<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (michaelm @ Sep 28 2008, 07:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Whatever people might think of lex's more outre speculations, I agree with his opinion of dorna. They are accountants and purveyors of multimedia product in my view, and not bike racing guys. Whilst I accept the need for funding and competent financial management, I don't think short term TV ratings should be the entire object of the sport.
Amen. Over-emphasis on the short term = long term catastrophe.
Why are they making a control tire?
DORNA wants people to believe it's about the competition. The storyline is supposed to show Michelin leaving because they aren't competitive. They've lost all of their good riders to Bridgestone and now they are packing it in. Michelin simply don't have 40% of the grid and now their being thrown out.
What does Ezy's tenure show?
He is willing to let one manufacturer be awful. He is willing to let a manufacturer supply as little as 1 team. Vale is on the best tires so he has no need to give everyone the same equipment.
This entire control tire controversy is about cornering speeds and safety. Do you think this sense of urgency started after the tire meetings of 2007? or did it start after Pedrosa left when Michelin were awful at Brno. Hmmmm...........I wonder.
If no control tire is imposed, there is absolutely no way they will move forward without unwritten guarantees from the tire manufacturers to control lateral acceleration. I wonder if perhaps they have already tried their hand at it a few times, to find out if such a plan is even feasible.
K, I'm done.
Amen. Over-emphasis on the short term = long term catastrophe.
Why are they making a control tire?
DORNA wants people to believe it's about the competition. The storyline is supposed to show Michelin leaving because they aren't competitive. They've lost all of their good riders to Bridgestone and now they are packing it in. Michelin simply don't have 40% of the grid and now their being thrown out.
What does Ezy's tenure show?
He is willing to let one manufacturer be awful. He is willing to let a manufacturer supply as little as 1 team. Vale is on the best tires so he has no need to give everyone the same equipment.
This entire control tire controversy is about cornering speeds and safety. Do you think this sense of urgency started after the tire meetings of 2007? or did it start after Pedrosa left when Michelin were awful at Brno. Hmmmm...........I wonder.
If no control tire is imposed, there is absolutely no way they will move forward without unwritten guarantees from the tire manufacturers to control lateral acceleration. I wonder if perhaps they have already tried their hand at it a few times, to find out if such a plan is even feasible.
K, I'm done.