Arrabbiata1
Blue Smoker
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
- Messages
- 6,925
- Location
- Out of Nowhere
An opinion that was largely vindicated.I didn't dismiss Stoner's claim, I just consider it his opinion... not a fact.
Stoner's initial verdict is mentioned here...
To finish first, first you must finish | Motor Sport Magazine
I remember this very well, particularly the circumstances. By the second half of the season it had become the general consensus in the paddock and press that the f & r profiles were in disharmony but in August, it was Lorenzo that credited Stoner with having first identifying this back in the Sepang pre-season test. Here's what he had originally said when asked about how the feeling over the Michelin tyres and why so many riders had crashed in the afternoon of testing.
"There's a little point after probably 45°, that it goes down just a little bit more, that it doesn't seem to match with the rear with some of the profiles that we've tested. And that gives everybody a little bit a nervous feeling, and essentially why people are struggling into Turn 5, a big fast open corner, going in, when the bike goes light, it doesn't like that feeling, and it gets the bike a little nervous, and I think that's when the front wants to break away. Everybody has been having a very similar crash there." The crashes were happening either on the way into the corner, or on the way out, both points where the rider is transitioning across that sensitive area. Other riders will just tell you, "it was a strange crash."
An interesting piece from Kropotkin demonstrating why one should be wary of dismissing feedback from Casey Stoner as mere 'opinion'.
https://motomatters.com/analysis/2016/02/05/casey_stoner_s_ducati_motogp_test_your_q.html
Changing the subject, I have to say that I was astonished by KTM's decision to opt for a screamer configuration. I was recalling the first appearance of the 990 Desmosedici in 2003 which of course was also a screamer - squirming and writhing and desperate to be unleashed within its flimsy trellis cage. Like Ducati, I wasn't at all surprised that KTM elected to work with steel given their pedigree and the rapid changes that can be effected during the development process. Unlike the 990 Ducati, power is a problem and whilst wringing as many ponies as possible from the new plant may slash a few tenths in a straight line, such a difficult combination is hardly beneficial to lap times or progressive feedback. Also perplexing, given that both riders had extensive experience on the big-bang M1. I always feel that thrusting riders into the melee of a moto gp grid on a newly designed racing motorcycle running a screamer engine is a hiding to nothing. I think back to the original M1, the Cube and the ZX-RR - all career wreckers. Small surprise then that they're testing the supposedly softer 'uneven' firing order in the future interest of mechanical grip, corner exit tyre management.
Screw Pol and Bradley's lap times, it sounds .... now.