- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 1,793
- Location
- A caravan on an island
From Yamaha's perspective, there are really only two pertinent questions with respect to Rossi's tyre -
1. Which tyre is Rossi faster on? Not faster vis a vis Lorenzo or Marquez. Just faster in general. Given the M1's characteristics, that's the 2015 edge-treated Bridgestone-type. Better grip, better corner speed, better results. Good for Yamaha.
2. If its Rossi's destiny to finish a perpetual second, which rider would they prefer he do so behind? If someone has to win, better a Yamaha than a Honda. And if it enables Tech 3 to fight for the top independent honours, better still.
And either way, they do appear to have done their best to retain Lorenzo for 2017-18 seasons.
Rossi's problem was an unusually high number of DNFs enabling Marquez to subsequently run relatively low-risk races while managing the points gap.
He was dominant at Argentina, Austin, Aragon, Japan & Australia but in most other races Rossi had a comparable or better pace. Its quite possible that if not for the Mugello blowup (a software rather than tyre issue), Marquez would have wrapped up his title only at Valencia (might even have had to fight for it, depending on his luck).
Point isn't that Marquez's victory is undeserved. Its not, he's ridden an outstanding season. Its that Rossi's performances have earned him his place in the team, on merit alone. Its different from say.. the 2014 season, where he finished ahead of Lorenzo & Pedrosa but they were really only fighting over scraps.
Also, while Marquez will be the obvious favourite to take the 2017 title (much like Lorenzo was this year, until Catalunya), I wouldn't write off Rossi altogether. Or even Vinales.
In the seven seasons that Rossi and Lorenzo have been on the same team Rossi has merited his place by finishing ahead 4-3 in championship results.