Its the other way round. I'm pointing that a rule that allows rider to retain his position when he cuts the track due an unforced error (as at Silverstone '16) should also cover a rider retaining his position after possibly being forced off the track.Again, the issue was whether he was run off the track. Perhaps just, I think a case can be made for the ruling, but less clearly than at Assen 2015 with MM imo.
The rule also covers maintaining position by going off track as you keep ignoring.
There's no discontinuity in how the rule was applied yesterday.
Last edited: