Sure, I would back Gigi to have not made a major design error. Having young chargers like Bagnaia and Martin while good in many ways may be unhelpful with the sort of issue they seem to have, they may be too inexperienced to pinpoint problems.Sure - in regards to those points, I have no disagreement with either of you.
I do think tho that the complaint about too many changes is not entirely valid. Too many changes are only too many if they don't end up having positive effect. Set-backs happen. That's just part and parcel of the dynamic of prototype racing. With testing limited for reasons of economics, no factory can be expected to come to the the first race of the season dramatically improved AND fully realized.
And yes, much as I have admired Dovi, by the time the bike was really at peak development, he was sadly past his prime. But damn, he gave it everything and came bloody close that one year.
It is possible Ducati have less advantage on the straight because Suzuki and Honda have progressed as well. I dozed during the race, did Bastianini have a straight line advantage on the old bike ?. Iirc Ducati might have had an advantage early on when the control ECU came in, all manufacturers have probably had sufficient experience with that by now. I believe the 2022 Honda is the first to be designed around the control ECU .
I am not someone who requires close racing ahead of everything else , if a rider is truly markedly better I am happy to watch that as well, but looks like close racing is what will transpire. I am not severely disappointed by MM, he had quite good pace on a limited preparation on what is not his best track, and Pol’s pace suggests the bike has good potential, and I can still see MM being quite strong once he gets into his stride.