<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Oct 7 2009, 12:42 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I've got to disagree with you on this. Toseland managed 16 wins in seven seasons. Spies has 12 in 13 meetings, an only seeing the vast majority of these circuits this season either when he shows up on Thursday or in preseason testing. Toseland gathered those results in a far greater span of time than Spies, and he had two seasons in WSS to help him in track knowledge. As far as I'm concerned there is no comparison between the two, it just so happens that Spies has spent a year in a series that Toseland has spent the majority of his career in.
I agree with you however, to be fair, Toesland raced against Bayliss. Getting wins on that guy was like trying to get wins on Spies this season, that is to say, they are hard to come by.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Like I illustrated in an earlier post, look at what riders like Hodgson, Xaus, Byrne, Ellison and Tamada have done since they left MotoGP. Hodgson and Xaus can split a handful of race wins aboard Ducatis, Byrne has a domestic championship and has disappointed in WSBK (regrettably, I'm a big Shakey fan and hope he can come good with an Aprilia for 2010), and Tamada has fallen off the face of the planet.
Well how competitive was their ride? Xaus had a few decent showing, but now is struggling on a bike that didn't quite make a bang. Byrne is on a decent ride right now, and only gets into the top 5 at Ducati tracks like Imola and S. Africa, ad frankly, he might have been out of his league in GP. Ellison, never belonged in GP either actually. Tamada had some decent showings in WSBK and battle a few times but nothing really to write home about. So yeah I agree with you Austin.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Edwards and Bayliss are the freaks of the WSB to MotoGP phenomenon.
Edwards has become a very useful development rider and has proven he's the quickest outside the aliens on a consistent basis.
Bayliss was a casualty of the Ducati Marlboro attitude. He was never given the crew he wanted in 2003 and 2004. When he was finally given the crew he wanted in Valencia 2006, he won the thing convincingly. If Suppo wasn't so stubborn I think Bayliss would have had a very successful GP career.
That's weird, it seems the new consensus is Rossi developed alone.
Totally agree with you on Bayliss. I think we got cheated out of seeming a real MotoGP star. He was smart to say .... these politics, I'm going to a place where I can have the proper tools to win. Actually, thinking about the man that is Bayliss, he did belong in WSBK...MotoGP is much more tabloidesk and not really a good fit for Troys' no nonsense approach.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Haga is a question mark in my mind. He's always been fast on a Superbike but for whatever reason was never able to put it together in Grand Prix. He took a podium wildcarding but couldn't find that speed when he was at Red Bull Yamaha in 2001. Despite McCoy's brief success there, I'm not convinced that team was as strong as McCoy's results led everyone to believe. He was never able to recapture that form and no teammate was ever able to do much, either. Then Haga went on the Cube and had similar results to Edwards. Haga wasn't thrown out of MotoGP, he left. Was his riding style compatible with Grand Prix? I don't know, results would indicate no. My opinion is that the talent is there, you compare his season with Edwards's in 2003 and you tell me otherwise. I just think he's a pure Superbiker through and through, and unless he was able to take the fight to Rossi week in and week out, he would rather ride a Super.
Few modern day 'superbikers' have adapted to the GP. Add that the best 250 riders are given the best rides, and you have what you have described above. Great post Austi. As I read it, it almost sounded like Arrabi, and that my friend is a high compliment.