- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Messages
- 11,378
- Location
- Pomona NY
Yes, I already had this conversation about justification, he can give whatever reason, its his life, that's what I said. But not all reasons given will be judged the same, and frankly, that's what will be debated (rightly or wrongly). Just like the legacy threads. Nobody likes a quitter, as I've said before. Its a fine line between quitting and retiring, the reasons for doing so go a long way in making that distinction (rightly or wrongly). I fully suspect most of the debate to be along tribal lines. Its a fair discussion, and I'm not going to pretend its off limits simply because I think Stoner is a great talented rider. After all, its what we do around here, debate meaningless .....
Walking away from something that no longer gives one pleasure doesn't make one a quitter.
If it were in Stoner's powers to change the way Dorna run the sport - possibly I think it would
be applicable to call him a quitter. I don't have a problem with a guy who has a high standard
for what he considers the pinnacle of Grand Prix racing. I'd hazard to guess that Stoner is
sick of the politics too. It's established that he's very private as well. Doubtless he won't
miss the requirements to to PR work. I don't see that having a goal and attaining it and moving
on makes a person a quitter. Some here seem to think there's a kind of moral imperative
for a racer to go down fighting, down to the bitter end as it were. Clearly that isn't Stoner's
goal. It amazes me how intolerant people can be when someone has a different philosophy
or a divergent set of values.