This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

MotoGP media

I am known to embarrass myself posting at 2:00 am as I said, as well as at other times. Despite or perhaps because of having some background in psychology long ago I am not a great believer in psychology as a discipline in general but do think the 2 guys concerned produced something of genius and was made aware of it as an actual work of scholarship by my brother years ago who is more towards that aspect of things. We do have an academic physical scientist in the family who is not doing too badly as it happens.

No worries, Mike.
I came across it during a stupid ....... management workshop I got sent to years ago. So that definitely tainted my view of it from the start, plus as a concept it's hardly new. But at least DK put some data behind it.
As for Nobels, my sister works in the same field as the latest Australian winner for Medicine. Reckons he probably would have been recognised earlier if he wasn't such an abrasive prick.
 
What are you on about, Jum?

Mike claimed D and K got a Nobel.
I disputed this.
Mike corrected this to an igNobel and stated they deserve a real one.
I pointed out that there's no Nobel for Psychology.
You got all butthurt on Mm's behalf and went off on a frothy rant and are now pulling the defence tactic of those with no counterpoint: making Gotcha accusations.
IgNobel 2004

Category: Psychology – Presented jointly to Daniel Simons of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Christopher Chabris of Harvard University, for demonstrating that when people pay close attention to something, it's all too easy to overlook anything else.

Example: hastily rushing to correct someone on a technicality wilst overlooking the obvious parody resulting in egg in your face.

Reckons he probably would have been recognised earlier if he wasn't such an abrasive prick.

Like say smugly telling people to stop embarrassing themselves, then trying to walk it back after realizing their own folly? You didn't stop to consider the context in which Mike told 'ME' the research had garnered a Nobi. Dr.No, are their any Onion News reports you'd like to alert me to? So I can then say, hey stupid, that's not real news, stop embarrassing yourself.
 
Last edited:
To Duc The Overlord:

Please replace Captcha verification with Gotcha verification.

Also please implement IQ, general knowledge, language and debating skills tests for all members and post results.

This way we can ensure fair competition amongst verbal combatants via a handicap system.

Seems the playing field here is often as tilted as in our beloved MGP.

;)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
IgNobel 2004

Category: Psychology – Presented jointly to Daniel Simons of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Christopher Chabris of Harvard University, for demonstrating that when people pay close attention to something, it's all too easy to overlook anything else.

Example: hastily rushing to correct someone on a technicality wilst overlooking the obvious parody resulting in egg in your face.



Like say smugly telling people to stop embarrassing themselves, then trying to walk it back after realizing their own folly? You didn't stop to consider the context in which Mike told 'ME' the research had garnered a Nobi. Dr.No, are their any Onion News reports you'd like to alert me to? So I can then say, hey stupid, that's not real news, stop embarrassing yourself.

I'm walking nothing back. Unless engaging Mm in reasonable discourse after he posted a civil reply is walking it back?
You were barking up the wrong tree and now are on a lovely attacking spree. Enjoy.
 
Ha! Mick, that was pretty good. An igNobel for irony and humor perhaps. (If there was such a category). Thnx for the levity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I'm walking nothing back. Unless engaging Mm in reasonable discourse after he posted a civil reply is walking it back?
You were barking up the wrong tree and now are on a lovely attacking spree. Enjoy.

Oh, "reasonable discourse" eh? Are we back in our circle of trust? Where you are "honestly" engaging in benign non-judgemental discourse?


Errr...there's a Nobel for psychology now?

STOP EMBARRASSING YOURSELF.

Or maybe cover the original "Nobel" post in lemon juice?

Doc, you are fascinating. Do you realize the .... you type in a post can be read?

You suggested Mike was embarrassing himself, when in fact the point of his post buzzed over your brain. Which btw was a reply to me. You added he cover his 'mistaken post' with lemon juice, a reference to McArthur Wheeler's stupidity. Who the hell do you think you're fooling when you are being smug? Smug wilst overlooking your folly. You gonna throw darts then wonder why you're getting them thrown back? If you live in a glass house don't throw rocks.
 
