Do you seriously want me to make a judgement on that?
Is that the only advice the riders have?
Would you issue that to the riders (or their representative/adviser) and expect them to go based on that alone?
Anyway its all early stages yet ......... I'm still half of the mind that the "no go" threat could possibly be a way of ensuring everything possible will be done so that if they do go, they will be safe.
i don't know why you bother participating in the forum barry, since you are always correct on any subject, and apparently anything stoner does or decides is also correct, so there would appear to be little point in you entering into discussion with anyone.
I don't know what advice stoner et al have taken, if any, it is fairly easy to get advice that suits your predetermined view as tony abbott frequently demonstrates. If they have advice that allows them to make an irrevocable decision I would be interested to hear it since I haven't heard it including at an international scientific meeting 6 weeks ago (either formally or informally) and I am involved in this area professionally at least as much as you purportedly are in engineering etc, although someone posted today on another forum that the british government has advised not travelling to within 200km of fukushima. Again I would like to see the basis of this, but if stoner et al knew this was pending, I would accept this as them basing their decision on at least some independent advice, erroneous or not.