This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Silverstone GP 2013: RACE (spoilers)

Jumkie
3602491378069709

Actually, HRC should make Pedro relinquish his bike and give it to somebody with some fire and desire, like Redding.


As you said in another thread my good friend, Rins, Salom or Vinales (- apparently walking out on your team and championship is a good career move in Spain). 


 


The situation with Reading and Espagaro is deplorable. The best Scott can ultimately hope for in 2015 is to remain at Gresini with a Bautista level of factory support or LCR. Thank .... Cal spared him the Ducati route though.
 
Lyria
3601991378048845

Pedrosa caught up to the front runners but couldn't muscle his way by, he wanted to but just couldn't do it I'd say. 


Apparently he's been warned by HRC about his wild riding and to give MM a wide berth. Some are suggesting that team orders may have already been introduced where you could clearly see that Dani had the speed to pass Marc but was holding back.
 
Jumkie
3602301378066710

A few things that have changed with this formula: Now riders can make up time on the track to make up for mistakes, ala VR at Qatar ala Pedro today. The 800 style of wheels in perfect line is no longer the prescribed and only way to race (something I think MurderMarshal is capitalizing on). The fuel mapping is as much part of the strategy as is tire preservation, evidenced by VR making up time but running out of gas ala Qatar, as happened today. 


We speculated that with the increase in grunt that this might be the case - although we also thought that we might see a return to the late apex and this hasn't happened...but I agree, riders can now claw back a mistake similar to the the 990 era - although perhaps not as easily. Jorge is still riding that M1 like a big 250, and his style has barely had to have been modified since the 800cc formula. It's been brilliant watching the contrast in styles all season that as you say the new formula has allowed - particularly at a track like Silverstone. Agree about the fuel mapping becoming part of the strategy, but as I said in another thread, in respect of Rossi - whether he ran out of gas or not - tyre management is still his major strength and perhaps one of his few remaining advantages over the the fast guys. 
 
Arrabbiata1
3607761378644017

I have been making a similar point for quite some time. Don't entirely agree - discounting the CRT's (because Colin, Alex and Randy would certainly be faring better on superior equipment), Dovi would be beating both Bradl and Bautista and as maligned as he is on here, who knows what Nicky would be capable of on a factory RCV or M1. I don't think he'd be in Bradley's reach as he is now. 

 

Where I do agree is that the top three would still be precisely that...the top three. Unfortunately they're all Spanish which has lead to allegations (rightly or wrongly) of preferential treatment throughout their careers. But, overlooking that, I agree, as it stands if you were to furnish the entire field with their choice of factory ride MM, JL and DP would continue to monopolise the podium. I'll say it again...whatever we think about Pedro being on that bike since 2006, who currently on the grid would be fairing any better? - second in the World Championship? I guess the frustrating thing is, that few riders would have had the opportunity of eight seasons on a full factory HRC ride without delivering a title. 


This is a great ........ job that sold to fans by journalists like Krop.

Every week they hold qualifying and occasionally someone other than the top four gets pole or lands in the front row. This is the elaborate dog and pony show that fools fans into thinking that MotoGP is a sport where anyone can win on any given Sunday. We are all being duped week after week after week. I don't necessarily disagree that the top four would finish in the top four most of the time. If there was some competent journalism maybe fans could See through the dog and pony ......... The last time a non-factory bike won a dry race was 2006. We all know the reason why Tony Elias bagged that win. Since that win there have been over 110 races. There is no possible way that the top four riders are so much better that they got it right 110 times and not once was anyone else able squeak out a surprise victory.

Thats 7 years of the same old .... week after week. The simple and indisputable fact is If you're not on a factory bike you're not gonna win
 
or if your name is nicky hayden, colin edwards or ben spies. actually any american.


 


superb post arrabi, feel the same way.


not sure i agree though that jorge hasn't changed at all, i feel i have seen him do the typical standing the bike up etc big bike riding more and more.


nobody should have expected any too big changes with the fuel limit still in place but i absolutely agree and am pleasently surprised that the effects it had on the various options of riding are much more visible than what i had originally anticipated TBH
 
JohnnyKnockdown
3607861378656246

This is a great ........ job that sold to fans by journalists like Krop.

Every week they hold qualifying and occasionally someone other than the top four gets pole or lands in the front row. This is the elaborate dog and pony show that fools fans into thinking that MotoGP is a sport where anyone can win on any given Sunday. We are all being duped week after week after week. I don't necessarily disagree that the top four would finish in the top four most of the time. If there was some competent journalism maybe fans could See through the dog and pony ......... The last time a non-factory bike won a dry race was 2006. We all know the reason why Tony Elias bagged that win. Since that win there have been over 110 races. There is no possible way that the top four riders are so much better that they got it right 110 times and not once was anyone else able squeak out a surprise victory.

