My turn
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Ok here we go anyway cause I'm bored, this is the first time I've heard you admit that anyone bar Rossi has had Superior equipment-are we getting somewhere??
Oh you must have missed many of my posts, even those with relation to Stoner so you may want to revisit some but you may also want to rethink as I have never said that only Rossi has had superior equipment - you may have me confused with others there. You may also be interested to search and you will also find that I have never said that he has always had the 'best equipment'.
So, as a reminder for you and to paraphrase many of my other posts - there is no doubt that many riders have equipment that is not available to others - ergo, superior equipment, even Rossi.
So, now, let me say are you saying he has superior equipment - sounds like it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>So did it occur for Rossi and a variety of other riders? To bring it up means that you need some serious evidence to back up who got them, what advantage, if any, did they gain and how did this affect each Championship race, this doesn't account for Rossi's Titles in 2008, 2001, 1999, 1997 either
You know the answer to this and I have posted it previously but again, just for you.
The 'overnight' specials were made for many riders throughout the various eras and were made to their individual specifications, requirements or preferences. Yes Rossi was one of these riders who would have received these 'specials' and this has been acknowledged by Michelin at various times (even seem to recall VR alluding to it in interviews). Was he alone in his era - highly doubtful as I would expect the likes of the team #1 who used Michelin to have had the opportunity.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Me thinks you thinks very wrong here mate......I have seen many, many posts saying that this is the only reason VR has won anything
Lets agree to disagree as I don't see people saying the sole reason, but see people mentioning it as a contributory reason.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Any proof please.......written or Video, credible as well please....
I will not quote opinion as fact (unlike some) and as you can see in the original post it is just that, an opinion, as is yours that he has little to no influence.
Do I have proof - nope, just as you have no proof that he does not but for mine and I will say again, his sheer pulling power means that many decisions would have been made by DORNA with him in mind (whether he played an active part is another question).
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Proof again please........if he had so much influence why are we still watching 800's? Hasn't VR been vehemently opposed to the 800's since their conception? And if Drona caved into VR's preferences even if he didn't want it.....how can this be then called manipulation or deliberate manipulation to gain advantage?
VR only became extremely vocal about the 800's once they had been experienced - not so much prior though one does not really know what his preferences were at that time. Certainly however, since he has experienced the machines he has become extremely vocal as an opponent of the 800cc formula (as are a number of the riders)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Fair point he has attracted some wallys, but surely through his mass-appeal the sport has also gained some Fair-dinkum fans for life which can't be a bad thing.....I know a lot of Aussies who have only been watching since 2007 in hope that CS can beat him again, so on the Flip side it can be said that CS attracted a lot of patriarchal wallys himself, door swings both ways. Nickys title in 06-same can be said and so on and so on....
Absolutely the door swings both ways and I fully expected you to make that point and in fact, before your time in this forum was a Stoner fan called CSCVAW who (as surprising as this may be for some of the newer members), made many of todays 'wallys' seem tame (and I believe was banned). So yep, fully works both ways sadly but again, weight of numbers means that there is more yellow than red at the moment so they are more noticeable.
As for the fans, I have no doubt that there will be a large number who stay as they will have seen something in the sport, it is not these people whom are the 'wallys' (to use your term). But, and I will use your own statements here, no doubt CS has bought people along who will stay as well (as an example) so the more that watch, enjoy and remain the merrier.
Again I will say, that for me, the VR phenomenon is parralleled with that of Tiger Woods and the very same type of fandom issues are occurring and being experienced - as with MGP, golf will be at a crossroad of sorts when Tiger gives up the game.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>you feeling ok? Though the praise was for his Media string pulling and not riding ability....
Where have I dissed his riding - fark, no matter how stupid you may think me, I sure as crap aint that stupid.
I have said before and will say again, he is a phenomenon and if you review my posts you will see I often use that word (and acquaint him with Tigers impactfor Golf) which should surely give an insight into my thoughts. Where I rate him is irrespective because of my own 500cc bias, but there is no doubt at all that his records will remain for a great many years and possibly, for all time.
And yes, he does manipulate the media brilliantly and this is actually why many people like him so as he often plays with the media. But that also means that he uses them for his own wants and needs, something that every person in the paddock will and should be doing as that increases their marketability and therefore income potential.
To put it simply (now - sit down here) people new to the game should watch, listen and learn how 'teamRossi' works in regards to the media as it will only benefit them in the long run (and not criticism of CS/DP there as they choose not to).
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Yes indeed, times have changed but if you are to ridicule the talent then his reasons and other relevant talent reasons in the past need to be addressed as a point of reference in defense
Gotta be honest, this line kinda lost me a bit and after a few reads still does.
The point that for me is most relevant is that he is whinging, whining and complaining - we have seen articles and at times video where he is taking potshots of sorts.
The secondary to that point is that he is fully allowed and within his rights as are all these riders allowed to be critical, but the fact it is VR being so public is unusual and open for comment is it not?
What I do always find interesting is the defense often taken that when VR is criticised for a comment, people will say that he is entitled to make such comments because of his record - I say fair enough. But, why then aren't others entitled to be critical of similar/same aspects as personally, record should mean little dependent on the topic being discussed (ie. history of racing VR wins over JL, Yamaha current performance both have equal right to discuss).
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Not at all, but you gave satirical reference to Stoner's derogatory posts, and not VR's, Pedders, Gibbers etc.....and how is this different?.....so I ask why don't you give us your satirical spin on the others as I did with VR's, oh hang on you were busy arguing Rossi's Ridiculous detractors comments I highlighted, hmmmm maybe I should have made you assistant to the prosecution instead!!!
Surely you do a good enough job yourself of arguing the detractors but hey, when I see the same level of personal attacks launched against VR, the unfounded allegations that remain unrproven at this point given they have no credible sources, then I will create a satirical response.
What I find interesting is that you seem so hung up on people making .... of other fans in a satirical sense with no personal attack or abuse, will you now take the same level of umbrage when similar is done against others.
Nope, thought not as now I have been promoted up the order in your satirical sense.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 14 2009, 12:36 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Answered this one.....and once again you can see my colours.....but others sadly try to hide theirs, not too well I might add...
Woohoo, labelled again and yep, you sure have shown your colours proudly.
Again I will say it, even though it will not be believed but nope I am not a Stoner fan in the same manner as you are with VR etc but I do and will put my thoughts into the realm when racing is being discussed whether it be the popular line or not. If by doing this people wish to label me as a fan of rider X than I guess so be it but I also expect that I will remain watching the sport well beyond many making the accusations.
And to any local fans in the area, you are more than welcome to come to my house, inspect it for any paraphernalia as you will only find very little dating back some years - I actually have nothing from the last 10 years or so - a fan of the sport, yes, a fan of a rider - not in MGP.
Gaz