Ibuprofen doesn't cure dumb. Trust, I've been on a steady regiment lately. It hasn't made me smarter, but at very least its hasn't made my memory evaporate.
So
"nobody was really consistent". Nicky was on the podium 9 of the first 11 races (4 3rds, 3 2nds, 2 1st). So if you saw a picture of the podium you would see Nicky's face almost every time except twice.
"Nobody was really consistent"? Pesky facts, eh. Had it not been for his ........ teammate, he would have finish every single race that season, very rare in GP.
"Nobody was really consistent."? Pesky facts, eh. Of the 17 events, he qualified in the top 5 12 times. So if you saw a picture of the first or second row on the grid, most likely you would see Nicky all season.
"Nobody was really consistent"? Pesky facts, eh. On the few races Nicky didn't podium, only twice was he out of the top five. So that means if Nicky wasn't on the podium, he was either a very close 4th or 5th (other than Pedro's torpedo, where Nicky qualled 3rd, so you can only imagine where he might have finished).
"Nobody was really consistent"? Pesky facts, eh. (Or are these facts "moot" to suit your spin?)
Oh, I almost forgot, here is a smile for you.
When you judge consistency in motogp you have to judge based on other benchmarks. SOOOOOooooo like i said before nobody was really consistent in 06....certainly in terms of Hayden/capirossi, and CERTAINLY compared to seasons before and since. Not like someone was coming in 1st/2nd the entire season as we see the benchmark of consistency today. 06 was all over the place in terms of results.
Capirossi:
1st: 3 times
2nd: 4 times
3rd: 1 time
Hayden:
1st: 2 times
2nd: 3 times
3rd: 5 times
Overall points from podium poistions
Capirossi: 171
Hayden: 190
Wow hardly a massive difference....povol you say capi wasnt consistent on the duc, i say he was barely less cosistent than hayden in terms of podiums. Actually beating him in terms of wins and 2nd places.
Nobody did consistently well in 2006....hence why 2 wins was enough.
In fact as far as seasons go it may well have been a corker, but it was imo(with facts to boot) the most INCONSISTENT season for a long, long while........10+ years in fact!
2000: title winner was 1st 4 times, 2nd 4 times, 3rd 1 time
Total from podiums 196
TOTAL 258
2001: title winner was 1st 11 times, 2nd 1 time, 3rd 1 time
Total from podiums 311
TOTAL 325
2002: title winner was 1st 11 times, 2nd 4 times, 3rd 0 times
Total from podiums 355
TOTAL 355
2003: title winner was 1st 9 times, 2nd 5 times, 3rd 2 times
Total from podiums 357
TOTAL 357
2004: title winner was 1st 9 times, 2nd 2 times, 3rd 0 times
Total from podiums 265
TOTAL 304
2005: title winner was 1st 11 times, 2nd 3 times, 3rd 2 times
Total from podiums 367
TOTAL 367
2006: title winner was 1st 2 times, 2nd 3 times, 3rd 5 times
Total from podiums 190
TOTAL 252
2007: title winner was 1st 10 times, 2nd 2 times, 3rd 2 times
Total from podiums 322
TOTAL 367
2008: title winner was 1st 9 times, 2nd 5 times, 3rd 2 times
Total from podiums 357
TOTAL 373
2009: title winner was 1st 6 times, 2nd 5 times, 3rd 2 times
Total from podiums 282
TOTAL 306
2010: So far lorenzo was 1st 7 times, 2nd 3 times, 3rd 1 time
Total from podiums
251 so far
TOTAL SO FAR 1 less than haydens total for the whole 2006 season
2006 was the weakest season in terms of consistency by far(apart from 2000) of any season of the last 10 years, 2000 came close but was still ahead in total podium points.
The rest make the so called consistency of 2006 look frankly laughable.
Funnily enough in 2009 Dani scored 1st 2 times, 2nd 3 times, and 3rd 6 times....thats 1 more podiums than hayden in 2006 yet it was only enough to just scrape 3rd place overall from Casey(who finished 14 points behind).
It doesnt stop there either...in 2008 Dani scored 1st 2 times, 2nd 5 times, and 3rd 4 times....thats more than 2009 and still only enough for 3rd overall.
Stoner in 2008 had 6 victories and finished on 280 points.....only enough for a distant 2nd.
Only about half of the championships since 2000 would the total points tally for the 2006 winner, even get you 2nd place, the other half would only get you 3rd.
Hardly a shining beacon of consistency?
Those pesky facts, eh?