As this is the "fallout" thread, I thought I'd post this article here. And while I'm at it, I'd like to say, people have many takes, opinions, and ways of coping, given the recent death of Sic, most have been measured which has been relieving to me. I think this thread shows that there are various aspects to be explored about the incident itself, ourselves, the ways of a forum, and the community at large. Here is an article from the outer stretches of this spectra. Btw, my first reaction was to lambast this person, but then I took a few more reflective moments in thought, and found myself exploring some of the thoughts expressed while others were filed under other areas. I hope we all take the measured approach.
http://www.heraldsun...d9892ad67fa3908
That article was intellectually lazy.
Lazy in general, if you ask me. At one point she asked why participants and fans believe they've signed away their lives to a waiver. No joke, she legitimately asks that question as if it's valid. Firstly, each and every rider is more than aware of the inherent risks of the sport and as Colin Edwards said some seven years ago: "We know it's not all flowers and roses, it's a risk you take. It's a calculated risk. And when you do the calculations, the odds are in your favor." Secondly, I'm quite certain that each and every ticket to each and every event is a waiver of any responsibility held by the track in the event of an accident and harm done to any spectator. So yes, each and every person involved and attending a race, is well aware of the risk involved, if not consciously, then surely legally.
She seems in disbelief to the concept that people can die in sport. So all of motorsport is only sport by a technicality or not a sport at all in her view? How about freeclimbing? Is that also not a sport? How about sports in which paralysis is as common as death in motorsport? Say American football. Is that not a sport because of the inherent risk?
The biggest injustice of this article is her misunderstanding of the role inherent risk plays in the passion for motorsport in participants and in fans. Sure, you're going to get those casual observers who revel in the crashes. But I'd hardly consider them fans of the sport, certainly doing nothing to propel the sport forward. But in every participant and in every real supporter of the sport, we understand just how dangerous it is. And for us, the crashes are the last thing we want to see because of that danger. Because every time you fall down, there's a risk. But that's just it. The risk. It's what separates them from mere mortals. We don't love the sport because of the crashes, we love the sport because these men can do incredible things on machines that we couldn't dream of doing. A lot of that is natural talent and a good portion of that is pure bravery. And those traits are something I admire. I hate to us an F1 example here, but when Lewis Hamilton dove up the inside of Fernando Alonso (?) at the old turn one of Silverstone this past summer on slick tires in wet conditions, I couldn't believe my eyes. I am a big detractor of Hamilton, but that moment blew my mind because of his bravery to attempt such a maneuver and his talent to pull it off. That's why the loss of Simoncelli has been so hard felt across the sport. Because he showcased those two traits every weekend.
And to claim the chess match that is motorsport is too dull to watch is a slap in the face. I won't make sweeping generalizations, but I, particularly, love watching a rider stalk his opponent for two to three laps. Learning where he is stronger than his opponent, finding out where the strengths and weaknesses line up to attempt a pass, and knowing when the moment is right to go. To contemplate all of that while piloting a motorcycle at 200mph or lent over and experiencing Gs makes it boggle my mind how they can do it all at once.
And finally, none of us, not fans, not organizers, not promoters, not participants, have blood on our hands. When I used to ride, a little over my head, admittedly, I knew the risk I was taking. But I loved to ride so I did it anyway. When I used to ice race, I knew that if I fell off it was going to hurt like hell if I got run over by the studs of my competitors, but I did it anyway. I didn't do either because I thought I was going to be famous or rich some day for it. I did it because I loved it. And that's the same reason Marco did it. Otherwise he wouldn't have sacrificed his childhood to do so, or spent 100 days a year on the road, or just re-signed a contract with Honda so he could do it all again in 2013.
The fact of the matter is this is an oversimplification of sport that someone doesn't understand. If you don't agree with it, fine, that's your business, but don't tell me that it's my and my passion's fault someone has died. Someone who you don't know and don't care about, someone who I and my passion care about deeply.
Get ......, Jill Singer.