Joined Oct 2015
2K Posts | 827+
Texas
Answer my question, then I'll answer yours.
Rossi wasn't allowed to take Marc wide or RD would have never hit him with a penalty.
Answer my question, then I'll answer yours.
Iannone was in agreement with Rossi that Marc was intentionally slowing down at PI. Ben Spies posted on his twitter that anyone that doesn't think Marc was clearly faster than Rossi at PI and Sepang is crazy. Everyone else I mentioned commented on Marc's actions at Sepang.
I could claim it is equally obvious that Iannone only made his statement after being reprieved by Rossi from his personal lynch mob and on a promise of a Yamaha factory ride with the same level of evidence as you have for what you claim is obvious.
Ah... hmmm, ok: it must be true then.
So Iannone shares Rossi's opinion about MM's intentions.
Why would he do that if he didn't have access to mind-reading gear and absolutely knew it for a fact? Fair enough!
Oh, wait, Iannone is Italian right? There wouldn't be any repercussions for him if he refused to back Rossi would there? Nah, surely not...
But OK, let's allow all that... where does that leave us? Did MM break any rules?
No mind-reading gear needed, Iannone was right there racing with Rossi and Marc at PI. You can claim that he was only agreeing with Rossi because they're friends, but these guys know abnormal behavior on the track. It's not like they're too stupid to recognize when Marc is unnecessarily slowing down.
Awesome....could you please provide me with a link to Iannone's comments so I can check the date and time they were made.
Cheers.
No mind-reading gear needed, Iannone was right there racing with Rossi and Marc at PI. You can claim that he was only agreeing with Rossi because they're friends, but these guys know abnormal behavior on the track. It's not like they're too stupid to recognize when Marc is unnecessarily slowing down.
What he means by "before" Sepang is at the now infamous pre-race press conference. And Iannone stopped short of saying it was deliberate sabotage but rather his assessment was he thought Marc had more pace. Which is awesome given Iannone nor Rossi are an the current RCV. Iannone, riding a Ducati of all those at the presser should have realized his words would trap him, given he was eerily out of the picture at Sepang. I suppose Marc, a Honda rider, could allege the same accusation, and say Iannone was sandbagging at Sepang so as not to take points from Rossi. Given that...as the bopper logic goes, once you HAVE pace, that translates to ALL THE TIME and at ANY VENUE regardless of ambient CONDITIONS. Yes, we've all read this reasoning, as it's used as levied suspicion for Marquez's acts going back. So then by that exact standard, where the .... was Iannone at Sepang? Looks like a great case can be made for him championship fixing. AFTER the tongue lashing of course.Awesome....could you please provide me with a link to Iannone's comments so I can check the date and time they were made.
Cheers.
Squiggle, I wrote a post on Iannone's comments a while back. And the ambiguity of it.
All AI said was that Marquez was 'playing' with them at PI. Which allows MotoVD to reinterpret it into complete agreement with Rossi's theory.
Just as the words of Webb have been reinterpreted into an attempt to sabotage Rossi's season.
OK, and the rule he broke?
No mind-reading gear needed, Iannone was right there racing with Rossi and Marc at PI. You can claim that he was only agreeing with Rossi because they're friends, but these guys know abnormal behavior on the track. It's not like they're too stupid to recognize when Marc is unnecessarily slowing down.
No mind-reading gear needed, Iannone was right there racing with Rossi and Marc at PI. You can claim that he was only agreeing with Rossi because they're friends, but these guys know abnormal behavior on the track. It's not like they're too stupid to recognize when Marc is unnecessarily slowing down.
But when did he go public with his concerns ............... I do know that it was after Rossi had spoken on the Thursday
No offence to Ianonne, but his comments would have carried far more weight were they made alone and unprompted and not after he had been 'somewhat rescued from vitriol' by Rossi.
Jums, Thanks for bringing up Iannone's exit at Sepang. That was his second DNF due to engine problems(, No)?
Another point of interest - the longevity or otherwise of the Ducati's engines - from Sepang that this Rossi-inspired melodrama has overshadowed...
Given that MotoGP doesn't have a rich history of riders attacking the integrity of the sport by engaging in race fixing, there is no "Race fixing" chapter in the rulebook. Marc escaped an official penalty because there is no rule. However, he did leave with 0 points, a bruised ego, and will be losing his championship title next weekend.
Bradley Smith (Tech 3 Yamaha): “I saw the incident, and I don’t agree with it. It’s not something that should be allowed in MotoGP. It’s not a normal incident—knocking another rider down—and I have to follow what the Race Direction decided to do. We are all here to race and do the best possible. What Marquez decided to do against Valentino is up to him. We are 24 riders on the grid and we are allowed to do exactly what we want, even if we are not fighting for the championship.”
Given that even Rossi probably shouldn't have gone public with his comments, you actually think it would have been Iannone's place to come forward BEFORE Rossi?
I believe Iannone's problem at Sepang was a busted radiator from a rock that was kicked up at the start.