<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (VHMP01 @ Sep 28 2009, 12:19 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>After no medical reports, Sponsors claim an apology. We are discussing on a thread all over this, and you do not see people attacking Marlboro for the sake of it?
No I seriously don't see it as an attack just for the sake of attack of the sponsor to 'attempt' to divert attention from any issues and in reality we are assuming that there have been no medical reports made available to the sponsor.
People are attacking Marlboro (if that is what is happening) for the sake of defending Stoner's rights to silence, the hypocrisy of Marlboro's spokesman (perceived or real) or any other reason that is valid as they are a company that sells an addictive product, alebit legal at this tage.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (VHMP01 @ Sep 28 2009, 12:19 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>We don’t. But as the boss who pays the bills? Come on Gaz! Of course there could be a privacy clause asked by Stoners representatives so if anything goes public they could sue Marlboro. But as the Article implies, they have got nothing and don’t know anything either.
Marlboro are Ducati's boss from my understanding and sponsor Ducati, not Stoner at a personal level.
So, they should be directing their commentary at Ducati (if they needed to make commentary) as it is the responsibility of Ducati to provide Marlboro with information, not Stoner and if Marlboro do not know, then they should address it with Ducati.
Is it any different to a customer of a business demanding an apology from and employeee of the business for an employees absence?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (VHMP01 @ Sep 28 2009, 12:19 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I think this was why he kept seeing diverse ‘Doctors’ before going back home and all of the sudden… As if by magic… And with no Report… Go fishing! That’s it?
So stupid point, do you trust every docyot you see to diagnose you accurately whicn those doctors do not know you personal history?
Would you trust a general practitioner to diagnose a cancer without first having undetaken numerous tests to determine and clarift teh exact condition and location of that cancer?
I wouldn't.
I have doctors I trust and whom I have had experience with who would somehow be unable to diagnose that a corpse has died.
Gaz