This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jorge $13,000,000 contract with Ducati

jumkie if you read again your post, dont you think you sound like the one who knows it all and thinks everyone else is a fool or something? all of us that are just simple spectators, cant possibly know for sure what is going on except if you are indeed an insider or something in motogp.

even if what you say is true, even if rossi did have special tyres in the 990s, even if everyone now races rossi's preferable tyres, even if he is half as good as his records show, and he has soooooo much power in this world that has blinded everyone but you, then what can i say, the man must be a true genious then, fooling everybody.. so hats off to him! hahah, true fanboy, i guess i am, right?
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Aug 21 2009, 07:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Yes, a brand. Les you boys forget that Mick Doohan won 5 titles also, but was never much of a marketing jewel. Rossi is a promoter's wet dream. You boys love to say Rossi, the "8" time world champ, but lower class titles don't count. Rossi has so far won ONLY one more title than Doohan; yet Rossi has legend status as the GOAT. Why? Well, quite frankly, we love the guy not just for his success but for his personality. Something Doohan lacked, and hell something Stoner, though he put in the most amazing season in 07, has been jeered because he isn't great for PR.
Jumkie your special rider even could not win those lower class titles as well shame!!!!.To stir things up guys i just got some info from inside the paddock (could well be same soruce as jumkie's guys) that CS has been getting special ducati fitted with special engine and special tyre's compare to all his teammates and the reason for that was, dorna wanted some body else to win the championship apart from Rossi in 07.

This clarify the special performance CS put it in 2007, before that he could hardly win anything even those lower class championships as well.
<
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (inam @ Aug 21 2009, 03:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>dorna wanted some body else to win the championship apart from Rossi in 07.
(EDIT) Just out of interest, why exactly?. You may be attempting sarcasm, but on the available evidence ie the effects of their rule changes they would only have contrived a championship for stoner and ducati if their aim had been the opposite.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Aug 21 2009, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>+1? Arent u the same person?

Just because they have matching intelligence deficits?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (two-stroke @ Aug 20 2009, 05:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Casey Stoner IS the only human being on the planet to take the Ducati to consistent success in the 800cc era.
I think the word your looking for is "did" !
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (michaelm @ Aug 21 2009, 03:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Just out of interest, why exactly?, and you do seem to be implying that dorna manipulate results, something I believe them to be too incompetent to manage even if they tried to do so. I have no evidence for this other than the effects of every rule change they have ever made.
Just having some fun mate, its jumkie who thinks that dorna manipulate results not me.I believe every rider who has won championships in past deserve full credit for that including CS and for sure they have won those with there own abilities and some time slight advantage with there equipment like yamaha has this season so far.

But we got bounch of people here who they think CS is good as Rossi or he is equal to Rossi is just plane stupidity in my opinion.No doubt CS has got great talnet but to class him in same category as Rossi is way too early.Give him few more years then we will see where he stands guys
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Keshav @ Aug 21 2009, 03:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Just because they have matching intelligence deficits?
I have my doubts about your intelligence buddy, i think you didn't get my point go back and read my post again.
 
In 08, how many riders wanted bridgestones? How many riders got bridgestones? You will find your answer right there as to who gets preferential treatment and who this series revolves around.

Nuff said
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (inam @ Aug 21 2009, 04:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Just having some fun mate, its jumkie who thinks that dorna manipulate results not me.I believe every rider who has won championships in past deserve full credit for that including CS and for sure they have won those with there own abilities and some time slight advantage with there equipment like yamaha has this season so far.

But we got bounch of people here who they think CS is good as Rossi or he is equal to Rossi is just plane stupidity in my opinion.No doubt CS has got great talnet but to class him in same category as Rossi is way too early.Give him few more years then we will see where he stands guys
I did realise perhaps belatedly that you were being sarcastic, hence my edited post.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SackWack @ Aug 21 2009, 04:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>In 08, how many riders wanted bridgestones? How many riders got bridgestones? You will find your answer right there as to who gets preferential treatment and who this series revolves around.

Nuff said
You must mean pedrosa !

bear in mind rossi's comtract with michilin had expired. He decided to sign with a different company, nothing to do with dorna just as if his contract with his boots company were up. whereas dani skipped mid season. how many strings do you think he pulled to do that ? you have either a very short or very select memory sacky !
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chopperman @ Aug 21 2009, 04:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>You must mean pedrosa !

bear in mind rossi's comtract with michilin had expired. He decided to sign with a different company, nothing to do with dorna just as if his contract with his boots company were up. whereas dani skipped mid season. how many strings do you think he pulled to do that ? you have either a very short or very select memory sacky !
<

Rog, i think he got both problems.
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chopperman @ Aug 21 2009, 10:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>You must mean pedrosa !

bear in mind rossi's comtract with michilin had expired. He decided to sign with a different company, nothing to do with dorna just as if his contract with his boots company were up. whereas dani skipped mid season. how many strings do you think he pulled to do that ? you have either a very short or very select memory sacky !
<

