Actually Kesh (and I know Michael will not agree with me here either) but the priority is and should be to clear the immediate danger from teh area, irrespective of who was at fault or why the bikes are in the location and dare I suggest it (the Boner I am ........... speaking of which, is an anti-Boner a flaccid?
) in this case the marshalls did a reasonable job.
Essentially (and I have mentioned this somewhere else) it is not a marshalls job to assign fault, responsibility or culpability ............. their task is clear cut (but does need to be altered and clarified to avoid situations like Jerez 2011 and Jerez 2012 Moto3)
Where I have an issue is the subsequent actions that were performed by some (note not all) of the same marshalls.
But (and I have said this before ...... including in 2011) I will side with Rog and co in saying that IMO the marshall who did push Stoner did well over and above what I feel he should have done and that marshall does not deserve to be included, nor tarred with any criticisms (IMO)