Thats 7 years of the same old .... week after week. The simple and indisputable fact is If you're not on a factory bike you're not gonna win


I think what gets massively overlooked in this argument is the advent of the 800cc formula. The 990's were basically brutal superbikes on steroids. Between their inaugural year in 2002, and 2006 they saw substantial technical development but the quantum leap came with the 800cc class and comparison between the two is as fallacious as it is pointless. A 990 was prehistoric in comparison with an 800cc bike. The massively different characteristics of the 800cc machines and the philosophy behind them was underpinned by huge reliance upon electronics and the technical revolution which was already underway went suddenly from gradual evolution to the exponential. Accompanying that trend, was the cost of racing which similarly soared. Also, as Jum mentioned earlier, the huge torque of a 990 meant that to a degree it compensated for errors. Put bluntly, the 990's were easier to ride. I would also add that the 800's were infinitely more fearsome due to their higher corner speed...and it wasn't long before they were matching the top end speeds of their supposedly lethal predecessors. 


 


I think when making the argument that the last satellite machine to win a race was in 2006 its important to acknowledge that 1/ The advent of the 800's increased the disparities between the full factory teams and the satellite machinery; and 2/ Had the 990 formula lasted longer than four years we would have continued to see non factory bikes and riders both on and at the top step of the podium.


 


Let's go there again. Notionally - if we have a completely equitable grid of full factory motorcycles - right now, who would be taking places away from Marquez, Lorenzo and Pedrosa? The reordering would be mid pack and towards the back of the grid. The one thing I can guarantee is that it would spawn hundreds of threads alleging that Dorna were secretly supplying Marc Marquez with superior equipment when he continued to win.
 
Arrabbiata1
3607781378644626

Apparently he's been warned by HRC about his wild riding and to give MM a wide berth. Some are suggesting that team orders may have already been introduced where you could clearly see that Dani had the speed to pass Marc but was holding back.


 


Hold on, didn't we have this discussion earlier in the season when Marquez didn't pass Pedrosa and you insisted it woudn't be because he'd been told not to? Now Pedrosa has been told not to pass Marquez?


 


For once I'm speechless!!
 
Lyria
3609071378915000

Hold on, didn't we have this discussion earlier in the season when Marquez didn't pass Pedrosa and you insisted it woudn't be because he'd been told not to? Now Pedrosa has been told not to pass Marquez?


 


For once I'm speechless!!


 


I thought Brits had a special gene to detect sarcasm.  My respected and  fantastically admired friend Arrabi is convinced that HRC didn't talk to their rookie to execute passes prudently when overtaking his then title contending teammate (on the heels of him almost taking him out); that they didn't speak to him in some form is HIGHLY UNLIKELY (at best) given Ducati have felt the need to warn their veteran and world champ riders about aggressive riding (who are battling for 9th/10th).  And I'll add, given Marc's subsequent more patient and measured strikes is evidence for me that this conversation with the boy took place.  Again, the distinction between these two points: coaching the rookie about effective passing is NOT tantamount to "team orders", as this is NOT the same thing.  For the record, yes, agree, HRC do not traditionally institute "team orders.  The point of contention was not that Marc was told to follow Pedro (that would be team orders, and Arrabi would be correct is saying this is doubtful); but rather I assert that Marc was told (as I thought you did too) to be smart about overtaking, that is when passing Pedro to avoid ramming his ... like he did to Lorenzo.  
 
Jumkie
3609091378915823

I thought Brits had a special gene to detect sarcasm.  My respected and  fantastically admired friend Arrabi is convinced that HRC didn't talk to their rookie to execute passes prudently when overtaking his then title contending teammate (on the heels of him almost taking him out); that they didn't speak to him in some form is HIGHLY UNLIKELY (at best) given Ducati have felt the need to warn their veteran and world champ riders about aggressive riding (who are battling for 9th/10th).  And I'll add, given Marc's subsequent more patient and measured strikes is evidence for me that this conversation with the boy took place.  Again, the distinction between these two points: coaching the rookie about effective passing is NOT tantamount to "team orders", as this is NOT the same thing.  For the record, yes, agree, HRC do not traditionally institute "team orders.  The point of contention was not that Marc was told to follow Pedro (that would be team orders, and Arrabi would be correct is saying this is absurd); but rather I assert that Marc was told (as I thought you did too) to be smart about overtaking, that is when passing Pedro to avoid ramming his ... like he did to Lorenzo.  