Don't you all remember Bridgestone saying that they wouldn't supply tires to any more riders? Valentino got them before 2008, Pedrosa got them mid-season. There are two powers in this sport and it's been that way for about the past seven years: Valentino Rossi and HRC. Valentino gets what he wants and HRC gets what they want for their chosen rider. It's not surprising Pedro got them midway through the year. What is surprising is that Rossi was able to get them before HRC.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Aug 21 2009, 05:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Don't you all remember Bridgestone saying that they wouldn't supply tires to any more riders? Valentino got them before 2008, Pedrosa got them mid-season. There are two powers in this sport and it's been that way for about the past seven years: Valentino Rossi and HRC. Valentino gets what he wants and HRC gets what they want for their chosen rider. It's not surprising Pedro got them midway through the year. What is surprising is that Rossi was able to get them before HRC.
yes i do remember and if you care to do some digging back you will see i didn't believe bridgstone and there "we cant supply any more bla bla" bollocks back then. i was right because not only did they supply rossi, they also supplied pedro and bid to be the sole supplier. that was just marketing mumbo jumbo. just look at the free press they got out of that.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Aug 21 2009, 05:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Don't you all remember Bridgestone saying that they wouldn't supply tires to any more riders?
Austin, there is no official statement to back this up from Bstone anywhere.I think it was all typical media roumors.(if there is please provide link)

If i remember correctly i heard roumors saying that Bstone can't afford to supply tyres to any more riders and look now they supplying the tyres to whole grid.

Edit: you beat me Rog.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (inam @ Aug 21 2009, 05:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Austin, there is no official statement to back this up from Bstone anywhere.I think it was all typical media roumors.(if there is please provide link)

If i remember correctly i heard roumors saying that Bstone can't afford to supply tyres to any more riders and look now they supplying the tyres to whole grid.

Edit: you beat me Rog.
When Gavin and Nick speak about paddock issues, I take them at their word. They get the low down on everyone, but only give tidbits and reasonably well confirmed info. They said Bstone didn't have the supply capacity.

Of course Bridgestone can supply the whole grid. It's a spec tire with a restricted allocation. I'd bet they are making and spending LESS than they did in 2007.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (clarkjw @ Aug 21 2009, 05:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>When Gavin and Nick speak about paddock issues, I take them at their word. They get the low down on everyone, but only give tidbits and reasonably well confirmed info. They said Bstone didn't have the supply capacity.

Of course Bridgestone can supply the whole grid. It's a spec tire with a restricted allocation. I'd bet they are making and spending LESS than they did in 2007.
If that's true then where being robbed and this was yet another stupid rule that was detrimental to our sport. To be honest i cant see that being correct.

and who the .... is Gavin and Nick ?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chopperman @ Aug 21 2009, 09:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>yes i do remember and if you care to do some digging back you will see i didn't believe bridgstone and there "we cant supply any more bla bla" bollocks back then. i was right because not only did they supply rossi, they also supplied pedro and bid to be the sole supplier. that was just marketing mumbo jumbo. just look at the free press they got out of that.

For those of us that don't remember let me outline what happened.
Casey blitzed the field in 07.
Rossi wanted the same tires for 08.
Bridgestone said no.
Rossi strong arm tactics forced Bridgestone.
Rossi gets tires for 08
Other riders speak up including Pedro
They get denied
They speak up more.
They get denied.
Pedro speak for 3/4 of the season and finally gets the tires
This after he has no shot at the title

Make no mistake Pedro wanted the tires at the beginnig of 08 as well. Only one rider/team got them. Hmmmmmmmmmm
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SackWack @ Aug 21 2009, 06:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>For those of us that don't remember let me outline what happened.
Casey blitzed the field in 07.
Rossi wanted the same tires for 08.
Bridgestone said no.
Rossi strong arm tactics forced Bridgestone.
Rossi gets tires for 08
Other riders speak up including Pedro
They get denied
They speak up more.
They get denied.
Pedro speak for 3/4 of the season and finally gets the tires
This after he has no shot at the title

Make no mistake Pedro wanted the tires at the beginnig of 08 as well. Only one rider/team got them. Hmmmmmmmmmm
conveniently missed a few key facts out there sacky . i think its just sour grapes because hayden was denied.
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chopperman @ Aug 21 2009, 10:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>conveniently missed a few key facts out there sacky . i think its just sour grapes because hayden was denied.
<


Definitely
<
If he had the Bridgestones he would have been challenging for the championship.
 
OK, late to the show but......Rog, have you been giving Jumkie Merrydown and Westons again? Something has gone terribly wrong here!

Now youv'e "proved" Rossi is crap, what's next? A 400 page essay on how Stoner really won the title last year? The fact the 07 Duke was a missile past Rossi et all was down to camera angles?

It's the old thing buddy, not all Rossi fans are brainless 10 year olds who have never followed GP racing. I'm on my way out so I'm not going to join in tonight, but come on, it's getting silly!

Pete
 

Recent Discussions