Depends what you mean. People either think that:
1) Rossi made false accusations after Australia.
2) Ross told the truth, but Marquez was entitled to act the way he did in revenge for Argentina, where Rossi took Marc out of the race intentionally.
3) Rossi told the truth, and he did not intentionally take out Marquez in Argentina.
Nobody can prove/disprove anything, but from intuition and observation, scenario 1) doesn't make sense to me. Between 2) and 3) I don't know, but neither would portray Rossi as "cracking", but merely trying to stop something questionable happening on the track that wasn't against the rules. In that case, perhaps he should have tried to address it directly with Marquez first? So that may have been a mistake, but he had to do something.
. 
