- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 24,721
- Location
- Your Mom's House
Sloth u said u understand the differences but honestly im not sure u are making the connection that distinguish what exactly Lorenzo was talking about, which I outlined above. Was the contact that is alleged between Jlo/MM (only seen race once) of the SAME "type" that occured in Aragon PD/MM (of which Jlo protested)? YES OR NO?
In one hand u say u get the difference in 'type of contact'i n the other u insist contact is contact. And conclude there is hypocrisy. Then I conclude u still dint understand the differences.
Side note: did u see the crash in Moto2? That bike on the tarmac was struck and it reminded me of how easily consequence can become uber dangerous. VR (I think) mentioned cringing to miss Pedros bike at Aragon. Reminded me of Jarno Saarin. This obstacle of Pedros RCV strung in the middle of the course was not caused by two rider vying for position. It was caused by a rider error, one that can be argued was done by unmindful unnecessary risk which led to collision, regardless and irrelevant of the unusual circumstances.
In one hand u say u get the difference in 'type of contact'i n the other u insist contact is contact. And conclude there is hypocrisy. Then I conclude u still dint understand the differences.
Side note: did u see the crash in Moto2? That bike on the tarmac was struck and it reminded me of how easily consequence can become uber dangerous. VR (I think) mentioned cringing to miss Pedros bike at Aragon. Reminded me of Jarno Saarin. This obstacle of Pedros RCV strung in the middle of the course was not caused by two rider vying for position. It was caused by a rider error, one that can be argued was done by unmindful unnecessary risk which led to collision, regardless and irrelevant of the unusual circumstances.