 


 


I'm sorry, my sarcasm gene is obviously faulty right now ;) 


 


You're right, I never said team orders, just a quiet word was had, not the same thing at all.
 
Lyria
3609071378915000

Hold on, didn't we have this discussion earlier in the season when Marquez didn't pass Pedrosa and you insisted it woudn't be because he'd been told not to? Now Pedrosa has been told not to pass Marquez?


 


For once I'm speechless!!


 




 


 
Jumkie
3609091378915823

I thought Brits had a special gene to detect sarcasm.  



The above.


 


Still trying to find the 'straight over the head emoticon' for BM. Didn't expect to have to go looking for you Angel.


 


Anyway, glad someone noticed that at last - was just trying to make an equally ridiculous point in my own somewhat crude and sarcastic way. For much of the mid race...I think I noticed it in particular with ten laps remaining (whatever lap that was, can't be arsed to look and work it out) watch Pedrosa closing on Marquez...it was identical to Marc at Catalunya. He closed on the brakes and simply couldn't get by but because of this looked tentative an hesitant. Admittedly Silverstone is easier to pass than Catalunya but the scenario was practically identical...so I simply drew the same conclusion as the rest of you to illustrate how ludicrous it was. 


 


Marquez may indeed have been warned by HRC as a rookie to exercise caution around Pedrosa - of course that is feasible, but he certainly wasn't warned off as some suggested. Go back and look at the Catalan thread - it's all there. The dispute is not whether HRC may or may not have told Marc to be mindful of his teammate it's the fact that some were suggesting that you could see this in his supposed reluctance to pass Dani, to which I say total ......... I suggest the opposite...he was encouraged to give Dani some .... and I've seen comments from Suppo which all but confirm this. They loved the way that Stoner raised the bar when he came to Honda and like I say, far from reining him in, I think the plan was all along for Marquez to have a shot at the title even if that means fairing bashing with Pedrosa. Of course it's all fine until there's a repeat of Estoril 2006, which let us not forget happened because HRC don't tend to issue team orders in recent years. Or a Le Mans 2011 - which will still be fresh in Dani's mind but probably not so much HRC bosses. 


 


I thought the whole point was that according to 'Powerslide popular wisdom' - neither Dorna or HRC have at any stage properly reprimanded Marquez  for his 'reckless riding' - far less cautioned him about swapping paint with his team mate. Make yer friggin' minds up!!!
 
Lyria
3609191378922520

I'm sorry, my sarcasm gene is obviously faulty right now ;)


 


You're right, I never said team orders, just a quiet word was had, not the same thing at all.


Go back and read the original thread and some of the posts. Also I can assure you, 'quiet word' wasn't the suggestion...because indeed you're right, it's not the same thing at all.
 
Arrabb Jums and Lyria.


Thanks I had a great chuckle after a ludicrously busy few days.


The sarcasm was as subtle as a punch in the nose though ;)
 
[quote name="Arrabbiata1" post="360934" timestamp="1378935749"]



Anyway, glad someone noticed that at last - was just trying to make an equally ridiculous point in my own somewhat crude and sarcastic way. For much of the mid race...I think I noticed it in particular with ten laps remaining (whatever lap that was, can't be arsed to look and work it out) watch Pedrosa closing on Marquez...it was identical to Marc at Catalunya. He closed on the brakes and simply couldn't get by but because of this looked tentative an hesitant. Admittedly Silverstone is easier to pass than Catalunya but the scenario was practically identical...so I simply drew the same conclusion as the rest of you to illustrate how ludicrous it was.

Marquez may indeed have been warned by HRC as a rookie to exercise caution around Pedrosa - of course that is feasible, but he certainly wasn't warned off as some suggested. Go back and look at the Catalan thread - it's all there. The dispute is not whether HRC may or may not have told Marc to be mindful of his teammate it's the fact that some were suggesting that you could see this in his supposed reluctance to pass Dani, to which I say total ......... I suggest the opposite...he was encouraged to give Dani some .... and I've seen comments from Suppo which all but confirm this. They loved the way that Stoner raised the bar when he came to Honda and like I say, far from reining him in, I think the plan was all along for Marquez to have a shot at the title even if that means fairing bashing with Pedrosa. Of course it's all fine until there's a repeat of Estoril 2006, which let us not forget happened because HRC don't tend to issue team orders in recent years. Or a Le Mans 2011 - which will still be fresh in Dani's mind but probably not so much HRC bosses.

