You're right. At least, partially right. It seems my memory slightly failed me. But you're also partially wrong, too. Here's a snippet from Krop's write-up after day two:
"While the man who had left Ducati to ride for Honda was scorching around on day one, then setting the fastest time on day two, Valentino Rossi, who had taken Casey Stoner's place in Ducati, was wobbling around at the rear."
C'mon. That's a figure of speech referring to the classification -- not a comment on the behavior of the bike (btw, to see if it was wobbling or not, if you have eyes, just check the vids).
Can it be that the rider's style, motives, talents have something to do with that?
I rather compare the times of Rossi with his first test on a Yamaha.
http://www.motorsm.com/motorsport/moto/gp/2004_testing_Feb.asp
and this:
http://www.motorsm.com/motorsport/moto/gp/2004_testing.asp
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
at his first test Rossi was 0.6s slower than Biaggi.
While Biaggi and all Honda's and Kawasaki's tested in the first 2 days, and Yamaha's tested in the 3th and 4th days alone.
JAN, 2004, SEPANG, MALAYSIA:
BIAGGI QUICKEST 2m 2.585s (his time of the second day)
Rossi's fastest came also at the second day: Rossi, Yamaha, 2m 3.17s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
then in the next test, they were riding together at the same day.
Day 1
FEB 11, 2004, SEPANG, MALAYSIA
1 Biaggi , Honda, 2m 2.693s
2 Edwards , Honda, 2m 2.939
3 Rossi , Yamaha
4 Gibernau , Honda,
5 Capirossi , Ducati,
6 Hayden , Honda,
7 Tamada , Honda, 8 Bayliss , Ducati, 9 Roberts , Suzuki, 10 Checa , Yamaha
----
Day 2
FEB 12, 2004
1 Biaggi , Honda 2m 2.70s
2 Edwards , Honda 2m 2.845
3 Hayden , Honda 2m 2.855
4 Gibernau , Honda
5 Rossi , Yamaha
6 Checa , Yamaha
--------
Day 3
FEB 13, 2004
1 Hayden , Honda, 2m 1.94s quicker than 2003 pole
2 Biaggi , Honda
3 Gibernau , Honda
4 Edwards , Honda
5 Rossi , Yamaha
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you look at the other test results in that link, you will see that Rossi wasn't the fastest, untill the final test.
So we May see again that he little by little improves himself. His times aren't good now, but no reason for any panic, i will wait and see after a few gp's.
Stoner was just riding fast because he wanted to get the test over with and finally eat his whole sack of halloween candy
What jumps out when i see this list, is the names that are NOT on it. There is no Stoner, Lorenzo, or Pedrosa. This time around will be much tougher than 2004
And I still maintain that Burgess stuck his foot in his mouth when he alleged that he could fix some Ducati problem in 80 seconds.
He has the potencial but he is not mentaly strong enough... imo.
I am no technical expert on the bikes and to be honest a mere spectator of the sport..and am just wondering if Rossi actually meant to ask for some "feel/feedback/intelligence" from the bike's control system to push harder, than the total lack of feel at the moment that causes him to exert only a meagre fraction of his effort/talent, unexplored bike potential and thus poor lap times. I do not think he needs any drastic changes in the physics/dynamics of the machine. If so, I'd consider this the toughest component at hand for the engineers, mechanics and electronic settings alike. I could be wrong in my guess here, but if Rossi is asking for only more intelligence besides retaining all the strengths of the Ducati, sorting the whole thing out appears be quite herculean a task to achieve in just a few months than Yamaha-izing the bike by providing better handling/flexibility. I wish he and the team succeeds against the odds, but it is very hard to judge what fixes he really has asked for unless we compared them to Melandri's and Hayden's first ever feedback on the so-called brutal machine. Had the Melandri-Ducati relationship not turned into the nightmare that the paddock dreads of, we'd not be too worried about this test's results really. We need to compare Melandri's feedback with Rossi's. From what I've read of Rossi's style of development, he thinks deep and does not fall prey to any shallow tinkering or trial-and-error methods of immediate fixes.
Also, I think the Ducati is an engineer's dream and a "raw" rider's paradise. It could just be needing some Yamaha-izing in ideology to suit Rossi's mental framework of being both a racer and engineer. Rossi is no match to the raw riding skills that Stoner and Randy Puniet exhibit and in retrospect signing him on may not have been the best idea for Ducati and Rossi alike. I however assume that they have thought this through to every nitty picky detail over the past few years and have a plan in place to make the relationship successful. Personally though, I find a racer honing his engineering skills more suited to the sport in general, and albeit Stoner/RdP being hugely talented may not bag the best results for the long term.. qualifying glory and a few pulverizing race wins is the best the latter can achieve all subservient to the machine.
You're right. At least, partially right. It seems my memory slightly failed me. But you're also partially wrong, too. Here's a snippet from Krop's write-up after day two:
the same .... was being sprouted this time last year about Stoner, and myself and others were being riducled for backing Jorge to be the stronger challenger, interestingly enough from the same clowns who are now saying Jorge is the best of all time.
Nice post as I like it when someone submits a post which have clearly required some brain power however I do not necessarily agree with it on 2 points.
1. The electronics if he was using Stoners settings are probably the least invasive of any bike on the grid. Stoners comments on the settings on the Honda confirm this as he spent a lot of time winding them back so he could get a connection between the throttle and the rear wheel. The electronics on the Ducati may not have been set how Rossi likes them but I don't think feel would have been too much of a problem.
2. From all reports it is the physics and the characteristics of the Ducati that are the problem. For the past 12mths the front end of the bike has been wrong. A fact highlighted by the large number of front end losses that all Ducati riders have faced. This is also the feedback from Rossi.
What jumps out when i see this list, is the names that are NOT on it. There is no Stoner, Lorenzo, or Pedrosa. This time around will be much tougher than 2004
Your memory is tainted with wet dreams of Stoner, therefore hindering all possible function. This is why when morons like yourself detract from the greatest chief mechanic of all time, and can't even research the quote for accuracy, it's a source of great amusement
the only thing we know at present is that no one knows anything, Yamahas gag order prevented this. Though all of these priceless posts will be great ammunition when reality sets in next year, just as the same .... was being sprouted this time last year about Stoner, and myself and others were being riducled for backing Jorge to be the stronger challenger, interestingly enough from the same clowns who are now saying Jorge is the best of all time.
What is interesting to consider is Randy De Puniet. I haven't really seen his performance mentioned. He has had to make a similar move to Rossi, yet was quite a bit faster, 8th fastest overall I think. Maybe he has adapted the Ducati more quickly? I know he may well have less to lose because he isn't going under the knife in the next couple of weeks, but I still think it should be mentioned.