Last edited:
Oh, "reasonable discourse" eh? Are we back in our circle of trust? Where you are "honestly" engaging in benign non-judgemental discourse?




Doc, you are fascinating. Do you realize the .... you type in a post can be read?

You suggested Mike was embarrassing himself, when in fact the point of his post buzzed over your brain. You added he cover his 'mistaken post' with lemon juice, a reference to McArthur Wheeler's stupidity. Who the hell do you think you're fooling when you are being a smug? Your gonna throw darts then wonder why you're getting them thrown back? If you live in a glass house don't throw rocks.

Yes. I had a shot at Mm. And then he was admirably civil, so I responded in kind. How terrible of me.
You however, got it all wrong in your initial attacks on me and are now changing tack. And going for a bit of character assassination
Unlike you, I eventually tire of these sparring matches, so I'm leaving it there. Kisses.
 
No worries, Mike.
I came across it during a stupid ....... management workshop I got sent to years ago. So that definitely tainted my view of it from the start, plus as a concept it's hardly new. But at least DK put some data behind it.
As for Nobels, my sister works in the same field as the latest Australian winner for Medicine. Reckons he probably would have been recognised earlier if he wasn't such an abrasive prick.

I know people who were in Gus Nossal's year in medicine though who said he was a terrific bloke who still turned up to their 50 year reunions or whatever.

I actually don't need Cliche to humble me whether or not I am the one between us solely in need of humility; I can just look to family members for that such as a niece with first author papers in both Science and Nature before she turned 27, making my talent for performing in examinations several decades ago fairly insignificant.

I do have a fairly strong belief that management theory is largely nonsense which it would seem you share.
 
Yes. I had a shot at Mm. And then he was admirably civil, so I responded in kind. How terrible of me.
You however, got it all wrong in your initial attacks on me and are now changing tack. And going for a bit of character assassination
Unlike you, I eventually tire of these sparring matches, so I'm leaving it there. Kisses.

How many posts did it take for you to admit you took a shot? Don't go all chickenshit now Doc, if you're going to take the types of shots you're known for then stand up and accept what you predictably have coming.

Let me get this straight, you completely missed the parody of the igNobel prize then went all attack mode (which you admit to finally) now you're going all ..... mode because I responded to you butting into a reply that didn't have .... to do with you? Let me help you understand how interaction generally works around here, butt into a conversation wilst taking a dig, expect one in return. Its a predictable dynamic.

Perhaps we are being 'petty', eh? Xoxo
 
Last edited:
I know people who were in Gus Nossal's year in medicine though who said he was a terrific bloke who still turned up to their 50 year reunions or whatever.

I actually don't need Cliche to humble me whether or not I am the one between us solely in need of humility; I can just look to family members for that such as a niece with first author papers in both Science and Nature before she turned 27, making my talent for performing in examinations several decades ago fairly insignificant.

I do have a fairly strong belief that management theory is largely nonsense which it would seem you share.

I was lucky enough to have met Nossal at a Melb Uni event that I went to with my aforementioned sister. An Australian treasure.
 
Your deluded mate.

No competition between manufacturers means no tv show.

Deluded? So because it would radically change the sport I'm not allowed to state a preference/wish?
People might enjoy different aspects of the spectacle. For me the nature of the bikes don't do a whole lot to improve the show.
Ask the people at the track and in front of the tv. Are there 10% that couldn't care less about the bikes? Tell you what,i guarantee you there is a healthy 30% solely concernedwith the rider (s).

Too bad thats still a minority but the way motorcycle demographic edges ever closer to casa tranquila it will become more of a niche sport. And in that imo inevitable scenario there needs to be a bigger emphasis on sport and entertainment and less on how the bmw s1000rr is the best bike right now because of gp.
 
I know people who were in Gus Nossal's year in medicine though who said he was a terrific bloke who still turned up to their 50 year reunions or whatever.

