<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Gaz @ Oct 15 2009, 09:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Exactly - an opinion, should I not have them?
And correct me, but is it not your opinion that they have already lost most of that anyway?
Or are you asking me my opinion again?
So where is your evidence that they have already lost most of that anyway?
See, it applies both ways.
You can call for evidence to back up the opinions of myself and others, and I can call for you to produce evidence but I tend to think that neither can do so.
I have referenced this above as well, but in the developed world we try to assume one is 'Innocent until proven guilty' so in this case the ones throwing the allegations out there need to provide the proof.
And I know it applies to CS and his detractors as well so don't bother with that retort. So then the CS detractors can use your 'opinion' theory as well, so you can call for evidence to back up the CS sickness conspiracy of myself and others, and I can call for you to produce evidence otherwise, but I 'know' that neither can do so especially if the best Docs in the world can't
I know that CS also requires the 'Innocent until proven guilty' defense so no need to retort that either,
So you can see how it applies both ways too....
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Gaz @ Oct 15 2009, 09:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>But you have made your point/argument in numerous discussions now with myself, Jumkie, Austin and MichaelM and now back with me, to name a few, each time the same arguments apply which from you is basically that VR did not have superior equipment and deserves credit for his achievements - fullstop. When people question aspects (as is their right) you take umbrage and start again with your evidence requirements (and that is fair enough) but you also do not produce evidence that he has not had superior equipment - just your opinion and supposition.
See, it is a vicious circle you want evidence of others who want evidence of you but no conclusive evidence exists thus people surmise and form opinions based upon their reading/interpretation of the known facts (ie. numbers). Personally (and opinion again here) I strongly suspect that many within the game do not know the truth themselves as they are pawns and basically get on with their bit of the equation, as should we.
Gaz
Note: Crap, found out there is a limit to the number of quoted blocks one can use - doh
'Innocent until proven guilty......innocent until proven guilty'
Your right we should get on with it, and if you didn't attempt to put apart my 'Obvious' Sarcasm we wouldn't be here but you did and here we are. What goes around comes around......
I'm not the one accusing VR of these things, I'm defending him and his achievements in the sport. So sorry for the repetition, but those silly enough to throw the rocks at VR need to be told time and time again, and eventually they might learn, no guarantees though.....
And correct me, but is it not your opinion that they have already lost most of that anyway?
Or are you asking me my opinion again?
So where is your evidence that they have already lost most of that anyway?
See, it applies both ways.
You can call for evidence to back up the opinions of myself and others, and I can call for you to produce evidence but I tend to think that neither can do so.
I have referenced this above as well, but in the developed world we try to assume one is 'Innocent until proven guilty' so in this case the ones throwing the allegations out there need to provide the proof.
And I know it applies to CS and his detractors as well so don't bother with that retort. So then the CS detractors can use your 'opinion' theory as well, so you can call for evidence to back up the CS sickness conspiracy of myself and others, and I can call for you to produce evidence otherwise, but I 'know' that neither can do so especially if the best Docs in the world can't
I know that CS also requires the 'Innocent until proven guilty' defense so no need to retort that either,
So you can see how it applies both ways too....
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Gaz @ Oct 15 2009, 09:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>But you have made your point/argument in numerous discussions now with myself, Jumkie, Austin and MichaelM and now back with me, to name a few, each time the same arguments apply which from you is basically that VR did not have superior equipment and deserves credit for his achievements - fullstop. When people question aspects (as is their right) you take umbrage and start again with your evidence requirements (and that is fair enough) but you also do not produce evidence that he has not had superior equipment - just your opinion and supposition.
See, it is a vicious circle you want evidence of others who want evidence of you but no conclusive evidence exists thus people surmise and form opinions based upon their reading/interpretation of the known facts (ie. numbers). Personally (and opinion again here) I strongly suspect that many within the game do not know the truth themselves as they are pawns and basically get on with their bit of the equation, as should we.
Gaz
Note: Crap, found out there is a limit to the number of quoted blocks one can use - doh
'Innocent until proven guilty......innocent until proven guilty'
Your right we should get on with it, and if you didn't attempt to put apart my 'Obvious' Sarcasm we wouldn't be here but you did and here we are. What goes around comes around......
I'm not the one accusing VR of these things, I'm defending him and his achievements in the sport. So sorry for the repetition, but those silly enough to throw the rocks at VR need to be told time and time again, and eventually they might learn, no guarantees though.....