Joined Aug 2008
124 Posts | 0+
He did win one more race than valentino this year though.
And was in contention for several more. And you have to ask the question - if you can't win the championship, what's more valuable/desirable, a high championship position, or race wins?
Anyone who thinks that rossi won't be right in the thick of it next year has obviously not observed bike racing for the last 15 odd years at all closely.
I've observed fairly closely, but I'm not at all sure that Rossi will be in the thick of it next year. I know his record. I'm not writing him off. But if history has taught us anything, it's that all good things must come to an end. The king is dead, long live the king. And much more recent history tells us that the Ducati is unique.
However whilst you might see jB's comment about fixing the ducati in 80 seconds to be justifiable confidence, and as an admirer of jb going back to the wayne gardner days I might even agree with you, I can see some case for it to be considered arrogant, and that an implication could be drawn regarding not just stoner but the competence of the entire ducati operation including presiozi.
I feel a little queasy saying this, but I read a post on crash.net saying that Burgess had taken several back-handed swipes at Stoner in recent times, and I'm forced to agree. I'm sometimes overly patriotic, yet I try to look at these things in as objective a light as possible....but the way he's been carrying on has been...gulp unaustralian.
I personally think that major chassis re-design, and perhaps even an entirely different chassis design philosophy, may be required to make the ducati into a valentino-style bike, which is why i favour him more for 2012 rather than 2011. However I also think that valentino can adapt his riding to the bike if needed, although riding it in the way required to make it fast may involve dnfs even for him.
I too favour him more for 2012. Much more. But I'm not nearly as confident as you are that he can adapt to the GP11.