I thought the whole point was that according to 'Powerslide popular wisdom' - neither Dorna or HRC have at any stage properly reprimanded Marquez for his 'reckless riding' - far less cautioned him about swapping paint with his team mate. Make yer friggin' minds up!!![/quote]


First of all, what a delight to be reading your posts, your intermittent absence is always noticed dear friend. Buddy, I'm honestly trying to make sense of your two separate but related points: on one hand you say its feasible that HRC spoke to Marc to be mindful of overtaking his teammate (which is what I have been asserting from the beginning), on the other hand you chide the duality of the suggestion with the reasoning that how could one believe it possible to have cautioned him whilst the league never having reprimanded him properly? HRC as an entity had much more reason to caution him as they would have directly been negatively affected had he injured Pedro and injured himself in the process given a propensity of unfettered reckless riding, a highly likely scenario given Dani's physical fragility. And I'll add, not without good reason in hindsight, as Pedro has actually suffered from injury this year, albeit self-inflicted (I can only imagine the hindsight of one PS collective wisdom had injury come at the hands of Marquez).

As to the point about the League (Dorna) not properly reprimanding: We are talking about a point very early in the season, where coming off his Moto2 tenure he had repeatedly (as it was well documented) attempted murder suicide, and had a reputation for such! It wasn't just PS's popular wisdom (which I agree can be right down stupid sometimes) but his riding, during races and in practice was known by many and perceived by most to be "reckless". Then, in the first rounds of the season he rams Lorenzo and in another occasion comes so close to Pedro's rear wheel on overtaking attempts that easily should have been a red flag to the 'prudent' handlers in his HRC garage (the one absent in his Moto2 garage). It wouldn't have taken much imagination to conceive this racing tactic if not addressed could have ended in a crash (of course some would rather believed he was in total control and would argue he 'meant to be so close'---that is until they are skidding off the track, on to a stretcher, and into Clinica Mobile, then our collective 'hindsight wisdom' would have declared, 'what an .....' right?). Its at this point in space and time that the suggestion was made he had not been properly cautioned by his team nor properly reprimanded by the League. Exactly how you might gather otherwise given his last years in Moto2 and early races in MotoGP, when little to nothing had been done to thwart such racing (and practice) tactics prior to Catalunya would be an interesting and difficult case to make. In fact, many people believed the new "penalty points" system was in direct response to Marquez's particular and dangerous reputation (even according to his biggest fan Kropo). Enter Catalunya (with all of its circuit characteristics) to me after further review, it became my belief that the "feasible" indeed occurred; that somebody had finally spoken to young Marquez to be mindful of overtaking Pedrosa (because as I said at the time, Marc's MO would have been to simply ram Pedro out of his way, as had been his custom up until that point). You at the time disputed the notion he had been talked to, and further likened it to "team orders" (which was not my assertion at all (and neither according to Lyra); but rather that it was likely Marc had been told to exercise a bit more caution when overtaking his teammate). Frankly, I think it worked, as his overtaking since then has been tactically and technically superb and a thrill to watch.

Edit to add: (for ..... and giggles, as I always enjoy picking ur mind for insight): Bro, U wittingly used sarcasm to point out how "ludicrous" it is to draw a similar conclusion from two "practically identical" scenarios (with caveat they're not really identical because Silverstone offers more passing opportunity). In the Catalan thread u stressed the point that Catalunya is particularly difficult to overtake, which u pointed out as a major reason why Marc failed to pass Pedro (to contrast my suggestion that Marc was simply employing a measured tactic which to me was evidence that somebody had likely talked to him about riding feasible against his teammate, a point u dismissed). Ur argument was/is that it was absurd to suggest HRC would caution Marc, and at somepoint the argument became tantamount to "team orders" (honestly not sure how that happened). So lets distill these TWO seperate points once and for all: if somebody here is saying (or as u say "suggesting") HRC instituted "team orders", then by all means lets not use subtle sarcasm to point out how "ludicrous" and "ridiculous" thier conclusion is, pounce on those ignorant folks all u want, call them out by name so I can also laugh at them brotha! (Again, my point is that he was probably spoken to which resulted in a measured approach to his teammate, exhibited by Marc's 'tentative and hestitance' to pass Pedro at Catalunya. A point I'd be happy to continue to debate).

