- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 3,802
- Location
- Tuscany, Italy
Jumkie
You negate the obvious thing like natural decline caused by age (and some trauma), -- my dear Jum, -- only because you want to push your theory as usual -- i.e. the rider called Valentino Rossi has never been that good and only won a string of titles in the 500-990 era, and again a couple of titles against the younger generation of riders in the 800 era, because of preferential treatment etc.
Now that apparently he's not that fast any more, you can finally target a sitting duck, shouting in exultation, "see, I always told you, he's no good and never was any good".
Your usual flawed logic. Feel free to carry on, if that satisfies you. But why bother me...
3509821367993147
U mistake "decline" with not having exclusively all his way on a competitive machine, with special tires to boot. No "decline", just normal for his talent given the reality that most other riders have dealt with all their careers. Rossi would have been another Roberts JR, Lorenzo, Pedrosa had he not been given every possible exclusive benefit (while detrimental to others). Had he been on a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD to other similarly talented riders, as he is NOW, his records would have been 1/5 of what they are now.
You negate the obvious thing like natural decline caused by age (and some trauma), -- my dear Jum, -- only because you want to push your theory as usual -- i.e. the rider called Valentino Rossi has never been that good and only won a string of titles in the 500-990 era, and again a couple of titles against the younger generation of riders in the 800 era, because of preferential treatment etc.
Now that apparently he's not that fast any more, you can finally target a sitting duck, shouting in exultation, "see, I always told you, he's no good and never was any good".
Your usual flawed logic. Feel free to carry on, if that satisfies you. But why bother me...