This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

MotoGP: 2024 Round 2 Grande Prémio Tissot de Portugal

Exactly, racing incident. I can blame neither for trying what they did, though Pecco was more to blame and had more to lose.

I recall seeing an incident in F1 a few years ago where Max Verstappen as the leader, crashed with a car that was trying to unlap itself on much fresher tyres.

He was raging about it and saying how stupid it was for the other car to be doing that, with which eventual winner Hamilton agreed. But Hamilton made a good point:

"You are right, he shouldn't have been racing you. But if you had just let him past, you would have won the race"

I feel the same thing here. I don;t blame Pecco for trying to cut back. But, he should have looked at the bigger picture.
spot on with the comparison:)
 
I watch the coverage with Sylvain Guintoli who believed pecco was at fault.

I went back and watched the TNT coverage and though I didn't see/hear Guintoli's take, Hodgson sure put it on Pecco. It seems most of the paddock feels the same though everyone seems to agree it was a racing incident. Also, I found it refreshing to listen to Gavin Emmett and Hodgson call the race. Once or twice it almost sounded like I was listening to James Whitham. I liked him.
 
I went back and watched the TNT coverage and though I didn't see/hear Guintoli's take, Hodgson sure put it on Pecco. It seems most of the paddock feels the same though everyone seems to agree it was a racing incident. Also, I found it refreshing to listen to Gavin Emmett and Hodgson call the race. Once or twice it almost sounded like I was listening to James Whitham. I liked him.
Sure, I don’t consider it was a heinous act by Bagnaia deserving of a suspension or other sanction, he thought he saw a gap and went for it as has been said. It was however an error of judgement imo both to attempt a risky pass for a placing he had little or no prospect of holding for the remainder of the race when his major rival was in the process of scoring 25 points, and to think the pass was in any way on in the first place.

On this forum with an admittedly fairly strong pro-MM bias the point most MM fans are making is that whatever his form for making hard passes and perhaps being the aggressor/at fault rider in a number of previous incidents over the years may be, the pass MM made on this occasion was both feasible and successfully completed, while the re-pass attempted by Bagnaia was not, and the errors of judgement which led to the collision were pretty much entirely Bagnaia’s this time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MdubSTYLIE
I may be wrong but was Stoner passing Sete? I thought he was simply ahead of him and dropped his bike, giving Sete nowhere to go.
Yes exactly what happened as I said later in the post. Stoner was upset his mistake had caused the accident and injury, immediately apologising profusely, and I believe this affected his attitude to causing accidents going forward, including by marginal passing attempts.
 
Last edited:
Curious, did you watch how other riders took that corner on a normal lap to add context to whether or not Marc was wide? You will see that Binder was wider at that point than Marc every lap in that corner to get drive down the next straight. Add to the fact that Pecco actually had a lot of room in between him and the curb also. He could have been further inside also but he either chose to be that close to Marc or was pushing wide himself from squaring up the corner where he did. He still had to apex yet in order to get drive.
Jorge Lorenzo’s take on Crashnet is almost exactly yours. MM expanded his take that Bagnaia’s tire was shot and he was inevitably going to lose the position one way or another.
 
Hi
I tend to watch events and make up my own mind sometimes with the use of slomo when available and then see how others saw it. I don’t agree that MM took a racing line of his choice unless you add it was purely the only line where he could have attempted the pass. Coming into the corner at such a sharp angle meant he had to brake more and he did run a little deeper than he would have preferred and this allowed PP to have a view up the inside which he promptly snatched at.
i agree that what happened was that Bagnaia saw a possible gap and went for it, a racer’s instinct indeed..

Jorge Lorenzo iagrees with MDub, and with me as it happens, saying that while MM is an aggressive rider in general he did nothing wrong in this particular incident, and that Bagnaia is the one who was in a position to avoid the collision and should have accepted he had been passed. Whether or not it is fair in general to make a pass which forces an opponent to stand his bike up, a rider can’t do this if he can’t see the other rider.. Again, what did Bagnaia think MM was going to do and what result was likely other than a collision from his re-pass attempt ?.
 
In regards to the collision it would be interesting to see the lines mapped out compared with the same riders on other laps if anyone has done it
 
In regards to the collision it would be interesting to see the lines mapped out compared with the same riders on other laps if anyone has done it
I had a similar thought. There is a guy who videos for the downhill mtb world cups who overlays video of riders so you can see the different lines, speed, and who did it fastest. I thought man that would be cool to do to motogp footage. I could do it if I had access to video. I can tell you that Binder was very wide there. But everyone was hanging wide and squaring the corner up. You can see it in the marks on track.
 
At this point, I suspect Marquez got orders from higher up, to keep the juices flowing, make some show, keep everybody talking, riding like you're on tracks is boring tv.