Anyway buddy, I dont think anybody was "suggesting" 'team orders' at Silverstone for this to point to reserect; but frankly the 'comparison' was rather unrealistic. For fake god sakes man, Pedro? Haha. I will tell u what I think IS "ludicrous": its the suggestion that Pedro would attempt an aggressive overtaking maneuver given the "identical" opportunity at Silverstone that was presented to Marc at Catalunya.
 
Arrabbiata1
3607801378645979

We speculated that with the increase in grunt that this might be the case - although we also thought that we might see a return to the late apex and this hasn't happened...but I agree, riders can now claw back a mistake similar to the the 990 era - although perhaps not as easily. Jorge is still riding that M1 like a big 250, and his style has barely had to have been modified since the 800cc formula. It's been brilliant watching the contrast in styles all season that as you say the new formula has allowed - particularly at a track like Silverstone. Agree about the fuel mapping becoming part of the strategy, but as I said in another thread, in respect of Rossi - whether he ran out of gas or not - tyre management is still his major strength and perhaps one of his few remaining advantages over the the fast guys. 


 


Has tyre management been an issue for MM, JL and DP? Even when DP ostensibly chewed his tyres up in the chase at Silverstone, he was still running faster laps toward the end than VR. Or put another way, perhaps tyres last longer when you're 10+ seconds down?


 


I don't disagree that Vale is good at running on worn tyres, but I can't think of where this has been an advantage for him this year??


 


 


You make an interesting point re: whether the 1000s are allowing contrasting styles to come to the fore.


 


It very much seems they have... but a thought: the 1000s are now in their third year, on the same fuel capacity as the 800s, with 200cc more... Given the rate of ECU development, would 2 more years of 800cc pegged at 21l capacity allowed engine characteristics such that we'd see a similar development in riding styles? (Note: This is a thought exercise, not a call for the return of 800s...)
 
Dr No
3609541378953416

Has tyre management been an issue for MM, JL and DP? Even when DP ostensibly chewed his tyres up in the chase at Silverstone, he was still running faster laps toward the end than VR. Or put another way, perhaps tyres last longer when you're 10+ seconds down?


 


Ouch! Haha, but I feel the same everytime people try to suggest that Rossi or Crutchlow's pace is "as good as the leaders" in the closing stages. Who cares, the race is well and truly over by that stage. You could probably cruise for the entire race and then use your tyres to put in the fastest lap right at the end - but I doubt the guys on the podium will care.
 
Arrabbiata1
3609341378935749





 


 



The above.


 


Still trying to find the 'straight over the head emoticon' for BM. Didn't expect to have to go looking for you Angel.


 


Anyway, glad someone noticed that at last - was just trying to make an equally ridiculous point in my own somewhat crude and sarcastic way. For much of the mid race...I think I noticed it in particular with ten laps remaining (whatever lap that was, can't be arsed to look and work it out) watch Pedrosa closing on Marquez...it was identical to Marc at Catalunya. He closed on the brakes and simply couldn't get by but because of this looked tentative an hesitant. Admittedly Silverstone is easier to pass than Catalunya but the scenario was practically identical...so I simply drew the same conclusion as the rest of you to illustrate how ludicrous it was. 


 


Marquez may indeed have been warned by HRC as a rookie to exercise caution around Pedrosa - of course that is feasible, but he certainly wasn't warned off as some suggested. Go back and look at the Catalan thread - it's all there. The dispute is not whether HRC may or may not have told Marc to be mindful of his teammate it's the fact that some were suggesting that you could see this in his supposed reluctance to pass Dani, to which I say total ......... I suggest the opposite...he was encouraged to give Dani some .... and I've seen comments from Suppo which all but confirm this. They loved the way that Stoner raised the bar when he came to Honda and like I say, far from reining him in, I think the plan was all along for Marquez to have a shot at the title even if that means fairing bashing with Pedrosa. Of course it's all fine until there's a repeat of Estoril 2006, which let us not forget happened because HRC don't tend to issue team orders in recent years. Or a Le Mans 2011 - which will still be fresh in Dani's mind but probably not so much HRC bosses. 


 


I thought the whole point was that according to 'Powerslide popular wisdom' - neither Dorna or HRC have at any stage properly reprimanded Marquez  for his 'reckless riding' - far less cautioned him about swapping paint with his team mate. Make yer friggin' minds up!!!


 


 
Arrabbiata1
3609351378935946

Go back and read the original thread and some of the posts. Also I can assure you, 'quiet word' wasn't the suggestion...because indeed you're right, it's not the same thing at all.


 


Okay, define the difference between warned and warned off, I must be having a thickie moment because I'm not seeing a huge difference there. I said something like he was warned off from making a bold move and taking out his team mate. If I'd meant team orders I'd have used those words and I never did, mostly because I despise them as a fan. I said then, and I still stick to it, that Marquez had been spoken to by the team and told to be careful, that's all.


 


 
lil red rocket pilot
3609391378939748

Arrabb Jums and Lyria.


Thanks I had a great chuckle after a ludicrously busy few days.


The sarcasm was as subtle as a punch in the nose though ;)


 


Yeah well I was knackered from an afternoon of digging in the garden and about to come off the computer when I saw that and I was WTF?!!!  I see it was sarcasm now or course :rolleyes:
 
Lyria
3609631378964705

Okay, define the difference between warned and warned off, I must be having a thickie moment because I'm not seeing a huge difference there. I said something like he was warned off from making a bold move and taking out his team mate. If I'd meant team orders I'd have used those words and I never did, mostly because I despise them as a fan. I said then, and I still stick to it, that Marquez had been spoken to by the team and told to be careful, that's all.


 


 


 


Yeah well I was knackered from an afternoon of digging in the garden and about to come off the computer when I saw that and I was WTF?!!!  I see it was sarcasm now or course :rolleyes:


Do you then still adhere to the view that apparently you could clearly see from his riding that he was not only tentative around Dani, but reluctant to make a pass? Because as I recall you were saying from years of watching F1 you can unequicocally tell when a racer is holding back. The assertion made was that Marc could have passed Dani but chose not to take the risk because HRC had instructed him to hold back - yeah hold back, because that's what members ere inveighing at the time - revisit the thread, it's all there. It's now conveniently changed since to HRC 'having a quiet word' regarding taking care around Dani. Like I say, yeah he may have been reminded of the consequences of taking out his team mate...it's possible, but I'm not convinced - and I refer again to some very telling insight from Livio Suppo regarding the HRC philosophy surrounding team mates. Out on track, are you really still trying to suggest that Marquez would take any heed of this and temper his riding accordingly to such an extent that armchair experts watching at home can beyond doubt conclude what's was governing the Marc Marquez modus operandi/decision making process? Being warned is, like I say feasible but unlikely because I don't believe that HRC want to stymie him in any way - and really what grounds did they have to do so this season? The pass he made on Pedro at Austin was clean, and although some of his late braking has produced a few heart in the mouth moments there was no unue cause for concern for HRC or perceived risk he posed to his team mates title challenge. Being 'warned off' on the other hand is the impression that I was left with regarding the prevailing PS school of thought following several posts in the Catalunya race thread. Whereby, the view seemed to be, Marc is expressly told to give Dani space and not attempt any passing maneuvers that might involve an element of risk to his team mate. In other words, not to race with him...because that is what it would be tantamount to.


 


First, I am arguing that HRC are quite happy to let Marquez out of his cage and on the contrary, that he has been and is, actively encouraged to take it to Pedrosa. Secondly, even if they did warn him to be careful around his team mate, I don't think come race day he'd give a rats arse. Thirdly, he didn't pass Pedrosa in Spain because quite simply, he couldn't, not because as you suggested he was holding back. Hasn't posed a problem since and he's leading the Championship and winning races in part because he was never told to hold back and never told to be careful around his team mate. Actually, forget whether he was or wasn't spoken to - it's a moot point, I personally don't believe he was but that is not the issue. My main contention is that irrespective of this, Marc Marquez does not hold back, you were mistaken at the time and I think that the subsequent races have fully vindicated my point.
 
Jumkie
3609421378940146

First of all, what a delight to be reading your posts, your intermittent absence is always noticed dear friend. Buddy, I'm honestly trying to make sense of your two separate but related points: on one hand you say its feasible that HRC spoke to Marc to be mindful of overtaking his teammate (which is what I have been asserting from the beginning), on the other hand you chide the duality of the suggestion with the reasoning that how could one believe it possible to have cautioned him whilst the league never having reprimanded him properly? HRC as an entity had much more reason to caution him as they would have directly been negatively affected had he injured Pedro and injured himself in the process given a propensity of unfettered reckless riding, a highly likely scenario given Dani's physical fragility. And I'll add, not without good reason in hindsight, as Pedro has actually suffered from injury this year, albeit self-inflicted (I can only imagine the hindsight of one PS collective wisdom had injury come at the hands of Marquez). As to the point about the League (Dorna) not properly reprimanding: We are talking about a point very early in the season, where coming off his Moto2 tenure he had repeatedly (as it was well documented) attempted murder suicide, and had a reputation for such! It wasn't just PS's popular wisdom (which I agree can be right down stupid sometimes) but his riding, during races and in practice was known by many and perceived by most to be "reckless". Then, in the first rounds of the season he rams Lorenzo and in another occasion comes so close to Pedro's rear wheel on overtaking attempts that easily should have been a red flag to the 'prudent' handlers in his HRC garage (the one absent in his Moto2 garage). It wouldn't have taken much imagination to conceive this racing tactic if not addressed could have ended in a crash (of course some would rather believed he was in total control and would argue he 'meant to be so close'---that is until they are skidding off the track, on to a stretcher, and into Clinica Mobile, then our collective 'hindsight wisdom' would have declared, 'what an .....' right?). Its at this point in space and time that the suggestion was made he had not been properly cautioned by his team nor properly reprimanded by the League. Exactly how you might gather otherwise given his last years in Moto2 and early races in MotoGP, when little to nothing had been done to thwart such racing (and practice) tactics prior to Catalunya would be an interesting and difficult case to make. In fact, many people believed the new "penalty points" system was in direct response to Marquez's particular and dangerous reputation (even according to his biggest fan Kropo). Enter Catalunya (with all of its circuit characteristics) to me after further review, it became my belief that the "feasible" indeed occurred; that somebody had finally spoken to young Marquez to be mindful of overtaking Pedrosa (because as I said at the time, Marc's MO would have been to simply ram Pedro out of his way, as had been his custom up until that point). You at the time disputed the notion he had been talked to, and further likened it to "team orders" (which was not my assertion at all (and neither according to Lyra); but rather that it was likely Marc had been told to exercise a bit more caution when overtaking his teammate). Frankly, I think it worked, as his overtaking since then has been tactically and technically superb and a thrill to watch. Edit to add: (for ..... and giggles, as I always enjoy picking ur mind for insight): Bro, U wittingly used sarcasm to point out how "ludicrous" it is to draw a similar conclusion from two "practically identical" scenarios (with caveat they're not really identical because Silverstone offers more passing opportunity). In the Catalan thread u stressed the point that Catalunya is particularly difficult to overtake, which u pointed out as a major reason why Marc failed to pass Pedro (to contrast my suggestion that Marc was simply employing a measured tactic which to me was evidence that somebody had likely talked to him about riding feasible against his teammate, a point u dismissed). Ur argument was/is that it was absurd to suggest HRC would caution Marc, and at somepoint the argument became tantamount to "team orders" (honestly not sure how that happened). So lets distill these TWO seperate points once and for all: if somebody here is saying (or as u say "suggesting") HRC instituted "team orders", then by all means lets not use subtle sarcasm to point out how "ludicrous" and "ridiculous" thier conclusion is, pounce on those ignorant folks all u want, call them out by name so I can also laugh at them brotha! (Again, my point is that he was probably spoken to which resulted in a measured approach to his teammate, exhibited by Marc's 'tentative and hestitance' to pass Pedro at Catalunya. A point I'd be happy to continue to debate). Anyway buddy, I dont think anybody was "suggesting" 'team orders' at Silverstone for this to point to reserect; but frankly the 'comparison' was rather unrealistic. For fake god sakes man, Pedro? Haha. I will tell u what I think IS "ludicrous": its the suggestion that Pedro would attempt an aggressive overtaking maneuver given the "identical" opportunity at Silverstone that was presented to Marc at Catalunya.


I'm at work and in Birmingham tonight - but I need to write the reply that this deserves. Deserving, because as ever you make good lucid points and you articulate your contentions so well using concrete examples. You may well be "a bloody good bloke" my fine friend, but you have to an extent however contorted my argument - and on this occasion, you are also wrong. If I agreed with you all the time, which frustratingly I do tend to, life would be dull. I can't solely argue with BM and B.JC.


 


My friend, I do indeed think that Marquez has been spoken to by both HRC and Dorna - and there have indeed been recriminations over his riding in Moto 2.Further, that the warning point system is indeed a legacy of this. I agree this was before he'd even turned a wheel in anger.  I was lampooning the suggestions made on here that he hadn't in view of the contention that HRC had supposedly warned him about getting too close to Dani as opposed to this being or reflecting my view. I mistakenly believed that you held the view that Marquez has never been officially adequately reprimanded in any way over his wayward riding - which actually one could convincingly argue that he hasn't... adequately - and yet you were strong in the conviction that he had been cautioned by HRC over racing too closely with Dani. I stand corrected on that.


 


The insinuation was however, or the way I took it from the sentiments posted, that prior to Catalunya HRC had spoken to Marquez that week or even weekend and cautioned him about close racing with his teammate and that one could clearly deduce this from his failure to pass Dani, whatsmore that he was exercising caution trepidation and holding back where ordinarily he would have barrelled straight through to hell with the risks or consequences. That HRC may or may not have had stern or quiet words with him regarding Dani is moot. I don't believe they did, because they had no real reason to given as we agree that had already taken place prior to the season start. What I vehemently disagree with however is the view that during the Barcelona GP you could clearly see Marquez holding back - or even exercising uncharacteristic caution, which is apparently why he didn't pass Dani as a consequence of recent words from HRC..


 


Regarding the Silverstone comparison, I was merely being facecious...BUT...Dani's attempts to pass Marc were very reminiscent of the other way around at Catalunya which is why I made the sarcastic post. Dani didn't get by, very simply because he couldn't - even given, as I acknowledged, that Silverstone is an easier circuit to execute a pass than Catalunya. That in itself says as much about Dani's riding relative to Marc's as it does about the progress that Marc has made this season.


 


I'll say it again. At Catalunya, Marc simply could not pass Dani and I don't agree that he was holding off. Watch the race again and you'll see some very close lunges and some extreme attempts to outbrake him. He wasn't exercising caution as a result of 'words' from HRC, he just couldn't get by in spite of the fact that he looked faster overall as a consequence of the innate difficulties of the circuit - and given this, that Dani played the defensive card very well indeed.
 
Arrabbiata1
3609771378973783

Do you then still adhere to the view that apparently you could clearly see from his riding that he was not only tentative around Dani, but reluctant to make a pass? Because as I recall you were saying from years of watching F1 you can unequicocally tell when a racer is holding back. The assertion made was that Marc could have passed Dani but chose not to take the risk because HRC had instructed him to hold back - yeah hold back, because that's what members ere inveighing at the time - revisit the thread, it's all there. It's now conveniently changed since to HRC 'having a quiet word' regarding taking care around Dani. Like I say, yeah he may have been reminded of the consequences of taking out his team mate...it's possible, but I'm not convinced - and I refer again to some very telling insight from Livio Suppo regarding the HRC philosophy surrounding team mates. Out on track, are you really still trying to suggest that Marquez would take any heed of this and temper his riding accordingly to such an extent that armchair experts watching at home can beyond doubt conclude what's was governing the Marc Marquez modus operandi/decision making process? Being warned is, like I say feasible but unlikely because I don't believe that HRC want to stymie him in any way - and really what grounds did they have to do so this season? The pass he made on Pedro at Austin was clean, and although some of his late braking has produced a few heart in the mouth moments there was no unue cause for concern for HRC or perceived risk he posed to his team mates title challenge. Being 'warned off' on the other hand is the impression that I was left with regarding the prevailing PS school of thought following several posts in the Catalunya race thread. Whereby, the view seemed to be, Marc is expressly told to give Dani space and not attempt any passing maneuvers that might involve an element of risk to his team mate. In other words, not to race with him...because that is what it would be tantamount to.


 


First, I am arguing that HRC are quite happy to let Marquez out of his cage and on the contrary, that he has been and is, actively encouraged to take it to Pedrosa. Secondly, even if they did warn him to be careful around his team mate, I don't think come race day he'd give a rats arse. Thirdly, he didn't pass Pedrosa in Spain because quite simply, he couldn't, not because as you suggested he was holding back. Hasn't posed a problem since and he's leading the Championship and winning races in part because he was never told to hold back and never told to be careful around his team mate. Actually, forget whether he was or wasn't spoken to - it's a moot point, I personally don't believe he was but that is not the issue. My main contention is that irrespective of this, Marc Marquez does not hold back, you were mistaken at the time and I think that the subsequent races have fully vindicated my point.


No team orders at Sachsenring 2012, or apparently at PI 2012 although it was perhaps too early to tell, both probably to the detriment of a riders' championship win by a Honda rider.


 


Without necessarily any reference to the recent Silverstone race, I think it is getting close to the point both in this year's championship and in terms of recent championship results (HRC one in the last 6 years) that the HRC riders will have been strongly encouraged not to take each other out, even if this has not applied from the get-go as you (very likely correctly) say. I think Nakamoto is just about up for seppuku if HRC don't win this year for any reason, let alone as a result of "friendly fire".   
 

Recent Discussions