You're the best editor I've ever had.
Just wait for the bill......................
You're the best editor I've ever had.
I haven't been able to confirm that Stoner did accompany Marco back to Italy. I have seen other articles, tweets and videos but no mention of Stoner. If anyone has any further confirmation of this (apart from the GP One article), please post it.
Thanks baz.
Bikergirl said on the other thread dovi had gone to the family's house with valentino, so perhaps many of them went for the funeral and stoner was among those on the plane and was mentioned in the gpone report because he is the world champion.
I was also wondering if they had Adriana accompany Kate, to some extent .......
Bunyip I understood your post.
I too have noticed the rewriting of history.
I have also been sickened by the over doing of the RIP stuff. But then I almost daily think of the 100,000's of people that have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan needlessly by the axis of terror that is the OZ, US and UK governments yet not a single one of those people get even a shred of sympathy. I worry about our solders who are committing crimes against humanity daily and what it does to their psyche.
I was of course saddened by the death of Sic but my grief ended within 24 hrs as my thoughts reflected back to all the people that die every day for just living in a place that has something we want and never get to live their dreams. Sic got to live his dream before he died and that makes me smile.
Bunyip I understood your post.
I too have noticed the rewriting of history.
I have also been sickened by the over doing of the RIP stuff. But then I almost daily think of the 100,000's of people that have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan needlessly by the axis of terror that is the OZ, US and UK governments yet not a single one of those people get even a shred of sympathy. I worry about our solders who are committing crimes against humanity daily and what it does to their psyche.
I was of course saddened by the death of Sic but my grief ended within 24 hrs as my thoughts reflected back to all the people that die every day for just living in a place that has something we want and never get to live their dreams. Sic got to live his dream before he died and that makes me smile.
I see your point Mental but its far easy to mourn someone you feel you know and like than it is to mourn a faceless soldier fighting a war thats illegal. The mourning for the soldiers and victims of these wars for me is overshadowed by the selfish ....... governments that caused the war(s) in the first place, i dont feel sorrow, i feel anger.
OMG. I tought you guys were busy training in the Taliban camps or at least throwing stones at police in wall street?
I feel anger too.
I feel sorry for people with their head in the sand who still believe that our 'democratic' society and its capitalism crutch is a success. I can understand the reason for keeping your head in the sand because understanding it's complete failure is confronting. It is just like MotoGP in that as the failure becomes more and more noticeable we keep throwing more and more rules at it as if we believe that doing more and more of the same will somehow generate a different result.
Talpa's post was genuine and was not point scoring, and I say as a regular combatant of his that I appreciated the honesty and candour in the comment that seems to have so irked.
Gaz
Race fans deny their inner ghoul
[]by:Jill Singer
Caption of image: Was Simoncelli's death really unpreventable?
HOW is it that so many motorsports fans seem shocked when drivers and riders are killed on the racetrack?
What do they really expect from high-speed, close-proximity racing? And why do they think that both participants as well as spectators at some events sign waiver forms acknowledging the risk to their lives?
Whether it was the premature and gruesome deaths of Marco Simoncelli, Dan Wheldon, Daijiro Kato, Shoya Tomizawa, Roland Ratzenberger or Ayrton Senna, public reaction to this legitimised form of road carnage follows a trajectory that smacks of denial.
It's as though supporters can't face up to their complicity in how these young men came to die. They try to rationalise their dangerous thrill-seeking by saying the men died doing what they loved - and in the next breath they talk of "tragedy" and their disbelief when someone dies.
Simoncelli's fellow Honda rider, Dani Pedrosa, commented: "There are things that shouldn't happen, but this is sport".
Sport? Soon after Simoncelli's death the MotoGP safety officer claimed it was "unpreventable". Really? If deaths on the track are inevitable, how can we call it "sport"? Valentino Rossi is one rider who seems particularly conflicted about this.
After Tomizawa's death last year, Rossi said: "The rest means nothing when this happens". The rest presumably being the thrills, the adulation, the money. And now he's also lost his mate Simoncelli. If meaning hasn't been stripped from Rossi's career choice by now, it is hard to imagine what more it would take to make that happen.
Clearly, there are riders who themselves question the validity of their "sport". As MotoGP rider Andrea Dovizioso said last year: "You forget sometimes how easily something like this (death) can happen. Sometimes our sport is just too dangerous."
Dare to question the ethics of motorsports, though, and you risk being run over. Bemused by the flood of platitudes about Simoncelli's death - such as "five minutes of speed is equivalent to another person's lifetime" - I (foolishly) tweeted my doubts about the genuineness of this outpouring of grief and suggested the sport thrives on crashes.
To be sure, my sentiments could have been expressed more sensitively, but in the angry barrage of abuse that followed, it surprised me that no one could admit they actually enjoy the inherent dangers of track racing. To do so would obviously expose the inner ghoul of spectators. Time and again I was told that people don't watch for the crashes.
But it's not just squeamish women such as me (and I have seen more than enough road trauma in my life) who suspect that some people are getting off on the carnage.
Tim Dahlberg is an Associated Press sports writer who confirmed my worst suspicions: "Racing is a dangerous, dangerous sport. Always has been, which is a major part of its appeal.
"People come to watch racers risk their lives and flirt with danger. They slap high fives for a good wreck, strain to see replays of cars slamming into walls. Without crashes, racing would just be cars going around an oval in a chess match. Interesting, perhaps, but not thrilling enough to get people to watch."
So for those who now grieve for Simoncelli, ask yourselves: Isn't there perhaps just a speck of blood on your hands?
As this is the "fallout" thread, I thought I'd post this article here. And while I'm at it, I'd like to say, people have many takes, opinions, and ways of coping, given the recent death of Sic, most have been measured which has been relieving to me. I think this thread shows that there are various aspects to be explored about the incident itself, ourselves, the ways of a forum, and the community at large. Here is an article from the outer stretches of this spectra. Btw, my first reaction was to lambast this person, but then I took a few more reflective moments in thought, and found myself exploring some of the thoughts expressed while others were filed under other areas. I hope we all take the measured approach.
http://www.heraldsun...d9892ad67fa3908