Rossi says relationship with Marquez “can never be recovered”

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
It makes a lot of sense. MM robs him of a world title, then goes and offers him his hand... of course! Why wouldn't Rossi be in conciliatory mood right? What difference does it make one more championship when you already have nine? Seriously guys, did you have an overdose of Disney crap when you were kids or what?

Neither Rossi nor ANYBODY IN THIS WORLD would ever forgive something like that, it's impossible. IMPOSSIBLE. Rossi KNOWS what Marquez did, Yamaha KNOW what Marquez did, Dorna KNOWS what Marquez did. EVERY ONE IN THE F PADDOCK KNOWS what Marquez did. Everyone. Marquez has no choice but to keep lying now, he has to go all the way with all that ........ for the rest of his career. It works with some people, so it's worth to keep trying to save face. It is as simple as that.

Wow ......:eek:

Fruitcake of the week alert!!!
 
Dani did not get faster at the end of Valencia (again, see lap times). It was Lorenzo who got slower. Marquez looked like he didn't even know where to put the bike to avoid overtaking JL by mistake. If Rossi was 4th, Lorenzo could be 2nd and still win, but MM could not overtake him because he knew that if he did, then Dani would pass JL too and hand the title to Rossi.

Bradley Smith issues has been reported to death by the denialist camp, it's a one off, and even in that case normal tyre heating/cooling rates/cycles would not explain MM's times. They're far more erratic than you'd get from any tyre problem.

At least some of you don't bother to hide all the hate. You guys need to get laid more...
See you later,i'm off to get laid right now as a matter of fact........
 
and irrespective of your view, only one rider broke the rules

It's debatable if VR broke any rules, but I never said MM broke any rules, he didn't, that's why VR was helpless. But that's another debate, are we denying what MM did or are we saying he did it but it wasn't against the rules.
 
It's debatable if VR broke any rules, but I never said MM broke any rules, he didn't, that's why VR was helpless. But that's another debate, are we denying what MM did or are we saying he did it but it wasn't against the rules.

How is it debatable ............ Race Control determined that he had breached the rules of the sport .......... how is that debatable?

Or are you saying that in your opinion he breached no rules?

Again we disagree.

Not denying anything, but as I said I disagree with your take so take from that what you choose
 
She's still with me so don't rush.

Ask her if she wants me to pickup dinner on the way home, I mean if she just got to yours I know she will be home in the next 15 - 20 minutes :p


But all is good, she married me so is used to disappointment in her life
 
RD aren't always right are they? Do you think they were right when Capiross won the title by clearly deliberately ramming Harada out of the race?

RD were under pressure to do "something", and they did say that Marquez had not been riding in the spirit of the sport etc. They penalised Rossi more for what it looked like than for what he actually did. He was ahead went wide and slowed down, never took MM off track and left him plenty of space. He did not make intentional contact. What rule, specifically, did he break?
 
RD aren't always right are they? Do you think they were right when Capiross won the title by clearly deliberately ramming Harada out of the race?

RD were under pressure to do "something", and they did say that Marquez had not been riding in the spirit of the sport etc. They penalised Rossi more for what it looked like than for what he actually did. He was ahead went wide and slowed down, never took MM off track and left him plenty of space. He did not make intentional contact. What rule, specifically, did he break?

Rossi kicked Marquez .
 
RD aren't always right are they? Do you think they were right when Capiross won the title by clearly deliberately ramming Harada out of the race?

Nope, and now you open a can of worms as many feel that the decision to only dock points and not black flag was weak so just as they may get decisions as to what is a penalty or what is not a penalty wrong, they may also get the penalty wrong.

RD were under pressure to do "something", and they did say that Marquez had not been riding in the spirit of the sport etc. They penalised Rossi more for what it looked like than for what he actually did. He was ahead went wide and slowed down, never took MM off track and left him plenty of space. He did not make intentional contact. What rule, specifically, did he break?

You are right they did say that Marquez may NOT have been riding within the spirit, but what is the spirit and where is it defined within rules as that is against which people can be judged ........... but they also only said it AFTER the public brouhaha caused by the Thursday press conference and the vitriolic responses in the public gallery.

As for the highlighted you are wrong - it had nothing to do with looks or what he looked like (not sure what you are insinuating there - perhaps you are channelling a little Lleyton Hewitt) but it had more to do with what Rossi admitted which was intentionally slowing down below race pace with the sole aim to run Marquez wide to disrupt Marquez' race pace and give a signal of WTF.

BTW, as for you last part - review the sepang thread (linked earlier to save the work ofsearching - we try to help newbies around here) for my comments of the incident - you may surprise yourself
 
He did not make intentional contact. What rule, specifically, did he break?

Mike Webb, MotoGP director:

“Valentino reacted to what he saw as provocation from Marquez and unfortunately his reaction was a manoeuvre that was against the rules. It's irresponsible riding, causing a crash. So he's been penalised for that. We believe the contact was deliberate. He says he did not want Marquez to crash, but he did want to run him wide.”

I can't wait to see how you are going to dispell this one.
 
That is a false statement.

Technically no it is not.

The word 'deliberate' was not used and there is little doubt that the foot is removed from the pegs ....... and before you start, again please refer my link supplied to you earlier and review the Sepang thread for my thoughts
 
So you claim Marquez is a cheat because he rode in a manner that was trying to influence the outcome of a championship.
What about Rossi trying to deliberately run Lorenzo off the track at Motegi in 2010, when he actually sideswiped him.
Surely by your standards Rossi is guilty of the same?
Does that mean you would advocate Rossi being known as a cheat who tried to alter the outcome of a championship too?
 
So you claim Marquez is a cheat because he rode in a manner that was trying to influence the outcome of a championship.
What about Rossi trying to deliberately run Lorenzo off the track at Motegi in 2010, when he actually sideswiped him.
Surely by your standards Rossi is guilty of the same?
Does that mean you would advocate Rossi being known as a cheat who tried to alter the outcome of a championship too?


Or Petrucci who made so much room at Valencia that they damn near landed a jumbo in the gap left for Rossi to pass
 
So you claim Marquez is a cheat because he rode in a manner that was trying to influence the outcome of a championship.
What about Rossi trying to deliberately run Lorenzo off the track at Motegi in 2010, when he actually sideswiped him.
Surely by your standards Rossi is guilty of the same?
Does that mean you would advocate Rossi being known as a cheat who tried to alter the outcome of a championship too?

Rossi was racing to win in Motegi 2010, not deliberately slowing down to .... with Lorenzo. You can argue that Rossi could have been more careful with his team mate there, but it has nothing to do with MM's antics in 2015.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top