I actually don't need Cliche to humble me whether or not I am the one between us solely in need of humility; I can just look to family members for that such as a niece with first author papers in both Science and Nature before she turned 27, making my talent for performing in examinations several decades ago fairly insignificant.

I do have a fairly strong belief that management theory is largely nonsense which it would seem you share.

Thats cool mikey, thats the closest you've come to admitting being at fault without being nasty in the same sentence. Thx for the levity my man. What you're doing is cute and honestly reminds me of my 12th graders . heard a concept, try to mention it as often as possible (intellectual badge of honor) and somehow twist it so it applies. Is it a bit funny?yeah. But i do see your potential and i most definitely am honored to have you as my disciple/part time pleasure monkey. I kinda wanna brush you.

Nice to see someone with a brain not just stand idly by, props from prop,kudos from *** doc.

Gotta warn you tho doc. You're wasting your time. Its the same constant impaired social interaction and repetitive behavior you'll encounter with the king of ........ Save your breath
 
Thats cool mikey, thats the closest you've come to admitting being at fault without being nasty in the same sentence. Thx for the levity my man. What you're doing is cute and honestly reminds me of my 12th graders . heard a concept, try to mention it as often as possible (intellectual badge of honor) and somehow twist it so it applies. Is it a bit funny?yeah. But i do see your potential and i most definitely am honored to have you as my disciple/part time pleasure monkey. I kinda wanna brush you.

Nice to see someone with a brain not just stand idly by, props from prop,kudos from *** doc.

Gotta warn you tho doc. You're wasting your time. Its the same constant impaired social interaction and repetitive behavior you'll encounter with the king of ........ Save your breath
Whatever my manifold deficiencies, attempting to practice cod psychology by internet is not among them, and I actually am sufficiently informed/educated to have a position on that.

If you are a teacher that is an admirable profession, two of my admired siblings are teachers, English teachers as it happens.
 
Last edited:
Glad you admire my job mon frere. I like the doctors too if they're not from tavullia.
I'm kinda puzzeled why you always say one thing and do the other. Or why every single one of your posts gets edited. But enough of that.
Glad you're finally back to being amicable with me ma cherie.
 
Glad you admire my job mon frere. I like the doctors too if they're not from tavullia.
I'm kinda puzzeled why you always say one thing and do the other. Or why every single one of your posts gets edited. But enough of that.
Glad you're finally back to being amicable with me ma cherie.
Because I am obssessive about grammar and syntax, to a large extent making my living from writing, and prone to error in those things at 3:00 am in the morning. I don't change anything material, particularly if I have been replied to.

This whole thing is an example of why I have, wisely it would seem, previously refrained from engaging in flame wars, because I would get no satisfaction from humiliating you even if I was capable of doing so, a capability I am not claiming btw.

Despite your posts mostly containing personal insults, I have directed very few at you, and in my conceit and arrogance have been amused to watch you run both sides of the argument. Telling you I was old and fat after you offered a truce was an obviously failed attempt at self-deprecation, but you chose to omit that part and sig "I am large and strong", it would seem as an example of my arrogance.

I would be happy however to go back and repeat my support for someone whom I regard as a friend (I think he might also be an English teacher btw) against him being called a whoremonger, and ironically Mdub's and JK's main beef against Keshav is exactly what you accuse me of doing to you, ie that he constantly condescends to them, although I have not as yet followed you to an entirely separate forum to continue doing so.

My politics as it happens are both similar to what they were when I was 25, and it would seem similar to yours, and it was his racism that made me particularly abhor the most recent previous conservative (EDIT Australian) prime minister, who was quite the young fascist even when he was 19 when we were contemporaries at university those several decades ago. In regard to punk you seemed to be implying that the punk musicians had sold out, although I am reluctant to draw any implications given the web you have spun from implications, mostly not intended by me, that you have drawn from my posts. I think for many of the bands it was mainly showbiz, and I have no problem with those who continue to perform 40 years later because they enjoy it. I was obviously on board with the anti-Thatcherism of course, and I don't think guys who did have genuine political convictions like John Lydon and Joe Strummer ever renounced them.
 
