<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ May 17 2008, 12:17 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Honda didn't have Nicky's chassis specs completed.
So Nicky didn't have the parts/chassis specs/08 bike/whatever it is that you're claiming for Qatar, because it wasn't completed...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ May 17 2008, 12:17 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Anyway, Peders parts were made first (for obvious reasons) and Nicky's chassis specs weren't ready.
Whereas Dani got the parts/chassis specs/08 bike/whatever it is that you're claiming, but Nicky didn't, because the parts/chassis specs/08 bike/whatever it is that you're claiming weren't ready for him...
Okay, following you so far.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ May 17 2008, 12:17 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Nicky wasn't exactly flying on the new bike, so Honda removed it from him under the grounds that Dani's times were markedly better on the 2008 chassis as compared to the 07 and Hayden's weren't.
He wasn't flying on the what? Who got the what? And from whom? Kinda lost me here.
Let me see if I can untangle the gordian knot that you simply sliced...
1. Hayden didn't have the parts/chassis specs/08 bike/whatever it is that you're claiming.
2. Pedrosa did.
3. But, after Pedrosa crashed his bike, he took the parts/chassis specs/08 bike/whatever it is that you're claiming away from Hayden--who, by the way, didn't have the parts/chassis specs/08 bike/whatever it is that you're claiming because they weren't ready--and Hayden was left with... what? A #69 plate?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ May 17 2008, 12:17 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>revealed through rumor and fact...
Perhaps the most telling part of your post. You tend to conflate rumour and fact, but I have a piece of news for you: the two words have very different meanings.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ May 17 2008, 12:17 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>The end. The bikes belong to Honda they can do whatever they want with their machines.
And the fact that the team took (presumably) the A bike away from Hayden and gave it to Pedrosa in the middle of a race meeting--let's not forget these two riders don't like each other and their loyal crews feel the same way (or maybe Benson just likes to swear on TV)--and the only comment was a shrug of the shoulders from Hayden two weeks later?
I guess the press failed to report such a controversial story because they're all in on the conspiracy...
Funny, that. I never pictured Superbikeplanet.com being a Dorna lap dog.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ May 17 2008, 12:17 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Why can't he comment? The team tells the riders what they can and can't say in press conferences.
Who knew that HRC had made both a Pedrobot and a Haydobot?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ May 17 2008, 12:17 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Nicky isn't going to put his job on the line to spout about one race that got out of hand.
HRC didn't fire Gardner when he told the world the 88 Honda was a piece of ....--and demanded to run the 87 bike unless they fixed the mess real ....... fast.
But you'd have us believe that Nicky will pull his pants down, bend over and watch his career go down the toilet.
Or, could it just
possibly be that the truth is something other that what you so arrogantly declaim from on high?