Possible? Yes. But this wasn't the narrative was it? A few rounds ago is was the total and unmitigated collapse of the RCV. Nothing about all these other factors. Kropo, Oxley, Cameron, and Noyes had very detailed rationalizations as to why the RCV had declined to the point of being unridable. The three crash incidents were clearly rider error, but that was given little to no air time.
Allow me to refresh everyone's memory here:
Hahahaha, that's just awesome. Marc is so good WE got "tricked" into believing the Honda was brilliant, but all the while it was Marc who was the soooooo pretty and beautiful that we were blinded to the ...... RCV.
Ah, yeah, Nakamoto, what does he know, right? Maybe it was "Rob" who had a meeting with Nakamoto, and told him, hey man, forget about that Yamaha, Ducati is our real problem. We need to beat them on the straight!
I won't bother quoting Cameron, since Kropo is basically a rip off of his stuff. And Oxley, really, I need to quote him? Anyway, the point is, lets not all start forgetting these "experts" had pinpointed and nailed the problem EXCEPT of course of the very simple explanation that Marc's problems were down to ...... rider decisions and not exactly a ...... bike that has led to dropping points. He should have crashed out of Assess, which I would have loved, but as long as he gets away with that kind of ...., we will go back to forgetting what an ....... he is on the track. Man, that is the best, isn't it" I mean, when he crashes its the bikes fault, when he doesn't crash he is brilliant, and when he avoids torpedoing but crashes, we are wowed because of the skill he displayed in not torpedoing the rider in front of him whilst crashing. Its win win win situation all the time.
(Not arguing with u, just using your quote to rant.)