Last edited:
2In regard to punk you seemed to be implying that the punk musicians had sold out, although I am reluctant to draw any implications given the web you have spun from implications mostly not intended by me you have drawn from my posts. I think for most of them it was mainly showbiz, and I have no problem with those who continue to perform 40 years later because they enjoy it. I was obviously on board with the anti-Thatcherism of course, and I don't think guys who did have genuine political convictions like John Lydon and Joe Strummer ever renounced them.

Conveniently this discussion is in the news ATM...

Malcolm McLaren's son to burn £5m of punk memorabilia | Music | The Guardian
 
Because I am obssessive about grammar and syntax, to a large extent making my living from writing, and prone to error in those things at 3:00 am in the morning. I don't change anything material, particularly if I have been replied to.

This whole thing is an example of why I have, wisely it would seem, previously refrained from engaging in flame wars, because I would get no satisfaction from humiliating you even if I was capable of doing so, a capability I am not claiming btw.

Despite your posts mostly containing personal insults, I have directed very few at you, and in my conceit and arrogance have been amused to watch you run both sides of the argument. Telling you I was old and fat after you offered a truce was an obviously failed attempt at self-deprecation, but you chose to omit that part and sig "I am large and strong", it would seem as an example of my arrogance.

I would be happy however to go back and repeat my support for someone whom I regard as a friend (I think he might also be an English teacher btw) against him being called a whoremonger, and ironically Mdub's and JK's main beef against Keshav is exactly what you accuse me of doing to you, ie that he constantly condescends to them, although I have not as yet followed you to an entirely separate forum to continue doing so.

My politics as it happens are both similar to what they were when I was 25, and it would seem similar to yours, and it was his racism that made me particularly abhor the most recent previous conservative prime minister, who was quite the young fascist even when he was 19 when we were contemporaries at university those several decades ago. In regard to punk you seemed to be implying that the punk musicians had sold out, although I am reluctant to draw any implications given the web you have spun from implications mostly not intended by me you have drawn from my posts. I think for most of them it was mainly showbiz, and I have no problem with those who continue to perform 40 years later because they enjoy it. I was obviously on board with the anti-Thatcherism of course, and I don't think guys who did have genuine political convictions like John Lydon and Joe Strummer ever renounced them.


I have PMd you but apparently not reached you. As per requests by Mssrs Stylie a and The Knockers I would likewise request you not drag me into conversations that don't involve me if you are going to repeat nonsense tropes which I under my current agreement - cannot offer contrapoint without igniting flames I and al concerned wish to leave behind. If you want to leave all objectivity behind in order to maintain favor with the prevailing gestalt that's your business. But kindly have decency not to repeat nonsense about me to bolster your arguments. I thought you knew me better - but apparently you don't.


Happy to talk racing with you any time. Otherwise let old wounds heal and sleeping dogs lie.
 
I would be happy however to go back and repeat my support for someone whom I regard as a friend (I think he might also be an English teacher btw) against him being called a whoremonger, and ironically Mdub's and JK's main beef against Keshav is exactly what you accuse me of doing to you, ie that he constantly condescends to them, although I have not as yet followed you to an entirely separate forum to continue doing so.

I have PMd you but apparently not reached you. As per requests by Mssrs Stylie a and The Knockers I would likewise request you not drag me into conversations that don't involve me if you are going to repeat nonsense tropes which I under my current agreement - cannot offer contrapoint without igniting flames I and al concerned wish to leave behind. If you want to leave all objectivity behind in order to maintain favor with the prevailing gestalt that's your business. But kindly have decency not to repeat nonsense about me to bolster your arguments. I thought you knew me better - but apparently you don't.


Happy to talk racing with you any time. Otherwise let old wounds heal and sleeping dogs lie.

You proved his point. If you really wanted to let sleeping dogs lie and not get your point across you wouldn't have attempted to insult me. Go back to your vaycay(not an insult).
 

Recent Discussions