire is, IMO, being disingenuous - he could have all the fire in the world, but has just met his match in Lorenzo, Stoner and Marquez. Not to mention he just could be too small for the bike - If he had 'done a Mang/Martinez/Nieto' and remained in the smaller classes, he would probably be the winningest rider of all time. No matter what he does, it takes him a particular combination of events to get a win and to get enough of them to win a championship has been just out of his reach. Apart from 2012 when he got 7 wins, he has been hitting 2-3 a year in the bigger class. Not enough to take the cup, but enough to be 2nd or 3rd in the championship on 6 occasions.
That alone demands some measure of respect.