Joined May 2009
6K Posts | 4K+
Shovel's Club
Dubs is a genius
Mdubs is the only one that got it right. .
At least both sides can agree on one thing.
Dubs is a genius
Mdubs is the only one that got it right. .
At least both sides can agree on one thing.
You mean YOUR plan would be working to perfection. Everything you just stated is your own personal opinion/theory and you have absolutely no factual data to back up any of it. It's not "their" plan, it's yours.
You believe the reasons for his crashes today were BS? He knows the same truth that motogpforum.com knows, but doesn't want to face the backlash by speaking it?
Just for my interest, what in Povol's post is non- factual? Not that Rossi prefers hard carcass tyres and Jorge soft ones, nor that MM is equally suited by Rossi's tyre preference, nor that the Michelin race day tyres were specifically tailored, nor that MM is riding more sensibly or in a more mature fashion this year, and probably not even that MM's current bike is inferior.
There is a difference between you not wanting things to be true and them not actually being true.
I said way back when that Michelin would be instructed to build a tire with a stiff carcass the way Rossi likes them.
That's not saying he is getting anything like the SNS' that were not only tailored carcass wise, but to a specific compound to match each and every track and its race day conditions. Today's tires are made with the stiff carcass which favors Rossi over Lorenzo, but like I said back then at the same time, that stiff construction also is what Marquez favors.
If they went with the soft carcass, Lorenzo and Marquez beat Rossi, if they use the harder carcass, Lorenzo drops out of the equation and Rossi only has to deal with Marquez, upping his chances considerably to win the title. If it weren't for the unexpected errors on Rossi's part and the new found maturity of Marquez while riding an inferior machine, their plan would be worhing to perfection.
Lorenzo is not stupid, he will not burn the bridge he has to come back across in 2019. Him leaving Yamaha was pure and simple to get away from a toxic teammate he hoped would retire. Once Roosi re upped for 2 more years, Lorenzo knew right then He was going to take a money run for the next couple of years then rejoin Yamaha once the poisonous element has gone away. He will not speak badly of Yamaha unless it gets blatant like the Spies episode.
I don't believe that, but are you concerned about Lorenzo losing too much confidence to if he struggles for two years on the Duc? You think he'll be able to return to winning form like Rossi? He also has to stay motivated to want to put in the work to return to winning form.
Lorenzo is not stupid, he will not burn the bridge he has to come back across in 2019. Him leaving Yamaha was pure and simple to get away from a toxic teammate he hoped would retire. Once Roosi re upped for 2 more years, Lorenzo knew right then He was going to take a money run for the next couple of years then rejoin Yamaha once the poisonous element has gone away. He will not speak badly of Yamaha unless it gets blatant like the Spies episode.
Lorenzo is a far more talented rider than rossi ever was or ever will be. rossi has returned untalented wit a few wins Lorenzo should get wins on the Duc. .... and even if he returns to Yamaha we can expect his perfomance to be far above that of rossi.
I fully appreciate that the conclusions Povol drew are his opinion, but all of the matters I listed on which he based his conclusions/opinions are fairly factual.Lets break it down.
Are there any references for this? Do we know the tire specifications that were given to Michelin?
Could a reason modern GP tires utilize a stiffer carcass compared to decade old tires be increases horsepower, speed, and cornering forces? How stiff is "too stiff" for Lorenzo? Lorenzo struggled at times on Bridgestones when he couldn't find edge grip and I say again... he has already won 3 races on Michelins.
Objection your Honor! Conjecture!
I fully appreciate that the conclusions Povol drew are his opinion, but all of the matters I listed on which he based his conclusions/opinions are fairly factual.
Here's some factual data for you. The Michelin rep has admitted they didn't bring a soft front tire at all for this weekend. They have a 'medium' which is in fact harder than the asymmetric hard on the right. The 'recommended' tire for the weekend, the one with the yellow ring around it. I know you wouldn't understand, but basically since France the riders have found the hard is the only useable option. Normally at least a few riders would go for medium, but the one obvious rider that would prefer softer tires, yes you guessed it, the 2015 world champ.You mean YOUR plan would be working to perfection. Everything you just stated is your own personal opinion/theory and you have absolutely no factual data to back up any of it. It's not "their" plan, it's yours.
Here's some factual data for you. The Michelin rep has admitted they didn't bring a soft front tire at all for this weekend. They have a 'medium' which is in fact harder than the asymmetric hard on the right. The 'recommended' tire for the weekend, the one with the yellow ring around it. I know you wouldn't understand, but basically since France the riders have found the hard is the only useable option. Normally at least a few riders would go for medium, but the one obvious rider that would prefer softer tires, yes you guessed it, the 2015 world champ.
The other undisputed fact from Germany is too many riders have crashed losing the front. The front is too hard, they clearly should have brought a softer option. But they didn't.
Unlike Pov I don't think Marquez or more specifically Honda do so well against Yamaha on soft tires. The problem is Lorenzo becomes unstoppable. But on hard, Marquez is the best. Rossi is boxed in, has been for years, this isn't 2004 against Biaggi and Gibbernau, and this is the reason Rossi hasn't been champ for the longest stretch of his career.
My question for Michelin would be "Would the soft tire last full race distance on a track the demands so much from the left side?"
Fairly factual? Is that like like 2 + 2 = 4.1?
We'll never know, they didn't even bring one to try out. Sound odd?
Irrational numbers are your purview.
As I said, all of the points I listed have a factual basis. Opinions or conclusions based on them are just that as I also said.
Your understanding of numbers and math seems to be pretty poor , similar to your logical thinking. 4.1 is not irrational it is rational. May be you will stop your pseudo intellectual show off and start talking sense
I have give Michelin the benefit of the doubt that the tires they brought are what they feel are best for good performance throughout full race distance. Michelin is not going to offer the soft tires if they don't have confidence they will perform over full race distance. I'm sure they don't want a repeat of Bridgestone's front tire disaster at COTA 2 years ago.
Lorenzo didn't really blame the tires, he said he made mistakes. His fastest lap in Q1 was quite good. For all we know, Lorenzo could be on pace if tomorrow is a dry race (highly unlikely it will be).