The money is Spanish and Italian (and therefore borrowed from China) and is running out.
Hang in there Andy. You,ve been doing it tough. I hadn,t realised that it was that bad.
Maintain the rage.............. against maladjusted co-inhabitants, the remaining boppers.................and well ,.............just maintain the rage...................
Go, you good thing.
I,ll have to visit you..................after i,ve found Barry in his Watagans hide-out!
The money is from 5.5B viewers and worldwide broadcasters. That it is funnelled through a British-owned, Spanish run corporation is immaterial. Dorna could fold tomorrow and a new commercial rights holder would pick up the reins and we (the great unwashed) wouldn't be aware of it.
The only indication when that happened in WSBK was a new font on the TV coverage.
Sponsors?
Repsol is not from New Zealand
Fiat is not a legendary Canadian brand
and so on and so forth.
Repsol sponsors one MotoGP team. FIAT doesn't sponsor any.
This is the list of MotoGP sponsors: http://www.motogp.com/en/sponsors
Pretty wide spread, geographically.
That was a whole lot of words, none of which sustain the statement you made which was: "[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]The money is Spanish and Italian (and therefore borrowed from China) and is running out." If you would like to address that statement and sustain it, I would be interested to see the facts, rather than the hyperbole.[/font]
[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]The only 'stance' I took was to show that the money comes from Dorna selling a package to 5.5B viewers and what the main sponsors of MotoGP are, how much money Repsol contributed to HRC and how profitable your two examples are - whether they are utilising Chinese funding or not is down to you to prove. [/font]
[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Where you got the rest of it from is bewildering.[/font]
[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]I did enjoy your twisting of words though. Keep at it, you will get it right if you persevere. Although it was never meant to be an argument, merely a pointer to the facts that were at odds with our claim.[/font]
That was a whole lot of words, none of which sustain the statement you made which was: "[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]The money is Spanish and Italian (and therefore borrowed from China) and is running out." If you would like to address that statement and sustain it, I would be interested to see the facts, rather than the hyperbole.[/font]
[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]The only 'stance' I took was to show that the money comes from Dorna selling a package to 5.5B viewers and what the main sponsors of MotoGP are, how much money Repsol contributed to HRC and how profitable your two examples are - whether they are utilising Chinese funding or not is down to you to prove. [/font]
[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Where you got the rest of it from is bewildering.[/font]
[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]I did enjoy your twisting of words though. Keep at it, you will get it right if you persevere. Although it was never meant to be an argument, merely a pointer to the facts that were at odds with our claim.[/font]
I can see merit on both sides of the argument, I think the state of the Spanish and Italian economies is a problem for the sport, given the number of races and viewership there, and the chinese could conceivably stop lending money to them , although I haven't heard that dorna's british parent company bridgepoint is in any trouble. Ezy does seem to still be trying to get asian races run to european time though which suggests this is still where the money is, and I think a big italian TV company recently went for wsbk rights rather than motogp which had previously been their choice. I don't really know what the ratings are in general, and valentino rossi not being physically immortal has always been something which would eventually have to be dealt with.
Where I am doubtful about is ezy's belief in the "success" of his moto2 and moto3 formulae. Sure they produce close racing, but don't seem to generate much discussion or interest even among die hard bike racing enthusiasts such as we on this site and the other fan forums. I personally find wss which generally has rather close racing as well more authentic, and can generate little emotional investment in who wins moto2. I do wonder whether how much such interest as there is in moto2 and moto3 relates to the top riders of these series being the prospective future stars of the premier class, which a putative "moto 1" class may not remain.
Full grids,close racing,sponsers, moto2 breaking 500cc lap times a better platform to moto gp the list goes on,just because its not being talked about dosnt mean its not a success in fact it not being moaned about answers your question.
Why?A good measure is the general forum commentary where generally far more comments appear regarding MotoGP than will appear about MGP2/3 and that should be worrying where these are the 'future of the sport' as is often claimed
Why?
I've been a fan of NHL hockey since I could walk. Does that mean I have to be a fan of AHL/CHL/OHL hockey? I have a passable knowledge of minor league hockey as it relates to the next phenom and will watch minor league playoffs but a true fan, not so much.
Same with 125/250 Moto3/2... passable knowledge.
Minor leagues are minor leagues for a reason.
Full grids,close racing,sponsers, moto2 breaking 500cc lap times a better platform to moto gp the list goes on,just because its not being talked about dosnt mean its not a success in fact it not being moaned about answers your question.