Just to weigh in on the Bostrom debate (and I'm a non-American who wasn't really aware of his credentials) I think in a sense his team can be very satisfied with his weekend. Independently of what he's done on other bikes, he's brought money and attention to the team and has improved steadily throughout the weekend. Here in Spain a lot's been made of the fact that Toni's sponsors have been unhappy, and the ultimatum issued earlier in the season was on their orders. The single most important piece of information for me was this: Bostrom's fastest race lap was a 1'24.091 on a bike he hardly had time to get to know and with a crew he hadn't met till Friday, and all this on those Bridgestone tyres that continue to give even the top riders headaches. By comparison Toni Elias was only capable of a 1'24.200 in the race. When we look back on Toni's time in MotoGP I think we'll see this race not as the beginning of the end (he's never settled in on the GP bikes since they stopped custom-building his rear tyres) but as the first nail in the coffin. Why? Because Elias insists that it's the bike that's a fault, but now we have a rider who (unlike Elias) has never really won anything but is able to step in and beat Toni (over a single lap, and passing him in the race) with almost no preparation.
I feel bad for Elias, and it's never pleasant to see a rider suffer because of equipment issues rather than talent issues (eg almost anyone on a Ducati, Michelin riders in the last season with two tyre manufacturers, etc.). Where can the lad go now?
To WSBK with Kawasaki ?