So you are saying Bagnaia let MM catch up so he could crash into him ?.Learn to analyse free data before jumping to conclusion: https://resources.motogp.com/files/results/2024/SPA/MotoGP/RAC/Analysis.pdf
What MM does after contact:
Lap 22: 1:38:3xx
Lap 23: 1:37:6xx. (3rd personal best in the race)
Lap 24: 1:37:8xx.
Lap 25: 1:37:637 (personal best).
What Pecco does after contact:
Lap 22: 1:38:2xx
Lap 23: 1:37:449 (race record)
Lap 24: 1:37:7xx.
Lap 25: 1:37:7xx.
Marquez post the personal best in the last lap, and 3rd personal best in the 3rd last lap. And you think it is a "maintaining distance" decision .
The true story: Marquez has tried everything but Bagnaia had more in the Bag.
As I previously said, credit to Bagnaia for 2 great laps, the first and the 23rd, which won him the race.
You are talking a tenth of a second in terms of the late laps, and you may not have noticed that MM caught up 2 seconds or so prior to their contact. We will never know what might have happened had he not lost ground on the first lap but as he would more genuinely say than that other guy, and did say about the tyre marks on his leathers post race, that’s racing, and he partly got shuffled back because of a genius first lap from Bagnaia.
Most on here are veterans of debates with members of the Valeban, in my case going back to the days when Hayden then Stoner were the enemies, and you are no less banal than all the others, with your tactic of making large unsupported assertions while trying to pick minor holes in the arguments of your opponents but ignoring their substantive arguments hardly a new one, nor a method of winning a debate except in your own mind, inside which you are doubtless a legend.
I would say MM is in a similar situation to your boy in 2014, grateful to be back competing towards the front of the field, after nightmare years of non-competitiveness, although in Valentino’s case after being 2 seconds a lap slower than the guy who had just vacated the 2010 Ducati and won races on that horrible bike.
The really amusing thing is that while I am sure MM wouldn’t mind another title or two he iis unlikely imo to go to his grave obsessed with a title he didn’t win as would seem likely to be the case with Rossi and his acolytes on track and those such as you off track, given the ongoing bitterness and rancour constantly on display from him and you/they 9 seasons on from 2015.
I have news for you, while MM may never win a 7th/9th title there is rather more chance of him doing so than Valentino has of winning an 8th/10th title.
It would seem highly likely that irony is a concept foreign to the Valeban, but for me the ironies are dual, firstly that Valentino never needed an 8th title to match Agostini, everyone knew he was better already, and secondly that the theft of the 2015 title is a fiction significantly the result of a fever dream which apparently involved post race analysis by that icon of the sport Uccio. Lorenzo was the guy Valentino needed to beat in those late season races, as well as Pedrosa in several races and Iannone in one.
Your version of the Gibernau curse is hardly novel either, but a reminder to those of us who followed the sport way back then that we should have realised what Rossi was about way sooner.
Last edited: