<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(mylexicon @ Sep 3 2007, 09:22 PM) [snapback]88623[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
So you only need 3 good performances over the course of 2 years to be good in the dry. You're nuts!!!! So by that logic someone who wins three times over the course of two years must be a winner?!
Uh oh, sounds like some CV loving Australians are going to have to eat some humble pie
I agree, people said CV was a wet specialist (and Laguna) only because it was true. There has now been a change in his form and hes moved up a level in the dry, so the tag becomes irrelevant. This does not change the fact that it used to be the case, hopefuly though his form continues.
So you only need 3 good performances over the course of 2 years to be good in the dry. You're nuts!!!! So by that logic someone who wins three times over the course of two years must be a winner?!
I agree, people said CV was a wet specialist (and Laguna) only because it was true. There has now been a change in his form and hes moved up a level in the dry, so the tag becomes irrelevant. This does not change the fact that it used to be the case, hopefuly though his form continues.