Are we talking about the same race?
Usually not it seems.
Are we talking about the same race?
Usually not it seems.
First of all Chops said he was held up "2 seconds". Not sure how that could be calculated on the fly, but ok. Second, a rider claiming he got held up on the first lap jockey for positions is common. Falling in line then passing if you really are faster is not uncommon. Thirdly, because he claimed this cost him the race, it therefore must be true? Ok, what about the claims of other riders? Particularly about this race, are they true too? Or is just one rider allowed to claim the truth?
Welcome to the forum, you'll fit in quiet nicely.
No, i said Rossi said he was held up by over 2 seconds ! Rossi's race pace easily matched and was at times faster than the leading 2 once he got past Lorenzo, Sure lorenzo managed to hang on to rossi's shirt tails once he was past but when he was in third in the earlier part of the race the front 2 gained some distance. What does that tell you compa ? Watch the race again !
Yes, and I'm saying not sure how he could have calculated that on the fly. Lorenzo was so slow that he caught his teammate and passed him. Of course VR would have none of that, as he refused to concede the line. Is that what we call "faster" now?Kinda like Rossi was "faster" than Casey at Laguna 08? That kinda "faster"?
Well not being a racer myself i can only guess but i thought that's what pit boards were for. Plus i dare say they have timing instruments on the bike ? im only saying what i saw and quoting what i heard !
Here is what strikes me most amazing about your posts Babel. You have routinely stuck your foot in mouth and have said some outrageous things (I don't think I need to remind you) yet you've still had the bliss of sticking around as if it never happened. You see things that are not there and the things that are, you blindly ignore them. I don't know how you do it. Perhaps you really are simply just mentally challenged (that's a nice way of saying, ........).
Check out what you just did, you ask why I'm bringing up Motegi, but I was replying to you bringing it up. Are you that ........? You can just go back to last page and see. Its just a few clicks away. In fact, as if you didn't notice what you yourself had written, I call it out for you:
On top of that, you have Rossiofsky admitting he brought it up.
So let me get this straight, you bring up Motegi then accuse me of bringing it up to talk about it? In what world does this make sense? (I guess only in the world of a demented mind).
Both of you clowns are blind ..... that can't even followed what is actually being discussed in simple series. Really dude, why even try to debate me? You fail every time. Go turn on your TV and use your infamous x-ray vision to tell us something we don't know. I'm sure somebody will believe you (like Rossiofsky).
That you can ignore Simoch's action with that explanation, and not ..... about it shows your dubble standards again, untill now you had never missed any chance to show your dislike in form of bs criticises for him, so why not now? ... Do you say you have no problems with that kind of ride when it's not between team mates? then How could you ..... about Rossi's move on Gibernou and a few other's, or about Rossi's ride in that last gp which he never touched/raced Lorenzo as hard as Simoch against Aoyama.
About the Aragon thread, if your talking about me, I wasn't here (actually the whole September i was in vacation),
I'll take that as you didn't read before you opened your mouth. But hey, its not like you haven't done it before, eh.
BTW, Rossiofsky, are you happy now? Its turned into a long thread; albeit from certain members trying to deflect attention from what should have been the focus of the new champ.
I tried to help, saying it wasnt a ride for the ages was worth 5 pages
I'll take that as you didn't read before you opened your mouth. But hey, its not like you haven't done it before, eh.
I guess it depends on what floats your boat, but I would imagine most on this (fan ) forum would rate a rider's championship above a pop hit, and it is precisely because winning even one of them is such a significant achievement that winning 7 (or 9) as rossi has done is so outstanding, so again I don't understand your argument .
Since you have diverted to pop culture, I have to say I don't get your continual "slave" and "mr garrison" references, doubtless due to excessive age and lack of hipness, so there is probably a whole level of subtlety in your posts which eludes me.
Amazing isn't it? So now what? Oh I know, you will simply say, that's not you right? Maybe your older 13 year old brother broke into your account? At this point you and Babel should run with your tail between your legs to never return as you two (and I'll throw in Rob & Talpa in for good measure) are by far the most ........ members on here. Go away clowns, the adults are talking.
If there ever were evidence of the contrary this IS IT.
Yes Chopperman, I heard Rossi say he was held up fighting with Lorenzo..Rossi said he cost me the race and could have been fighting for the lead but the gap to the leaders opened up trying to overtake Lorenzo. He didn't have the tyre to make up the gap
That happen to all of them at some races, sometimes it spoils the race for a rider/s, but it is what it is, and they all suffer it sometimes. finally it didn't matter for Rossi. i remember Dovi did that to Rossi a few times, and by the time Rossi overtook him, the
gap was too big for him.
Edit:
I thought you were talking about Sepang.
Fair enough. It seems you are not crazy...
BTW, Rossiofsky, are you happy now? Its turned into a long thread; albeit from certain members trying to deflect attention from what should have been the focus of the new champ.
So you didn't bring it up?
Amazing isn't it? So now what? Oh I know, you will simply say, that's not you right? Maybe your older 13 year old brother broke into your account? At this point you and Babel should run with your tail between your legs to never return as you two (and I'll throw in Rob & Talpa in for good measure) are by far the most ........ members on here. Go away clowns, the adults are talking.
And to think, this little exchange started with you crying about how short this thread was and how "non-real fans" were not discussing here because they were at odds with the winner. Then I call you on your stupid logic and show how you didn't show for Stoner's winning thread at Aragon, and you come up with this?
This is your lame ... explanation for not showing up in the Aragon thread that Stoner won but have no problem calling out peeps because you are crying they didn't show up to this thread being that Rossi won?
Holy ...., where was your vacation? Perhaps in a cave? Even the dudes who went to the moon in 1969 could communicate with the world millions of miles away. You wouldn't happen to be a Chilean miner would you? So you are a "real fan" right, but you can't manage to post when Stoner wins but have no problem calling out others when they don't appear in this thread? Maybe all those fans you are bitching about are "vacationing" in the same place you went. I'm always ticked how you can come back and post after I've essentially back handed you for stupidity. I think I know why you return and face such embarrassment after I ..... slap your logic and posts, its because you are a mongoloid and don't realize you're a ....... ......